Fabian Off wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Mikko J Rauhala:
You can do nice things with your own persistently available server, yes,
but one shouldn't be necessary to mostly enjoy OpenMoko. You mentioned a
web gateway; I assume you mean a web proxy that's tunable to eg.
recompress im
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Mikko J Rauhala:
> You can do nice things with your own persistently available server, yes,
> but one shouldn't be necessary to mostly enjoy OpenMoko. You mentioned a
> web gateway; I assume you mean a web proxy that's tunable to eg.
> recompress images smaller
You can do nice things with your own persistently available server, yes,
but one shouldn't be necessary to mostly enjoy OpenMoko.
Of course, it shouldn't need it, but an associated distro / dedicated app
for computers may unleash features. And can become a paid service if you
don't want to run
On ti, 2007-02-06 at 12:24 +, Florent THIERY wrote:
> The best would be:
> - using a plain text protocol : irc would be great, but prevents
> further extension (webcam over ip or voip), so SIP might be better
Yes, irc is notoriously inflexible. Thus my wish for Jabber. As for SIP,
I don't thi
-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Florent
THIERY
Sent: Tuesday, 6 February 2007 7:25 AM
To: Gabriel Ambuehl
Cc: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Text messaging on the OpenMoko platform
My opinion
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 12:16:12 Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 February 2007 10:56:37 Sergio Bessa wrote:
> > What if we could have Jabber support in OpenMoko and use some sort of
> > transport/relay to connect to legacy protocols? Don't you think this
> > would work? This way wwe only
Hi, i'll add my 2 cents :)
Then again, while XMPP is quite nice for normal usage on the net, maybe we
need a different protocol, namely one that is VERY bandwidth efficient
(XML
is not really famous for that, a binary protocol could potentially do much
better) to keep GPRS costs low?
The best
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 12:06:08 you wrote:
> It woud be great to keep a clean, well known messaging protokoll at the
> base. For reducing the bandwidth usage, I would have two ideas in mind:
> - gzip the xml communication (like soap Web-Services over HTTP do).
> - Use the binary XML-Representa
Hi Gabriel.
Gabriel Ambuehl schrieb:
> On Tuesday 06 February 2007 10:56:37 Sergio Bessa wrote:
>
>> What if we could have Jabber support in OpenMoko and use some sort of
>> transport/relay to connect to legacy protocols? Don't you think this
>> would work? This way wwe only needed one protocol i
On ti, 2007-02-06 at 09:56 +, Sergio Bessa wrote:
> As most of you might know there are transports that make it possible to
> connect to MSN / ICQ [...] What if we could have Jabber support in OpenMoko
> and use some sort of transport/relay to connect to legacy protocols?
> Don't you think thi
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 10:56:37 Sergio Bessa wrote:
> What if we could have Jabber support in OpenMoko and use some sort of
> transport/relay to connect to legacy protocols? Don't you think this
> would work? This way wwe only needed one protocol implementation.
Sure. Many of the public Jab
Just a comment abou Jabber usage.
As most of you might know there are transports that make it possible to
connect to MSN / ICQ through Jabber and that is being used by
several companies to leverage IM services compatible with legacy systems.
I'm currently working with one myself :) I'm usi
Hi,
I just wanted to chime in on the discussion about IM support and text
messaging in general. For clarity's sake I'll start a new thread with a
relevant subject line.
First of all I'd like to say that, at least here in Finland integrated IM
protocol support would be the killer applic
13 matches
Mail list logo
