---BeginMessage---
Dear Pieter,
We're sorry to bring you bad news, but your developer room request
for FOSDEM 2010 on behalf of the openmoko project has not
been accepted.
We realize that this must be disappointing news, but unfortunately we
don't have a sufficient number of rooms to our
http://fosdem.org/2010/list-devrooms-their-call-talks
Looking at this list, I really wonder about the criteria these folks
use... *shakes head*
:M:
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
) Pascal Bleser l...@fosdem.orghttp://www.fosdem.org
/\\ FOSDEM 2010 :: 6 + 7 February 2010 in Brussels
_\_v Free and Opensource Software Developers European Meeting
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/FOSDEM-2010-Devroom-for-openmoko-declined-tp4097204p4097231.html
Sent
this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/FOSDEM-2010-Devroom-for-openmoko-declined-tp4097204p4097251.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http
:
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/FOSDEM-2010-Devroom-for-openmoko-declined-tp4097204p4097264.html
Sent from the Openmoko
2009/12/2 PieterC freep...@gmail.com:
I do not think we should shake our heads (please don't ;-) ). We should team
up with the mobile and embedded guys and do our thing.
Definitely! I'm not sure about the deadlines, but the sooner the
better. I'm not sure if I should again cover the kernel
6 matches
Mail list logo
