Re: Phase 0 devices just running @100MHz?

2007-03-09 Thread pHilipp Zabel
On 3/8/07, Nils Faerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pierre Hébert schrieb: It doesn't seem so bad : my [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows 199bogomips, so at 200MHz 100bogomips seems correct (s3c2440 has the same cpu as s3c2410). I don't know if the bogomips indication is a value in which we can really

Re: Phase 0 devices just running @100MHz?

2007-03-09 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Friday 09 March 2007 11:07, pHilipp Zabel wrote: On 3/8/07, Nils Faerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pierre Hébert schrieb: It doesn't seem so bad : my [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows 199bogomips, so at 200MHz 100bogomips seems correct (s3c2440 has the same cpu as s3c2410). I don't know if the

Re: Phase 0 devices just running @100MHz?

2007-03-09 Thread pHilipp Zabel
On 3/9/07, Siarhei Siamashka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 09 March 2007 11:07, pHilipp Zabel wrote: On 3/8/07, Nils Faerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pierre Hébert schrieb: It doesn't seem so bad : my [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows 199bogomips, so at 200MHz 100bogomips seems correct

Phase 0 devices just running @100MHz?

2007-03-08 Thread Nils Faerber
Hi! I just had a first quick run on a phase-0 Neo and found that /proc/cpuinfo only shows ~100 bogomips. On other ARM based platforms using 2.6.xx kernels I know the bogomips are usually about the same as the CPU core clock MHz... Well this might be different here so I just wanted to make sure

Re: Phase 0 devices just running @100MHz?

2007-03-08 Thread Pierre Hébert
It doesn't seem so bad : my [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows 199bogomips, so at 200MHz 100bogomips seems correct (s3c2440 has the same cpu as s3c2410). I don't know if the bogomips indication is a value in which we can really trust, these little devices are really efficient even at 100/200bogomips.