On 6/6/08, Tom Cooksey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2008 09:45:29 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
the problem is - if you have a nice screen but the engine to power it is
underpowered, you will suffer from complaints of it just being slow then
instead.
I'd like to wave the little
Hi,
(I try to cut out some citations).
this is my dilemma. win with dpi and sharpness, but then lose in
smoothness/speed. i lean a bit to- smoothness myself, but i want to
hear the
peanut gallery so to speak :) (please don't take offence! i'm
seriously about
listening that's why i ask!)
Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but as i said - i'm just looking to see what people think. and why.
i'm very interested in why. why is a vga screen so important? can
you REALLY see all the pixels? can you REALLY read an 8-point font on
that screen at that size? (be honest!). from
Samsung also seems to have no more ((partially) useful) docs about the s3c
series online.
Why not switch to freescale, and get solid arm11 SoCs with more power then
even the samsung pedants and million times used in smartphones of all
vendors? They even have hundreds of sites in documents freely
Am Fr 6. Juni 2008 schrieb Flemming Richter Mikkelsen:
When it comes to GTA03, I will not buy one (because I buy the GTA02),
so I will not be the target. Maybe QVGA is a good solution, or maybe it
should be an option when you buy
If I got that right, we just need to tune some of the
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:18:43 +0200 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Hi,
(I try to cut out some citations).
this is my dilemma. win with dpi and sharpness, but then lose in
smoothness/speed. i lean a bit to- smoothness myself, but i want to
hear the
peanut gallery
On 6 Jun 2008, at 23:19, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
...
Let's reverse the question - would you reduce the resolution of your
desktop system?
What do you currently have? 1024*1280 or more?
You can still do everything like writing software, e-mail, web
browsing, gaming.
Probably
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 01:30:43 +0100 Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On 6 Jun 2008, at 23:19, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
...
Let's reverse the question - would you reduce the resolution of your
desktop system?
What do you currently have? 1024*1280 or more?
You can still
it will be better - of course. what' i'm baffled about is why all of a
sudden
here a lot of excellent vision gifted people turn up, whereas in real
life i
never see them... :)
--
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its just that the excellent vision gifted people are
quick question - would you prefer a qvga lcd (save a bit of cost) since
we'e
going to need to software-drive all graphics - the fewer pixels you have
to
fill, the better for speed. i'm really tossing up if the speed of qvga is
worth
the loss of resolution. i'm just not sure.
I have a
On Thursday 05 June 2008 14:32:14 rakshat hooja wrote:
The N95 is also good when you look at it on its own and one has no problems
reading anything but when kept next to the Neo 1973 and Sharp 903 one can
tell the display is not in the same league. (the Sharp is also visible in
the sun though
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:32 AM, rakshat hooja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quick question - would you prefer a qvga lcd (save a bit of cost) since
we'e
going to need to software-drive all graphics - the fewer pixels you have
to
fill, the better for speed. i'm really tossing up if the speed of
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
