Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-29 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Alishams Hassam writes: > and disable the wifi. If the battery is still shit, leave wifi off after > a restart and see if battery life improves. How about giving exact numbers by measuring the consumption using om battery consumption or via /sys directly? (I think you need current_now file).

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Alishams Hassam
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:11 +0200, Gand' wrote: > really ? > because "always" doesn't seem to work, as my battery life doesn't > exceed a day with QTmoko, whereas it lasts more or less 3 days with > SHR ... > if it's not the #1024, what else ? > -- > Gand' Have you been using wifi? I know for su

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Gand'
really ? because "always" doesn't seem to work, as my battery life doesn't exceed a day with QTmoko, whereas it lasts more or less 3 days with SHR ... if it's not the #1024, what else ? -- Gand' On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Radek Polak wrote: > On Wednesday 28 April 2010 10:31:30 Gand' w

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Radek Polak
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 10:31:30 Gand' wrote: > The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko > /etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf* > is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR) It's the same if you have "always" or "yes". The code checks for "never" and

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Petr Vanek
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:31:30 +0200 "Gand'" (G) wrote: >The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko >/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf* >is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR) i have already corrected the 1024 page [1] on openmoko wiki if the confusio

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Gand'
The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko /etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf* is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR) -- Gand' On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Alfa21 wrote: > > another cause maybe: > > [quoting from wiki about debian] > echo 5

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-17 Thread Alfa21
another cause maybe: [quoting from wiki about debian] echo 500 > /sys/module/glamo_mci/parameters/sd_max_clk echo 3 > /sys/module/glamo_mci/parameters/sd_drive If that resolves the problem and installation completes, you are that much wiser. However, SD card performance is reduced even from

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-14 Thread Yann SLADEK
Hi Niels, Already did it (1024 bug fix and parameter modified) Regards, Yann - Mail Original - De: "Niels Heyvaert" À: community@lists.openmoko.org Envoyé: Mercredi 14 Avril 2010 10:11:00 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: RE: [QtMoko

RE: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-14 Thread Niels Heyvaert
Aslo see: http://qtmoko.org/wiki/FAQ#How_about_power_save_of_Calypso.2C_the_GSM_modem_-_bug_.231024 Niels. > Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:19:26 +0200 > From: yann.sla...@free.fr > To: community@lists.openmoko.org > Subject: Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024 > > As said before, by m

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Yann SLADEK
As said before, by modifying parameter 'Active' from' never' to 'always' and then reboot the phone Yann > Yann SLADEK writes: > >> With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying >> /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf >> > I do not use qtmoko but how did you modify Modem.c

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Yann SLADEK
Hi, I can't tell, count I use my FR for 30min a day for calls, maybe 30min-1h a day for missed calls and voicemail checking + shr playing :)) Same for QtMoko Yann (just a question: 70h suspension included? if yes how many hours of suspension?) d On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Yann SLADEK

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Margo
On 13 April 2010 22:18, Yann SLADEK wrote: > Hi list, > > for the past few weeks, I tried both QtMoko and SHR with my FR (#1024 > fixed by myself) > > With SHR, modifying /etc/frameworkd.conf did the trick and I can use my > FR for approx. 65-70h in a normal way (few calls, text, wifi just for > f

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Yann SLADEK writes: > With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying > /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf I do not use qtmoko but how did you modify Modem.conf? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://li

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Risto H. Kurppa
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Yann SLADEK wrote: > Hi list, > > for the past few weeks, I tried both QtMoko and SHR with my FR (#1024 > fixed by myself) > > With SHR, modifying /etc/frameworkd.conf did the trick and I can use my > FR for approx. 65-70h in a normal way (few calls, text, wifi ju

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Davide Scaini
(just a question: 70h suspension included? if yes how many hours of suspension?) d On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Yann SLADEK wrote: > Hi list, > > for the past few weeks, I tried both QtMoko and SHR with my FR (#1024 > fixed by myself) > > With SHR, modifying /etc/frameworkd.conf did the tric

[QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Yann SLADEK
Hi list, for the past few weeks, I tried both QtMoko and SHR with my FR (#1024 fixed by myself) With SHR, modifying /etc/frameworkd.conf did the trick and I can use my FR for approx. 65-70h in a normal way (few calls, text, wifi just for fun,etc..) With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after mod