On 3/8/07, Nils Faerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Hébert schrieb:
It doesn't seem so bad : my [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows 199bogomips, so at
200MHz 100bogomips seems correct (s3c2440 has the same cpu as s3c2410).
I don't know if the bogomips indication is a value in which we can really
On Friday 09 March 2007 11:07, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
On 3/8/07, Nils Faerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Hébert schrieb:
It doesn't seem so bad : my [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows 199bogomips, so at
200MHz 100bogomips seems correct (s3c2440 has the same cpu as s3c2410).
I don't know if the
On 3/9/07, Siarhei Siamashka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 09 March 2007 11:07, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
On 3/8/07, Nils Faerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Hébert schrieb:
It doesn't seem so bad : my [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows 199bogomips, so at
200MHz 100bogomips seems correct
Hi!
I just had a first quick run on a phase-0 Neo and found that
/proc/cpuinfo only shows ~100 bogomips. On other ARM based platforms
using 2.6.xx kernels I know the bogomips are usually about the same as
the CPU core clock MHz...
Well this might be different here so I just wanted to make sure
It doesn't seem so bad : my [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows 199bogomips, so at
200MHz 100bogomips seems correct (s3c2440 has the same cpu as s3c2410).
I don't know if the bogomips indication is a value in which we can really
trust, these little devices are really efficient even at
100/200bogomips.
5 matches
Mail list logo