done on the FR. Therefore, I'll edit the page with opinions are
divided regarding reliability and no objective comparisons yet for
other criteria.
It'd be much easier to just punt on the whole issue and say same rules
apply as for any other Linux system.
party pooper.
Martin Bernreuther wrote:
again (cmp.
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2009-January/040623.html)...
IMHO, it should be
owner/group concept and permissions (there are even extensions for ACLs) and
linking is a part of a build process (typically after compiling), so maybe
W.Kenworthy wrote:
I have to disagree here - because my own opinion is that ext2/3 are not
the best for every purpose, and are demonstrably a poor choice for OSM
maps on an SD card for instance.
Last I heard reiserfs3 is still being maintained, and it has some real
advantages for OSM maps
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 09:42 +0100, Fernando Martins wrote:
W.Kenworthy wrote:
I have to disagree here - because my own opinion is that ext2/3 are not
the best for every purpose, and are demonstrably a poor choice for OSM
maps on an SD card for instance.
Last I heard reiserfs3 is still
arne anka wrote:
There is a certain amount of YMMV with file system choices depending on
your usage scenarios, but personally I would really like to use reiserfs
and dump ext2/3 and all the problems they cause on the FR (lost
data/corrupted filesystems, slow performance, ...) that I have.
done on the FR. Therefore, I'll edit the page with opinions are
divided regarding reliability and no objective comparisons yet for
other criteria.
It'd be much easier to just punt on the whole issue and say same rules
apply as for any other Linux system.
Stefan
There is a certain amount of YMMV with file system choices depending on
your usage scenarios, but personally I would really like to use reiserfs
and dump ext2/3 and all the problems they cause on the FR (lost
data/corrupted filesystems, slow performance, ...) that I have.
i, on the other
W.Kenworthy wrote:
I have to disagree here - because my own opinion is that ext2/3 are not
the best for every purpose, and are demonstrably a poor choice for OSM
maps on an SD card for instance.
Last I heard reiserfs3 is still being maintained, and it has some real
advantages for OSM maps
Hi,
Based on list feedback, I have rewritten my former proposal for a wiki
page dealing with the choice of file system for sd cards. If you feel so
inclined, please review the text below before I put it on the wiki. I
was thinking to link it from the FAQ page, under Storage, modulus a
better
systems. Since not many people are recommending reiserfs nowadays due to
lack of maintenance, regardless of being considered better than ext2/3,
ext3 remains as the choice.
it's not only lack of maintenance and reiserfs is not considered to be
better (by whom?)!
the best you could say is,
arne anka wrote:
systems. Since not many people are recommending reiserfs nowadays due to
lack of maintenance, regardless of being considered better than ext2/3,
ext3 remains as the choice.
it's not only lack of maintenance and reiserfs is not considered to be
better (by whom?)!
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 1. Februar 2009 schrieb Fernando Martins:
It is also important to note that ext is faster than FAT (benchmark,
anyone?) but, most importantly, it supports permissions, which FAT
doesn't. Of course, since FR is in general a single user device, the
permissions might be not so
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, arne anka wrote:
systems. Since not many people are recommending reiserfs nowadays due to
lack of maintenance, regardless of being considered better than ext2/3,
ext3 remains as the choice.
it's not only lack of maintenance and reiserfs is not considered
13 matches
Mail list logo
