Re: New TOP SECRET OM device??

2007-10-06 Thread Rodolphe Ortalo
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 11:35 -0700, Michael Shiloh a écrit : Ok, that does it. No more pictures for my presentations! From now on my presentation tool will be vi. Hmmm, I wonder if using emacs would not be a better idea for putting an end to all these speculations? [...] I know that

Re: New TOP SECRET OM device??

2007-10-06 Thread Jeremy G
On 10/5/07, Jimmy McMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Shiloh wrote: Ok, that does it. No more pictures for my presentations! From now on my presentation tool will be vi. vi FTW!!! Complete with ASCII pictures, I hope. ___ OpenMoko

Re: New TOP SECRET OM device??

2007-10-06 Thread Ryan Prior
On 10/6/07, Rodolphe Ortalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 11:35 -0700, Michael Shiloh a écrit : Ok, that does it. No more pictures for my presentations! From now on my presentation tool will be vi. Hmmm, I wonder if using emacs would not be a better idea for

No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread thomas.cooksey
I've been following OpenMoko for nearly a year now and the thought has only just struck me - There's no camera! Even the GTA02 seems to be missing a camera. Surely if this is intended to be aimed at consumers a camera is a must? If you look on Nokia's website they have 35 phones listed. Filter

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Giles Jones
On 6 Oct 2007, at 18:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been following OpenMoko for nearly a year now and the thought has only just struck me - There's no camera! Even the GTA02 seems to be missing a camera. Surely if this is intended to be aimed at consumers a camera

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
Hi, Personally I'm glad to avoid having a camera, and I suppose (know) others think the same. Of course some want it, but as mentioned others don't. If I'm going to take pictures, I use a camera :-) Actually I think a knife would be more usable than a camera :-p Regards, Mikkel Giles Jones

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Kamisamanou Burgess
I would have to disagree. I don't care about having a camera on my phone. I know a few execs. of certain companies who have smartphones that don't even have cameras. You need to remember to distinguish between smartphone consumers and mainstream consumers. Most smartphone consumers, like myself,

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Jay Vaughan
There are great uses for a camera in a cellphone/PDA, such as: user interface! Digital vision! I can think of tons of apps to write that would use the camera to great effect.. it really is a shame its not going to be included in the GTA02/03 .. but okay. There are good reasons for

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread ian douglas
Frankly, I'm mixed on the subject. For years, I never had a camera phone. I avoided it, as I thought it was a waste. I'd look for phones that specifically didn't have a camera and it took a lot of legwork to find one that was suitable for what I needed but didn't include a camera. Then I got

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Martin Thierer
A survey on The Register (UK site) had camera at the lowest required feature with about 25% of people saying they need one and 25% saying the couldn't care less. Do you have a link? I can't seem to find it. Also, The Register's readers are hardly representative of the mobile phone market!

RE: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Richard Reichenbacher
I use to think I couldn't live without a camera on my phone but I decided to pick up a neo for the open source part. I've been using it with qtopia as an every day phone for the past week or so and I couldn't care less about having a camera anymore. I just don't care about it. -Original

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Kamisamanou Burgess
On 10/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the Neo is in no way a phone for the average. This marked is well served with the usual suspects. Ok, I was under the impression the Neo would be aimed at end users. Cheers, Tom PS: Sorry if this is going over ground already covered

Re: Security in OpenMoko

2007-10-06 Thread Cailan Halliday
Hey everybody, I just found this device: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4756295876.html I don't know anything about it really, but it's security related and might provide some inspiration? Cheers, Cailan From: Mikkel Meyer Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: community@lists.openmoko.org Date: Wed,

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Clayton Jones
I'm also conflicted about the camera. I don't think lack of a camera will doom the Neo. One thing to keep in mind - nowadays many companies are restricting the use of cell phones with cameras on company premises due to security and IP concerns. I know of many coworkers who've abandoned phones

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Giles Jones
On 6 Oct 2007, at 19:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The neo will not penetrate the consumer market without a camera. Not a chance. So, intentional or otherwise, the neo is going to be a geek's toy and nothing more. What a shame. It won't anyway, it's always going to be a power users toy.

RE: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread thomas.cooksey
A survey on The Register (UK site) had camera at the lowest required feature with about 25% of people saying they need one and 25% saying the couldn't care less. Do you have a link? I can't seem to find it. Also, The Register's readers are hardly representative of the mobile phone market!

RE: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread thomas.cooksey
You appear to only be focusing on one group that share a common interest. Keep in my that the OpenMoko/Neo 1973 is not necessarily designed for teenagers or kids who's sole focus is the text messaging and the camera. I thought it was aimed at non-techy people, I guess I was wrong. My point is

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Dylan McCall
Think of it in terms of modularity. You do not have to carry and think about a camera which will quickly become obsolete (or is already obsolete) compared to superior cameras that are available. Phone cameras are almost uniformly terrible, because they are tacked on as extra features with really

Re: Small menu bar

2007-10-06 Thread Kamisamanou Burgess
On 10/5/07, Emre Turkay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi people, The menu bar is too small, when using it with finger I have to click it with my fingernail (and I don't have a biig finger). Well, it works but it is hard. There's got to be a solution for it. What about keeping those 3 bottom

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Giles Jones
On 6 Oct 2007, at 20:21, Dylan McCall wrote: Think of it in terms of modularity. You do not have to carry and think about a camera which will quickly become obsolete (or is already obsolete) compared to superior cameras that are available. Phone cameras are almost uniformly terrible,

RE: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread thomas.cooksey
So there's no way a tiny sensor in a phone is ever going to be useful for much more than drunken shots in a pub/bar. I agree, and I'm sure that's what most phone cameras are used for. But people want to be able to take awful quality photos of their mates family doing stupid things, spur of

Re: Small menu bar

2007-10-06 Thread Emre Turkay
On 10/6/07, Kamisamanou Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/5/07, Emre Turkay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi people, The menu bar is too small, when using it with finger I have to click it with my fingernail (and I don't have a biig finger). Well, it works but it is hard. There's got to

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Giles Jones
On 6 Oct 2007, at 20:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So there's no way a tiny sensor in a phone is ever going to be useful for much more than drunken shots in a pub/ bar. I agree, and I'm sure that's what most phone cameras are used for. But people want to be able to take awful quality

RE: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread thomas.cooksey
So there's no way a tiny sensor in a phone is ever going to be useful for much more than drunken shots in a pub/ bar. I agree, and I'm sure that's what most phone cameras are used for. But people want to be able to take awful quality photos of their mates family doing stupid things,

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Ben Burdette
So ultimately i think not having a camera might diminish the market, but won't doom the phone. --clayton I have to agree. I personally would like a camera, and if I knew there would be a neo coming out with one in the near future I might even wait for it. But I don't think this will

Re: Security in OpenMoko

2007-10-06 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello, On 10/6/07, Cailan Halliday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey everybody, I just found this device: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4756295876.html I don't know anything about it really, but it's security related and This seems to be a HSM[1] device, it provides a hardware crypto

Getting the USB Host to work

2007-10-06 Thread thomas.cooksey
Hi All, I'm also trying to get the USB Host working on the neo. I've got a kernel running (2.6.22.5-r3) with the USB host patch. I'm logging in over bluetooth (as suggested in the wiki page) and have done an ifdown on usb0 (also recommended on the wiki page). When I echo host to usb_mode, I

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Michael Welter
My RAZR was confiscated by the security people when I entered a federal building in Denver. I felt naked without my phone... ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Giles Jones
On 6 Oct 2007, at 21:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow, you mean you've never seen anyone using the camera on their phone before? The little blighters are everywhere I seem to go. Usually at concerts, idiots watching the whole concert through a 2.5 inch screen instead of watching the

Re: No Camera???

2007-10-06 Thread Doug Sutherland
I do tech support for phones and I assure that there are many people who don't care about cameras. I knpw because they say exactly that I don't need a camera. However, based on the number of mms messaging, and problems with this I see, they certainly are popular with a lot of people. Lack of