Mike Hodson wrote:
Why not reply to all? Because im rather sure I don't want to reply to
the author twice
Well, I want you to reply to me twice, reason being that one copy goes
into my openmoko folder and the other goes into my inbox. This way,
I know this is not just another boring email in the
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 03:29:33PM -0400, hank williams wrote:
[...]
A bad idea that most other high volume mailing lists do.
[...]
A bad idea that most other high volume mailing lists do.
[...]
50 billions of flies eat shit, they can't be wrong...
The majority doesn't always now the best
Until my mail client gives me a reply to list ONLY command, I vote
for changing reply-to to BE THE LIST.
My email client has a reply to list. I use KMail.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
PM
To: Rod Whitby
Cc: OpenMoko
Subject: Re: Fwd: mailing list management
Do the people suggesting these changes
think that they really know better about how this list should be
set up?
Yup.
___
OpenMoko community mailing
and over.
Cheers,
Dean
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hank
williams Sent: Tuesday, 14 August 2007 10:22 PM
To: Rod Whitby
Cc: OpenMoko
Subject: Re: Fwd: mailing list management
Do the people
hank williams wrote:
Oops. As usual I hit reply to and it went to casey personally
Its broken.
Just so that the 'silent majority' don't lose out on this one, I would
like to point out that there are approximately 1,500 people subscribed
to this list. Can we assume that unless we hear from
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, 14 August 2007 4:26 PM
To: OpenMoko
Subject: Re: Fwd: mailing list management
so I suggest we leave it as it is.
Cheers,
Jim
. I
read the page that was linked, suggesting that's a bad idea, and I
disagree.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:26 PM
To: OpenMoko
Subject: Re: Fwd: mailing list management
hank williams
Dean Collins wrote:
Lol - yep shortly followed by the human race all moving back to wearing
skins and living in rock caves.
Actually, filtering on Subject is the caveman thing to do. :-)
The following headers are *specifically* added by the mailing list
software to enable you to accurately
Jim McDonald wrote:
Just so that the 'silent majority' don't lose out on this one, I would
like to point out that there are approximately 1,500 people subscribed
to this list. Can we assume that unless we hear from them their vote is
'no change'? There are pros and cons to each system, but
Do the people suggesting these changes
think that they really know better about how this list should be set up?
Yup.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Look I'll vote for not changing the subject line; headers are
wonderful for sorting.
However, when I wish to reply -to the list-, I get a choice of either
-to the sender- or -to the list, sender AND anyone else the bloody
sender sent it to- instead of simply replying -to the list-.
While the
Mike Hodson wrote:
Why not reply to all? Because im rather sure I don't want to reply to
the author twice (as he apparently is on the list) and I don't want to
reply to anyone else the author sent the mail to. There appears to be
no other way to use this client than simply 1 or all, not
13 matches
Mail list logo
