Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-11 Thread Stefan Gojan
Hi, I want to use it with Ubuntu ;) I'm new to the OM community, so I'm wondering if you are the first one who want to build such thing. Isn't there any existing IDE integration for the OM? Lally Singh schrieb: Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already have a

Re: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-08 Thread Lally Singh
Just to clarify, NB would run on a desktop computer, and cross compile for OM. I'm imagining a situation not unlike CW for Palm (I had to dev on that a few years ago). It compiles the code and uploads it to the emulator, which you can run the debugger on. Then you upload it to your OM device,

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-08 Thread Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
Lally Singh ha scritto: Just to clarify, NB would run on a desktop computer, and cross compile for OM. I'm imagining a situation not unlike CW for Palm (I had to dev on that a few years ago). It compiles the code and uploads it to the emulator, which you can run the debugger on. Then you

OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Lally Singh
Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell-GTK mapping. But, now that we're talking about development environments, who'd be interested in using an IDE for developing OM? I was thinking about putting together

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Fabian Off
: Lally Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: List for Openmoko community discussion community@lists.openmoko.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, den 7. Mai 2008, 18:08:27 Uhr Betreff: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM)) Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already have

RE: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Crane, Matthew
What's wrong with Eclipse? It's much more common for embedded IDE's isn't it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lally Singh Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 12:08 PM To: List for Openmoko community discussion Subject: OM IDE (was: Re: Common

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Lally Singh
: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM)) Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell-GTK mapping. But, now that we're talking about development environments, who'd be interested in using an IDE

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
Hmm... KDevelop 4? (it's being reimplemented and is looking super-nifty by now) :) Wednesday 07 May 2008 skrev Lally Singh: Nah, I'd been planning on getting haskell up for OM. They already have a basic ARM target for ghc, and there's already a haskell-GTK mapping. But, now that we're

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Lally Singh
You're welcome to do so :-) I use NB for development for my day job the PhD. I also have no respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual Studio. On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... KDevelop 4? (it's being reimplemented

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Bastian Muck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I don't have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C. But if you prefer Netbeans and you want to write the plugin it's over to you. So when it's finished I will

RE: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Crane, Matthew
To: List for Openmoko community discussion Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM)) Eclipse has a faster widget toolkit, but it tends to be a lot buggier dumber about a lot of things. You end up spending a lot more time fiddling with it to work right than NB

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Lally Singh
IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM)) Eclipse has a faster widget toolkit, but it tends to be a lot buggier dumber about a lot of things. You end up spending a lot more time fiddling with it to work right than NB. The tradeoff w/NB is that it tends to do the right thing

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
Wednesday 07 May 2008 skrev Lally Singh: You're welcome to do so :-) I use NB for development for my day job the PhD. I also have no respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual Studio. Note, please, that i said KDevelop 4, not KDevelop ;) There's a huge difference,

RE: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Crane, Matthew
To: List for Openmoko community discussion Subject: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM)) You're welcome to do so :-) I use NB for development for my day job the PhD. I also have no respect for KDevelop. I think it's almost as terrible as Visual Studio. On Wed, May 7, 2008

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
I use vim, and it is the best IDE I have ever used:) (My point is that it is impossible to get people to agree on one IDE, since we all have different taste and needs) -- Please don't send me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Join the FSF

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
Bastian Muck ha scritto: Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I don't have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C. But if you prefer Netbeans and you want to write the plugin it's over to you. So when it's finished I will install Netbeans, too.

Re: Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Jeremy List
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote: div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedBastian Muck ha scritto: Soulnds like a good idea, even if i preferred Eclipse more ;-). I don't have any problems with Eclipse and use it for Java, PHP and C.

Re: OM IDE (was: Re: Common Lisp for OM (Was: Programming OM))

2008-05-07 Thread Bastian Muck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't know how fast your computer is, but i never had performance issues. Even in a VMWare-Image my Eclipse worked very fine (and I don't think I'm a slow hacker). The only thing, which can be slow is the code-completion. But this can be