Thanks for the clarification!
Rui
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:56:37AM -0400, Brad Lassey wrote:
Yes, I suppose that would be a bit of a misprint, which I have corrected
to read If you want to cross-compile Fennec and XULRunner for Maemo,
you should first set up scratchbox
Brad Lassey wrote:
On 3/21/2009 2:54 PM, GNUtoo wrote:
I built it too...
but it has issues:
*slow
There have been a lot of performance improvements in beta 1 (with more
coming before release). If its slow on FR, it would be great to get
some profiles so we can know where the hot
Xavier Cremaschi wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra a écrit :
Does it have a sane compile process already? Or is it still the hell on
drugs that I last saw (which was fairly recent)?
I tried for alpha 1 and alpha 2 too, and I failed.
But IIRC Marco Trevisan succeeded (for alpha 1) a long time
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 17:55 +0100, Johny Tenfinger wrote:
I builded Alpha 2 with bitbake some time ago. It has bugs with using
autotools from host machine, but i workarounded it and it worked. Now
i'm trying the same with beta 1. but alpha 2 was really slow... I'm
not expecting Beta 1 to be
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:32 -0400, Brad Lassey wrote:
Al,
Personally, I have never used bitbake, so I'm not sure what that is
doing exactly.
As for the autoconf question, mozilla requires autoconf2.13. You can
specify the path to your autoconf2.13 either by exporting
AUTOCONF=path in
copy and paste)
-Build
make -f client.mk build
Daniel Benoy wrote:
Looks like the hell on drugs according to their wiki.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/Fennec
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Fennec-Beta-1-Released-tp2499202p2507607.html
Sent from
You're oversimplifying a bit.
You're forgetting https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/cs2007q3
Rui
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:05:45AM -0700, blassey wrote:
Out of curiosity, what part of the build process is giving you trouble? It
boils down to this:
-Pull the code
hg clone
Rui,
Those instructions are for setting up a Maemo development environment,
which wouldn't be applicable to someone trying to build for Openmoko.
-Brad
On 3/20/2009 4:50 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
You're oversimplifying a bit.
You're forgetting
To incentive a little more the awesome work you are doing porting
Fennec, there is a cofundos.org bounty for this
once a opkg package is reached
http://openmoko.cofundos.org/project.php?id=156
2009/3/20 Brad Lassey las...@alum.mit.edu:
Rui,
Those instructions are for setting up a Maemo
Really?
Because it says If you want to cross-compile Fennec and XULRunner for
ARM devices, you should first set up scratchbox.
r...@om-gta02:~# grep Processor /proc/cpuinfo
Processor : ARM920T rev 0 (v4l)
Rui
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:29:11AM -0400, Brad Lassey wrote:
Rui,
Those
Now I know nothing about anything, and I've only just read this part of
the thread - but could it not be that the cross compiler and tools setup
by MokoMakefile are used instead when building for the NEO?
- Gunnar
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Really?
Because it says If you want to
Yes, I suppose that would be a bit of a misprint, which I have corrected
to read If you want to cross-compile Fennec and XULRunner for Maemo,
you should first set up scratchbox
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/cs2007q3. The mozilla build
process handles gcc style cross compiles out of
On Friday 20 March 2009, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
You're oversimplifying a bit.
You're forgetting https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/cs2007q3
I just tried:
bitbake fennec
This does a checkout from hg but it fails during configure. It looks like it's
trying to use autoconf2.13 for
Al,
Personally, I have never used bitbake, so I'm not sure what that is
doing exactly.
As for the autoconf question, mozilla requires autoconf2.13. You can
specify the path to your autoconf2.13 either by exporting
AUTOCONF=path in your environment or by specifying AUTOCONF=path in
your
I builded Alpha 2 with bitbake some time ago. It has bugs with using
autotools from host machine, but i workarounded it and it worked. Now
i'm trying the same with beta 1. but alpha 2 was really slow... I'm
not expecting Beta 1 to be usable on FR.
___
Looks like the hell on drugs according to their wiki.
what do you expect from people who put most of their browser's
configuration in a long list of key/value pairs, accessible only via
about:config -- the keys often unreadble and the values even more?
for every advanced setting you have to
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:00:15PM +0100, Xavier Cremaschi wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra a écrit :
Does it have a sane compile process already? Or is it still the hell on
drugs that I last saw (which was fairly recent)?
I tried for alpha 1 and alpha 2 too, and I failed.
But IIRC Marco
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra a écrit :
Does it have a sane compile process already? Or is it still the hell on
drugs that I last saw (which was fairly recent)?
I tried for alpha 1 and alpha 2 too, and I failed.
But IIRC Marco Trevisan succeeded (for alpha 1) a long time ago...
Marco if you read
I can't wait to see how this is on the Freerunner. I tried a version
some months ago, but it was to slow to be worthwhile. It sounds like
there are a lot of speedups in this version.
http://blog.pavlov.net/2009/03/17/fennec-1-beta-1/
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fennec/1.0b1/releasenotes/
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:27:58AM -0800, Ben Hussey wrote:
I can't wait to see how this is on the Freerunner. I tried a version
some months ago, but it was to slow to be worthwhile. It sounds like
there are a lot of speedups in this version.
Looks like the hell on drugs according to their wiki.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/Fennec
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:36:04 you wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:27:58AM -0800, Ben Hussey wrote:
I can't wait to see how this is on the Freerunner. I tried a version
some months
21 matches
Mail list logo
