Citando Michele Renda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> So, I think, making pessure to the firm that produce Glamo, is the only
> possibility to get very open our hardware.
>
Given the legal situation, I agree. Let's pester them with a ton of emails! :)
Maybe we could get the FSF and GNU into this as wel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which prompts me to ask: when FIC/OM chose this chip, what was their
> plan? they knew that it had IP strings attached, and yet they chose it
> anyway. They must have had some kind of plan to make it compatible
> with "
>
> Agreed. Why does nobody seem to be addressing/acknowledging this issue
> (or am I just looking in the wrong places)? An April 2008 post on the
> mailing list suggests that SMedia want $15,000 to release the docs under
> NDA to anyone outside of Openmoko employees. If this is the case, and
> nob
> Agreed. Why does nobody seem to be addressing/acknowledging this issue
> (or am I just looking in the wrong places)? An April 2008 post on the
> mailing list suggests that SMedia want $15,000 to release the docs
> under
> NDA to anyone outside of Openmoko employees. If this is the case, and
> n
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> Yes, but you can use it only if you promise that you will not show to
>> others how to use it (NDA)!
>> So, for me is like it doesn't exist!
>>
>
> IF only we had OpenGL on the Freerunner by now, imagine the amazing
> apps we could write .. geeze guys, what a big disapp
> Yes, but you can use it only if you promise that you will not show to
> others how to use it (NDA)!
> So, for me is like it doesn't exist!
IF only we had OpenGL on the Freerunner by now, imagine the amazing
apps we could write .. geeze guys, what a big disappointment the Glamo
is ..
;
--
Ja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juergen Schinker wrote:
> his Graphics chip-set can do 3D Acceleration AFAIK
Yes, but you can use it only if you promise that you will not show to
others how to use it (NDA)!
So, for me is like it doesn't exist!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versio
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 15:19:32 Michele Renda wrote:
>
> I think that before to test something you must to know what are you
> testing. You can not to test a phone and than to say:
>
> Oh... it is stupid, it is not able to prepare me a coffee :)
OM is just not there yet. Be fair, no excuses p
Michele Renda wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Norbert Hartl wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:19 +0200, Michele Renda wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norbert Hartl wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:19 +0200, Michele Renda wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Norbert Hartl wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
> Nobody expected from a mobile ph
Christian Weßel, Mittwoch, 6. August 2008:
> the german online news golem reports about our FR (unfortunaly just
> in german language)
> http://www.golem.de/0808/61507.html
This article is not very good. Aside from some wrong facts, it seems a
bit tendentious to me. Such bad press from a very pop
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 09:36 -0400, Daniel Benoy wrote:
> Yeah, someone who is reviewing this device from the mindset of an end user is
> someone who's producing a useless review. It says 'Not for end users' all
> over its site long before you try to buy one. Are they writing a review for
> peo
> But is it marketed as a phone or not? Yes, it is marketed as a
> phone. Thus, to review it as a phone is only fair.
imo the intended audience was not outlined very clear by om, thus the
snafu with end-user vs developer continues.
what turned me off was the point on the gear icon -- there was
> Oh... it is stupid, it is not able to prepare me a coffee :)
But is it marketed as a phone or not? Yes, it is marketed as a
phone. Thus, to review it as a phone is only fair.
Otherwise, it should've been marketed as a linux computer with a phone
peripheral in it ..
;
--
Jay Vaughan
Yeah, someone who is reviewing this device from the mindset of an end user is
someone who's producing a useless review. It says 'Not for end users' all over
its site long before you try to buy one. Are they writing a review for people
who don't read?
If you ask me, FIC should have shipped the
Michele Renda wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Norbert Hartl wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
>>> This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
>>>
>>> So many mistakes. They bought their Freerunner and wrote the review. I
>>> bet the
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:19 +0200, Michele Renda wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Norbert Hartl wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
> >> This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
> >>
> >> So many mistakes. They bought their Freerun
Christian Weßel said
> Googles English is horrible. :-)
Googles translations are awful in all languages lol
--
Iker Berasaluce
Departamento de Informatica
Fulcrum SA
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Norbert Hartl wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
>> This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
>>
>> So many mistakes. They bought their Freerunner and wrote the review. I
>> bet they haven't tested it for more than
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:35 +0200, Tobias Kündig wrote:
> This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
>
> So many mistakes. They bought their Freerunner and wrote the review. I
> bet they haven't tested it for more than 1 day.
>
Fow how long do you think you should check a device before
writ
This is the worst review I ever read from Golem.
So many mistakes. They bought their Freerunner and wrote the review. I
bet they haven't tested it for more than 1 day.
The funniest thing: They say the icons are bad. i.e. the «gears»-Tab
is not for Settings, it's for the favorites menu. Never hear
Googles English is horrible. :-)
Am Mittwoch, den 06.08.2008, 07:29 -0400 schrieb Charles Pax:
> 2008/8/6 Christian Weßel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi folks,
>
> the german online news golem reports about our FR (unfortunaly
> just in
> german language)
>
2008/8/6 Christian Weßel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi folks,
>
> the german online news golem reports about our FR (unfortunaly just in
> german language)
> http://www.golem.de/0808/61507.html
>
Google translate:
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.golem.de%2F0808%2F61507.html&hl
Hi folks,
the german online news golem reports about our FR (unfortunaly just in
german language)
http://www.golem.de/0808/61507.html
--
mfg/br, christian
Flurstraße 14
29640 Schneverdingen
Germany
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49 5193 97 14 95
Mobile: +49 171 357 59 57
http://wesselch.
24 matches
Mail list logo
