All,
If you're reading the OpenMoko lists through gmane, please be aware:
The original gmane newsgroup mappings were mis-categorized through the
gmane.comp.hardware hierarchy. Since OpenMoko is not a type of
hardware, the lists have been moved to different newsgroups. The newly
created lists
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On 1/31/07 12:32 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So can you say us already a little more about the GSM chip?
Sure. We're using a Ti Calypso chipset. Unfortunately this stuff is all
under _super_ NDA :-(
Isn't the AT-capable port going to be available to
Therefore it'd require a lot of standardisation to create such a thing
where these all would be just another device of type X. If this was
possible then we *could* have a dbus address that has a program that
could advertise these features. Like this:
/xx/yy/zz NETWORKING_FEATURE
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Could please someone of list admins add the new -devel list to gmane.org?
I submitted the form yesterday, but it hasn't shown up in the nntp feed yet.
D.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
www.keepvid.com does what this does :-)
Or you can use this user script:
http://1024k.de/bookmarklets/video-bookmarklets.html
with Greasemonkey/Firefox and not have to go through third-party sites :)
D.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
What makes OpenMoko disruptive where the iPhone may not be is not WiFi
or VoIP per se.
The key ingredient is the control of one's personal public access
handle. Where voice is concerned that's your phone number. Even in
locales where number portability is available, the list of players among
Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
One last thing, it's something that is usually not implemented, as it
allows to lower phone costs; as the phone is being sold directly to
the users, it should relativly easy (politically) to implement.
My (somewhat aging) SE P910a with vanilla (i.e. non-crippled)
7 matches
Mail list logo
