Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Angus Ainslie
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Rod Whitby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Didier Raboud wrote: Russell Hay wrote: I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly cant see any mentions of license or downloads on their site. Formally, they only have to release the

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Andrew Stephen
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Angus Ainslie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Rod Whitby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Didier Raboud wrote: Russell Hay wrote: I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly cant see any mentions of license or

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Andrew Stephen
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] A quick look for references on the FSF website has not revealed the relevant info, but this issue bit MEPIS back in 2006 and had widespread media coverage: http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS4218186268.html An

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Rod Whitby
Angus Ainslie wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Rod Whitby [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Didier Raboud wrote: Russell Hay wrote: I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly cant see any mentions of license

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-23 Thread Angus Ainslie
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Rod Whitby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you purchase a device from them? The GPL does not require source code availability to just anyone who wants it - the distributor only needs to provide it to those people to whom they distribute the binary. I agree that

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-22 Thread Robin Paulson
2008/9/22 Joseph Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm sure others have seen the Slashdot article, but in case you haven't: http://mobile.slashdot.org/mobile/08/09/21/1730256.shtml I'm just looking forward to being able to download the code to run on one of my phones :) i did. the most interesting

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-22 Thread Russell Hay
I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly cant see any mentions of license or downloads on their site. 2008/9/22 Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/9/22 Joseph Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm sure others have seen the Slashdot article, but in case you haven't:

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-22 Thread Didier Raboud
Russell Hay wrote: I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly cant see any mentions of license or downloads on their site. Formally, they only have to release the source code to their buyers... -- Swisslinux.org − Le carrefour GNU/Linux en Suisse −

Re: Neopwn

2008-09-22 Thread Rod Whitby
Didier Raboud wrote: Russell Hay wrote: I'm assuming they're not intending to release the full code? Certainly cant see any mentions of license or downloads on their site. Formally, they only have to release the source code to their buyers... ... and then that buyer can release it

Neopwn

2008-09-21 Thread Joseph Reeves
I'm sure others have seen the Slashdot article, but in case you haven't: http://mobile.slashdot.org/mobile/08/09/21/1730256.shtml I'm just looking forward to being able to download the code to run on one of my phones :) Joseph ___ Openmoko community