Em 17-03-2010 20:54, Niels Heyvaert escreveu:
And it's all fine and dandy if it wasn't so damn easy to casually change
the mic volume into some unusable mode. One setting works a lot better
(at least for me) and I only need to check it after upgrades!
Rui
Hi Rui,
Can you put your sound
And it's all fine and dandy if it wasn't so damn easy to casually change
the mic volume into some unusable mode. One setting works a lot better
(at least for me) and I only need to check it after upgrades!
Rui
Hi Rui,
Can you put your sound settings on the Wiki too? Just so that others
Em 16-03-2010 06:23, Timo Jyrinki escreveu:
2010/3/16 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
' You may call my tests misinformation, but I'll calmly go on with usable
sound settings with which I can be heard even from a noisy restaurant by
*NOT*USING* the Correct setting.
I am not claiming
And it's all fine and dandy if it wasn't so damn easy to casually change
the mic volume into some unusable mode. One setting works a lot better
(at least for me) and I only need to check it after upgrades!
Rui
Hi Rui,
Can you put your sound settings on the Wiki too? Just so that others
2010/3/16 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
' You may call my tests misinformation, but I'll calmly go on with usable
sound settings with which I can be heard even from a noisy restaurant by
*NOT*USING* the Correct setting.
I am not claiming the wrong settings would not help. The main
On 16 March 2010 06:23, Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/3/16 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
' You may call my tests misinformation, but I'll calmly go on with usable
sound settings with which I can be heard even from a noisy restaurant by
*NOT*USING* the Correct
On 16 March 2010 10:21, Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com wrote:
So, please could we have a bit more respect for people's empirical findings?
I should add that I'm aware that you, Timo, are a long time
contributor here, and personally I greatly appreciate your
contributions, especially with
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Neil Jerram wrote:
On 16 March 2010 06:23, Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/3/16 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
' You may call my tests misinformation, but I'll calmly go on with
usable
sound settings with which I can be heard even from a
2010/3/16 Neil Jerram neiljer...@googlemail.com:
I have to support Rui here. I find this over-theoretical argument
really annoying.
Sorry about that, and sorry about the term misinformation I used in
the first post.
Do you understand 100% the operation of the Wolfson codec?
No. But I do
To give some more non-theoretical vibe to this thread, I started a new
empirical mic data table at
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_Freerunner_audio_subsystem#Empirical_Data_for_Mic_Settings
- it's probable it will not be that helpful in searching any one
true defaults, but it might be
Well, former Openmoko CEO of marketing always said there is one state
file to rule them all - does that hold no longer?
Cheers,
:M:
Am 15.03.2010 um 06:45 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com
:
Am 14.03.2010 um 23:42 schrieb Ben Wilson:
Just my two cents. I think at
Am 15.03.2010 um 08:16 schrieb Dr. Michael Lauer:
Well, former Openmoko CEO of marketing always said there is one state
file to rule them all - does that hold no longer?
Yes, storing the device type and modifications in one file *is one
state file* that rules all the detailled settings :)
On Monday 15 March 2010, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote:
Well, former Openmoko CEO of marketing always said there is one state
file to rule them all - does that hold no longer?
I don't think it ever did, no matter what anyone may have said. Person to
person variations are enough to make this so in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 15.03.2010 08:16, schrieb Dr. Michael Lauer:
Well, former Openmoko CEO of marketing always said there is one state
file to rule them all - does that hold no longer?
It was never like this. I always hat do edit the state-files. Even the
Em 13-03-2010 17:48, Timo Jyrinki escreveu:
Mic Sidetone Mux: 'Mic 2' = the correct setting, please try to not
spread misinformation that it'd be wrong simply because it happens to
also increase the volume and therefore buzzing as well if other
settings are high
Mic 2: '3' (= 0dB)
Mono
Just my two cents. I think at this point distributions' defaults
should be towards A7 users, since all new users are anyway A7 users
and A5/A6 owners by now are surely aware of the ALSA setting
problematics.
Hi,
If it really depends on the Ax model I think they should be somehow
Just my two cents. I think at this point distributions' defaults
should be towards A7 users, since all new users are anyway A7 users
and A5/A6 owners by now are surely aware of the ALSA setting
problematics.
Hi,
If it really depends on the Ax model I think they should be somehow
Am 14.03.2010 um 23:42 schrieb Ben Wilson:
Just my two cents. I think at this point distributions' defaults
should be towards A7 users, since all new users are anyway A7 users
and A5/A6 owners by now are surely aware of the ALSA setting
problematics.
Hi,
If it really depends on the Ax
Hi,
I just bought myself A7+ FreeRunner since my A5 started to have its
USB port breaking, buzz fix faltering, display problematic, plastic
case pins broken etc. (1,5+ years of very heavy use:)). I just noticed
that A7 requires much lower microphone settings than A5, something
known but often
Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I just bought myself A7+ FreeRunner since my A5 started to have its
USB port breaking, buzz fix faltering, display problematic, plastic
case pins broken etc. (1,5+ years of very heavy use:)). I just noticed
that A7 requires much lower
20 matches
Mail list logo
