-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am not against grey-listing but one should think carefully when
deploying it. I have threaded some of my comments below, I have also
deleted some of the previous message.
Harish Pillay wrote:
snip
Actually, intuitively, it seems to be putting a
Le 13874ième jour après Epoch,
GWMobile écrivait:
Email should be instanteous and if the specs haven't been updated to
call for that then the specs are outdated.
??? Why eMail *should* be instantaneous?
I don't stay on groups with email delays because it is impossible to
have a
[we are getting way off topic here]
On Dec 27, 2007 9:02 PM, GWMobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly disagree with you here.
Email should be instanteous and if the specs haven't been updated to
call for that then the specs are outdated.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html section
After reading about the greylist which apparently bounces everyones
email for a while, I would suggest no unless you are going to whitelist
all current subscribers and make it only greylist new emailers.
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:41 am, Michael Shiloh wrote:
Thanks Harish,
I'll forward your
Harish Pillay wrote:
May I make a suggestion to whoever is running this mailing list to add
the greylist technique to it as well? I have had milter-greylist
running on
my main email servers for over 12 months now, and the amount of spam
reaching my users/mailing lists has gone down to almost
After reading about the greylist which apparently bounces everyones
email for a while, I would suggest no unless you are going to whitelist
all current subscribers and make it only greylist new emailers.
Yes, that is true. What I have done on the servers I run - which serves
a userbase of
May I make a suggestion to whoever is running this mailing list to add
the greylist technique to it as well? I have had milter-greylist
running on
my main email servers for over 12 months now, and the amount of spam
reaching my users/mailing lists has gone down to almost zero.
I know
As most of you will surely guess, that email about magazine
subscriptions was spam.
We take your privacy very seriously and will take the necessary steps to
prevent this poster from using our list again.
Again, our apologies.
Michael Shiloh
___
thanks Michael
i got excited when i saw the subject only one more weeks thought
maybe something special was happening, but no. i was a little dubious
about the pluralisation of 'week' though.
happy Christmas!
On 25/12/2007, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As most of you will surely
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:09:52 +0100, Michael Shiloh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As most of you will surely guess, that email about magazine
subscriptions was spam.
We take your privacy very seriously and will take the necessary steps to
prevent this poster from using our list again.
Well,
May I make a suggestion to whoever is running this mailing list to add
the greylist technique to it as well? I have had milter-greylist running on
my main email servers for over 12 months now, and the amount of spam
reaching my users/mailing lists has gone down to almost zero.
Thanks.
Thanks Harish,
I'll forward your suggestion to our IT person.
Regards,
Michael
Harish Pillay wrote:
May I make a suggestion to whoever is running this mailing list to add
the greylist technique to it as well? I have had milter-greylist running on
my main email servers for over 12 months now,
12 matches
Mail list logo
