Le mardi 26 août 2008 à 15:24 +0200, arne anka a écrit :
> > I don't think so :
>
> did you compare the files?
> i gather the naming derives from the gps location data, thus the file
> names for the same areas should be the same regardless of the format being
> different.
> similar names are n
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 15:44 +0200, Jelle De Loecker wrote:
> Sorry for crashing this discussion, but could you clarify why there
> would be a difference between a png saved by tangogps and locations?
>
> If they both use the exact same areas, the exact same name, and they
> both save it as a png
Png's have metadata, but not sure if it's used by the apps.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jelle De
Loecker
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:44 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: TangoGPS and Loca
> Sorry for crashing this discussion, but could you clarify why there
> would be a difference between a png saved by tangogps and locations?
i wouldn't know -- i don't use locations.
but why shouldn't there be _no_ difference?
> If they both use the exact same areas, the exact same name, and they
Sorry for crashing this discussion, but could you clarify why there
would be a difference between a png saved by tangogps and locations?
If they both use the exact same areas, the exact same name, and they
both save it as a png then it *should* be compatible. Anything else
seems way too crazy,
> I don't think so :
did you compare the files?
i gather the naming derives from the gps location data, thus the file
names for the same areas should be the same regardless of the format being
different.
similar names are not sufficient, as said above -- compare the files
(identify -verbose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
1. There is not standard for offiline map archiving, so why be surprised
if some open programs use a their format to archive data?
The important is that the way how they archive the maps is full open and
fully documented.
2. Google maps are not your
Le mardi 26 août 2008 à 13:30 +0200, Michele Renda a écrit :
> The maps used by locations, are vectioral maps?
> >
> > from what i can tell, locations stores the maps in it's own format,
> > which is not compatible with tango, which directly uses the png files
> > supplied by osm:
I don't th
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Michele Renda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The maps used by locations, are vectioral maps?
>
> Thank you
> Michele Renda
>
> robin paulson wrote:
> > julien cubizolles wrote:
> >> Would it be possible for TangGPS a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The maps used by locations, are vectioral maps?
Thank you
Michele Renda
robin paulson wrote:
> julien cubizolles wrote:
>> Would it be possible for TangGPS and Locations to share osm maps ? If
>> not, where does Locations store its (I'd like to backu
julien cubizolles wrote:
> Would it be possible for TangGPS and Locations to share osm maps ? If
> not, where does Locations store its (I'd like to backup them in case of
> flashing)
>
from what i can tell, locations stores the maps in it's own format,
which is not compatible with tango, which d
11 matches
Mail list logo
