>There is not a graphical interface so to start you must open the
>terminal go to "mokotrack" directory and type "./track"
>If everything works fine just launched the application will be
>assigned an ID and a password that is used to control the moko from
>web. To see the location you have to conne
On 09/20/2010 07:59 PM, Alfa21 wrote:
> I now compiled atd w/o this
>> define to see if it will work correctly. If it will - then this will be
>> fixed in the next release.
>>
> please take a look at:
> http://bugs.qtmoko.org/view.php?id=144
> also
>
>
Thats me (Samm :))
Once again - to
I Developed a real time tracker for the moko! If anyone wants to test can
download the tar at this link:
http://www.monkeyslair.net/openmoko/mokotrack.tar mokotrack tar
For run you must:
- Copy the file to moko
- Untar mokotrack.tar
- Edit the file conf and set the right APN, username and pas
2010-09...@19:14 Alex Samorukov
> I now compiled atd w/o this
> define to see if it will work correctly. If it will - then this will be
> fixed in the next release.
please take a look at:
http://bugs.qtmoko.org/view.php?id=144
also
kind regards
--
ALFA21 IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRA
Jeffrey Ratcliffe writes:
> 2010/9/20 Łukasz Pankowski :
>>> Are you saying that if I want to schedule new alarms, at say, 6.00,
>>> 6.05, and 6.10, then I should create 6.00, quit and restart ffalarms,
>>> create 6.05, etc..?
>>
>> No, only if you set two alarms at 6.00 they both start at 6.00 a
On 09/14/2010 11:08 AM, Christ van Willegen wrote:
> I, too, have experienced QtMoko. The one thing that annoys me, is that
> sometimes (well, more often than sometimes...) my FR turns on at
> night, and stays on until it wakes me from sleep indicating it's
> hungry... My wife doesn't approve :-(
>
Le 20/09/2010 16:26, Maksim 'max_posedon' Melnikau a écrit :
> Adding GSM to MID-device definitely will make this device extra-cool.
>
> Does somebody have idea how GSM could be added there?
> Voice is most important feature for me. 3G and so on, could be
> connected to touchbook part. May be its
Le 20/09/2010 16:16, Martix a écrit :
> Probably you meant company named Always Innovating[1] which is selling
> a netbooks/tablets/MIDs* based on OMAP 3530 [Cortex-A8 (ARM11)].
>
> [1] http://www.alwaysinnovating.com
> * Touch Book, Touch Book II, Smart Book, Mini Book
>
> GSM/3G support in Mini
On 09/18/2010 06:40 PM, Marcel Meyer wrote:
> * "on demand" does not seem to work. When I use NeronGPS and a map is missing,
> it seems as GPRS _tries_ to get online but that's all ;-)
>
I never tested "on demand" mode. Now i see that there is a bug in
original qtopia. When pppd is started in
Adding GSM to MID-device definitely will make this device extra-cool.
Does somebody have idea how GSM could be added there?
Voice is most important feature for me. 3G and so on, could be
connected to touchbook part. May be its possible attach some gsm
board? (FR's or others).
Maksim
Probably you meant company named Always Innovating[1] which is selling
a netbooks/tablets/MIDs* based on OMAP 3530 [Cortex-A8 (ARM11)].
[1] http://www.alwaysinnovating.com
* Touch Book, Touch Book II, Smart Book, Mini Book
GSM/3G support in Mini Book would be nice.
Regards,
Martix
PS: I am Tou
2010/9/20 Łukasz Pankowski :
>> Are you saying that if I want to schedule new alarms, at say, 6.00,
>> 6.05, and 6.10, then I should create 6.00, quit and restart ffalarms,
>> create 6.05, etc..?
>
> No, only if you set two alarms at 6.00 they both start at 6.00 and my
> schedule the next alarms tw
Jeffrey Ratcliffe writes:
> Hi Łukasz,
>
> 2010/9/20 Łukasz Pankowski :
>> I, as the author of ffalarms see it too :), but as no one complains I
>> can live with it. The problem is that at the moment if you set multiple
>
> Well, it *is* rather annoying.
>
>> alarms at the same time they all sch
Hi Łukasz,
2010/9/20 Łukasz Pankowski :
> I, as the author of ffalarms see it too :), but as no one complains I
> can live with it. The problem is that at the moment if you set multiple
Well, it *is* rather annoying.
> alarms at the same time they all schedule new alarms and due to race
> condi
Jeffrey Ratcliffe writes:
> ffalarms often rings with multiple simultaneous processes. Looking
> around to see what was going on, I expected to find some sort of
> at-command to queue the alarms, but the only at* executable is atd.
>
> So:
>
> a. anybody else seeing this behaviour from ffalarms?
Dnia 2010-09-20, pon o godzinie 11:32 +0100, Tilman Baumann pisze:
> Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > Dnia 2010-09-16, czw o godzinie 17:23 +0100, Al Johnson pisze:
> >> kdbus is proof-of-concept at the moment, the idea being to reduce the
> >> number
> >> of context switches needed for each dbus message.
ffalarms often rings with multiple simultaneous processes. Looking
around to see what was going on, I expected to find some sort of
at-command to queue the alarms, but the only at* executable is atd.
So:
a. anybody else seeing this behaviour from ffalarms?
b. how do I view the atd queue on SHR-T
Patryk Benderz wrote:
> Dnia 2010-09-16, czw o godzinie 17:23 +0100, Al Johnson pisze:
>> kdbus is proof-of-concept at the moment, the idea being to reduce the
>> number
>> of context switches needed for each dbus message. One synthetic
>> benchmark
>> shows a 3x speed increase on the n900 but spee
Hi,
As I was surfing, I found that the company Always Innovative(1) is
selling a new mini PC (3.5"). It's ARM8 based, touch interface, but
without any GSM connectivity.
A.I. is producing open hardware, they already have production processes,
a well knowledge in Arm and also other good point (foun
19 matches
Mail list logo
