Re: [PATCH] frameworkd battery status reporting

I previously wrote about some problems that I observed when switching from odeviced to fsodeviced, and I think I can now explain those better: On 28 February 2010 00:44, Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com wrote: Well, the Debian version of fsodeviced seems not to work straightforwardly yet.

Re: [PATCH] frameworkd battery status reporting

Hi Neil, can you point me to an example why this patch is necessary? On a related note, I think this code path is not in use since we moved to fsodeviced. -- :M: ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

Re: [PATCH] frameworkd battery status reporting

On 27 February 2010 12:29, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de wrote: Hi Neil, Hi Mickey, Thanks for taking a look at this... can you point me to an example why this patch is necessary? Isn't that covered by the quoted section of my previous email? In summary, after installing

Re: [PATCH] frameworkd battery status reporting

On 27 February 2010 19:04, Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com wrote: So I'll try switching to fsodeviced too; if that solves the problem, I agree that it's probably not worth changing the old Python code. Well, the Debian version of fsodeviced seems not to work straightforwardly yet. It

[PATCH] frameworkd battery status reporting

On 5 February 2010 22:44, Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com wrote: On 14 January 2010 22:41, Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com wrote: I've just installed Timo's kernel from