On 01.12.2023 23:01, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
In both cases, there are NO "hard" security features activated, hence
on both flash chips we should be able to clear those non-volatile
sector lock bits (called PPBs or persistent protection bits) and
unlock all sectors. The programming procedure
Hi Mychaela,
On 01.12.2023 23:01, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
Of course the MS Classmark does not contain any bits related to the
codec support. I meant to say the Bearer Capability, but wrote this
instead. In any case, for the sake of completeness, I will compare both
the Bearer Capability and
Hi Vadim,
> Today I took the phone apart and made a few photos of the PCB. Here is
> the best one of them, uploaded to Osmocom's Redmine:
>
> https://osmocom.org/attachments/7155
> https://osmocom.org/attachments/download/7155/SE-J120i-PCB.jpg
Thank you for this photo, it is very clear!
> *
Hi Mychaela and community,
On 30.11.2023 04:58, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
However, I now have to revise that hypothesis - my current working
hypothesis is that the swear block is, after all, fully defunct code,
totally dead. My rationale: the portion of the firmware we are looking
at here is
Hi Vadim,
> Of course the MS Classmark does not contain any bits related to the
> codec support. I meant to say the Bearer Capability, but wrote this
> instead. In any case, for the sake of completeness, I will compare both
> the Bearer Capability and the Classmark between those firmware
Hi Mychaela,
On 01.12.2023 15:47, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
* The IMEI reported by the phone starts with the '35617701' prefix we
saw, but the label behind the battery has a completely different IMEI
with a different prefix '35871701'.
A refurbished phone with mismatched plastic case and
Hi Vadim and community,
> I acquired another SE K200i and picked it up from the local post
> department today. It's the third K200i in my collection, and this new
> phone is a bit different from the two that I already have.
> [...]
> * SAMSUNG K5L29xx_A flash (according to fc-loadtool), not
