On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
3) update Qi with dfu-util
qi built here
http://build.shr-project.org/shr-unstable/images/om-gta02/
is still using jffs2 in kernel params
but you can you binary from here
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Thanks for sharing. How's speed and reliability for ubifs? I wonder
whether it's worth the hassle to switch, given that SD access should be
even faster and much more convenient.
I'm using UBIFS in my hybrid OM2008 (still :P) based distro for some
months; In my
could you make a wikientry with step by step-instructions for interested
peobles (like me?)
how much faster it is about?
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
I just understand, that its wrong to test via boniee++ with default
params, which required write 300Mb data, neo have mtd just 256mb, and
both fs becomes **very** slow near ENOSPC.
So, I rerun all tests with -s 32 -m 16, also I tested ext3, and ext2
in sync/async mode.
=== ubifs ===
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:37:14PM +0100, Christoph Mair wrote:
Ah great!, thanks
Remember that ubi0:rootfs specifies the volume name. The current ubinize.cfg
sets this name to om-gta02-rootfs, so change this to ubi0:om-gta02-rootfs
I've removed some UBI debug after max_posedon request and
[sent again to reach the mailing lists]
On Sunday 03 January 2010 13:11:52 Martin Jansa wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 09:25:57PM +0100, Christoph Mair wrote:
Hello,
I tried to use SHR the ubi images on my freerunner, but they did not
work. Does someone know the parameters which are
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:37:14PM +0100, Christoph Mair wrote:
Quote from http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubi.html#L_subpage:
Indeed, let's consider a NAND flash with 128KiB eraseblocks and 2048-byte
pages. If it does not have sub-pages, UBI puts the the VID header at physical
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 09:25:57PM +0100, Christoph Mair wrote:
Hello,
I tried to use SHR the ubi images on my freerunner, but they did not work.
Does someone know the parameters which are passed to mkfs.ubifs? I think that
the ubi fileystem is created for NAND flashes with subpage
Hello,
I tried to use SHR the ubi images on my freerunner, but they did not work.
Does someone know the parameters which are passed to mkfs.ubifs? I think that
the ubi fileystem is created for NAND flashes with subpage support, but this
feature does not work on the freerunner. Passing -s 2048
Thanks for sharing. How's speed and reliability for ubifs? I wonder
whether it's worth the hassle to switch, given that SD access should be
even faster and much more convenient.
Cheers,
--
:M:
___
Openmoko community mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo
