There is no need to volunteer to edit a wiki ! It is based on trust. Just
do what you think is obviously needed. If someone disagree they will simply
revert your changes.
I don't think forking is a good idea, we still have not completely moved
the content from the old wiki to this new wiki.
> I'd love to volunteer to tidy the wiki up. Also, it might be better to just
> fork the openmoko wiki and make another one (Since the GNU FDL allows it, and
> the 'openmoko' URL isn't entirely appropriate if we're talking about
> Debian+Android running on a Treo, as an example.) How would all
ko' URL isn't entirely appropriate if we're talking about
> Debian+Android running on a Treo, as an example.) How would all of you feel
> about that?
>
> P.S. I agree with the sentiment below. As well, developers and power users
> with special applications n
an example.) How would all of you feel
about that?
P.S. I agree with the sentiment below. As well, developers and power users
with special applications need detailed documentation even on mainstream phones.
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 13:47:08 steve wrote:
> Perfectly put
>
>
>
>
As Sean said , I really need more time to improve wiki .
1.Test cases is for Openmoko test team. I put it on main page , let them
easy to find that. (That's why ). Yes, 90% of users won't use this link.
I will discuss with our test team. Change the link to somewhere else.
2.Yes, from the very be
Perfectly put
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:37 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: WIKI still a POS
Maybe you are not happy because you think it's just a phon
Okay -- I see your perspective and I agree but I think people are
calling it "a phone" because that's a convenient handle. For my 10
minute test yesterday it worked just like a phone. I dialed, it
connected. It rang, I answered. Another 10 minutes and I'd probably
know how to answer on the first tr
Maybe you are not happy because you think it's just a phone. To me
it's a complete programmable handheld computer which happens to have a
GSM phone feature. The phone is a fairly insignificant feature for
some of us. If all you want is a phone, go to the supermarket, they
have really nice ones ther
You misunderstand. A PHONE should need no documentation. The Neo is
more than a phone. So, some features may need some documentation.
But the phone part of it should just work.
But really, I'm having trouble thinking of a feature I would use
regularly that would be acceptable to require documen
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Luke Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then your co-workers should get iPhones! I thought OpenMoko was for
> those of us who would embrace a machine with a learning-curve for extra
> capability. Probably the same crowd who uses Linux on the desktop.
I read so
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Steven ** <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A phone that NEEDS documentation is a POS.
>
> In my mind, the Neo won't be ready for end-users unless I can give it
> to one of my co-workers and they can figure almost everything out
> without documentation.
>
> -Steven
If y
Steven ** wrote:
> A phone that NEEDS documentation is a POS.
>
> In my mind, the Neo won't be ready for end-users unless I can give it
> to one of my co-workers and they can figure almost everything out
> without documentation.
>
Then your co-workers should get iPhones! I thought OpenMoko was
A phone that NEEDS documentation is a POS.
In my mind, the Neo won't be ready for end-users unless I can give it
to one of my co-workers and they can figure almost everything out
without documentation.
-Steven
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A phone without us
A phone without usable documentation is a door stop.
Scott
Robert Schuster wrote:
I was under the impression that OpenMoko is a company about selling a
mobile phone not a community Wiki ...
Regards
Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Hi,
Scott schrieb:
> [snip]
I was under the impression that OpenMoko is a company about selling a
mobile phone not a community Wiki ...
Regards
Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Openmoko community mailing list
communit
y, July 28, 2008 8:04 AM
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: WIKI still a POS
Vinc,
I agree there have been some improvements.
But the main page is still really broken! I would love to see this
project succeed beyond the usual "Only for Geeks" Linix/OS project.
They way it
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 6:17 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: WIKI still a POS
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 07:11:01AM -0600, Scott wrote:
> The OM Wiki is still a prime example of 'How not to do a Wiki".
>
> a few easy example on the main page.
Well
Sean,
OK, I'll hop off the box for now.
And thanks for letting us know you folks are aware of the problem and
working on it.
Scott
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
> On 7/28/08 Scott Derrick wrote:
>> I agree there have been some improvements.
>>
>> But the main page is still really broken! I would lov
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Mike Baroukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May I suggest to replace the internal search with a search on google ?
> (something like "site:wiki.openmoko.org what-i-search").
I once configured a MediaWiki we were using for internal documentation
at a place I worked to
On 7/28/08 Scott Derrick wrote:
> I agree there have been some improvements.
>
> But the main page is still really broken! I would love to see this
> project succeed beyond the usual "Only for Geeks" Linix/OS project.
>
> They way it is now the state of the documentation for a normal user
> is
Vinc,
I agree there have been some improvements.
But the main page is still really broken! I would love to see this
project succeed beyond the usual "Only for Geeks" Linix/OS project.
They way it is now the state of the documentation for a normal user is a
guarantees it is doomed to be a very
You should know it's improved significantly over the last couple
weeks. To me it seems the Getting Started page in particular has been
much improved. (That's where I've spent most of my time.)
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The OM Wiki is still a prime example
I had a FR on friday and I can configure that finding informations on
the wiki is hard.
May I suggest to replace the internal search with a search on google ?
(something like "site:wiki.openmoko.org what-i-search").
> Well, it *is* a wiki... feel free to fix it
I personaly think that this is t
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 07:11:01AM -0600, Scott wrote:
> The OM Wiki is still a prime example of 'How not to do a Wiki".
>
> a few easy example on the main page.
Well, it *is* a wiki... feel free to fix it.
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: [EMAIL PROTECTED] carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.
24 matches
Mail list logo
