Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread David Lanzendörfer
Seems as we lost our devroom after all. Sadly our project is still to small to get a room or so. Dunno. Mickey? Nikolaus? Do you wanna hold your presentation after all? You might get a presentation in one of the biggest rooms. Perhaps you can motivate more devs to help us getting OpenMoko rule the

Re: [QtMoko] Translation

2010-10-31 Thread Radek Polak
Ole Carlsen wrote: When there is a new official and non-official release could it then be possible to have a compressed file containing the translatable files on http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtmoko/files/ too? Sorry, i dont understand. What are you trying to achieve? Qtmoko is translated

Re: qtmoko v28

2010-10-31 Thread Radek Polak
ghislain wrote: I'm trying to adjust my installation images to start using ubifs, but I encounter the following problem: When I use your rootfs (qtmoko-debian-v28.ubi), everyting is fine, but when I use my custom rootfs-image I get a kernel panic. I think I do something wrong creating the

Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 10:48 +0100 schrieb David Lanzendörfer: Seems as we lost our devroom after all. Not surprising. That we got it last year was an exception thanks to Xorg not being able to fill in their slot. Unfortunately FOSDEM organizers fail to realize the importance of mobile

Re: [QtMoko] Translation

2010-10-31 Thread Ole Carlsen
Den 31-10-2010 11:23, Radek Polak skrev: Ole Carlsen wrote: When there is a new official and non-official release could it then be possible to have a compressed file containing the translatable files on http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtmoko/files/ too? Sorry, i dont understand. What are

Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
Am 31.10.2010 um 11:49 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 10:48 +0100 schrieb David Lanzendörfer: Seems as we lost our devroom after all. Bad news :( Not surprising. That we got it last year was an exception thanks to Xorg not being able to fill in their slot.

Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread David Lanzendörfer
What do you think? A bit guerilla... But seems to be the only way. So lets do a presentation visitation guidline for OM-interested people. best regards leviathan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Openmoko

Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread W. B. Kranendonk
--- On Sun, 10/31/10, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 10:48 +0100 schrieb David Lanzendörfer: Seems as we lost our devroom after all. Not surprising. That we got it last year was an exception thanks to Xorg not being able to fill in their slot.

Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Em 31-10-2010 11:23, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller escreveu: Not me. A lightning talk about the state of FSO on foreign hardware makes no sense to me and the program of the embedded room seems to be fixed to buildsystems, C libraries, and kernel tweakings for years now. Yes, that is also my

Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread Serdar Dere
Hi there, I got this eMail. I will try to get more information to get a few hours of time for us. Greetings Serdar Dear Serdar Dere, Unfortunately your devroom request for FOSDEM 2011 was declined. You might have discovered this indirectly already, we are very sorry for that. Something went

Re: [QtMoko] Translation

2010-10-31 Thread Radek Polak
You wrote: Den 31-10-2010 11:23, Radek Polak skrev: I received some files from you earlier that I'm using to translate into Danish but they were as far as I remember taken from the v26 and in the mean time there has been v27 and now the experimental has reached v28. I just thought there