Re: USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Sebastian Billaudelle writes: >> There is no such thing as an "USB 2.0 cable". It is called "USB >> cable". There is no difference between a cable used for USB 1.0, 1.1 >> or 2.0. > >Yes, there is! With USB 1.x you afaik can use longer cables! But >normally you are right. For normal use there is no

Re: USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread Sebastian Billaudelle
That's what I meant... Am Sonntag, den 06.04.2008, 23:29 +0200 schrieb Flemming Richter Mikkelsen: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sebastian Billaudelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > There is no such thing as an "USB 2.0 cable". It is called "USB > > cable". There is no difference

Re: USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sebastian Billaudelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There is no such thing as an "USB 2.0 cable". It is called "USB > cable". There is no difference between a cable used for USB 1.0, 1.1 > or 2.0. > > Yes, there is! With USB 1.x you afaik can use longer cables

Re: USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread Sebastian Billaudelle
> There is no such thing as an "USB 2.0 cable". It is called "USB > cable". There is no difference between a cable used for USB 1.0, 1.1 > or 2.0. Yes, there is! With USB 1.x you afaik can use longer cables! But normally you are right. For normal use there is no difference! cheers Sebastian sig

Re: USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread Alexander Frøyseth
Joe Pfeiffer skrev: Alexander Fr?yseth writes: Why is it USB 1.1 on the neo, and not USB 2.0? It is cheaper to buy a USB 2.0 cable, than a card reader. The processor on the neo isn't able to support 2.0. ___ Openmoko community mailing list c

Re: USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread Alexander Frøyseth
Hehe Forgot to tell that I will use USB to transfere files from PC to Neo, insted of WiFi and SD cards Flemming Richter Mikkelsen skrev: On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Alexander Frøyseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why is it USB 1.1 on the neo, and not USB 2.0? The CPU on the Freerun

Re: USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread joerg
Am So 6. April 2008 schrieb Alexander Frøyseth: > Why is it USB 1.1 on the neo, and not USB 2.0? > It is cheaper to buy a USB 2.0 cable, than a card reader. > > Alexander Frøyseth The 24xx CPU does not support USB2.0 speed, 64xx, which we probably will see on GTA03, will have USB2.0 cheers jOER

Re: USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Alexander Frøyseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why is it USB 1.1 on the neo, and not USB 2.0? The CPU on the Freerunner is not capable of 480Mb/s. I think 14Mb/s was max, but I didn't check it. > It is cheaper to buy a USB 2.0 cable, than a card reader. There is

USB 2.0 insted of USB 1.1

2008-04-06 Thread Alexander Frøyseth
Why is it USB 1.1 on the neo, and not USB 2.0? It is cheaper to buy a USB 2.0 cable, than a card reader. Alexander Frøyseth ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community