Re: Qtmoko repos

2010-12-15 Thread Alishams Hassam
how dangerous it might be to change to squeeze repos. I'm > >> not thinkig about an apt-get dist-upgrade, > > I do this all the time and yes it's sometimes a PITA to use plain debian apps with the finger but it all usually installs and runs perfect :D -- Alishams Has

Re: Qtmoko repos

2010-12-15 Thread Michele Brocco
On 12/15/10, Patryk Benderz wrote: > Dnia 2010-12-14, wto o godzinie 19:31 -0600, Kosa pisze: >> He there! First of all THANK YOU for working on qtMoko. It works great. >> >> Next, I wonder how dangerous it might be to change to squeeze repos. I'm >> not think

Re: Qtmoko repos

2010-12-15 Thread Patryk Benderz
Dnia 2010-12-14, wto o godzinie 19:31 -0600, Kosa pisze: > He there! First of all THANK YOU for working on qtMoko. It works great. > > Next, I wonder how dangerous it might be to change to squeeze repos. I'm > not thinkig about an apt-get dist-upgrade, Well, I do not know if it

Qtmoko repos

2010-12-14 Thread Kosa
He there! First of all THANK YOU for working on qtMoko. It works great. Next, I wonder how dangerous it might be to change to squeeze repos. I'm not thinkig about an apt-get dist-upgrade, but there are a few apps (like pidgin) I would like to get from there. Thanks in advance. Kosa - Un

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-07 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/9/5 Markus Törnqvist : > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:45:08AM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: https://tuxbrain.org/websvn/ >>> >>> Hooray! >> >>Hi ssh+svn through a public key maybe is the most comfortable option, >>so send me a private mail with user name do you want i and a pub

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-04 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:45:08AM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: >>>https://tuxbrain.org/websvn/ >> >> Hooray! > >Hi ssh+svn through a public key maybe is the most comfortable option, >so send me a private mail with user name do you want i and a public >key >to generate the key(Markus

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-02 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/9/2 Markus Törnqvist : > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:09:30AM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: > [...] >>course make at least a devel om-showrom site :P but here is one step >>more of this long road. >>https://tuxbrain.org/websvn/ > > Hooray! > >>also access to svn though ssh or https

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-02 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/9/2 Risto H. Kurppa : > http://www.samsungapps.com/ > > - they're copying us! LOL, is a GPL project they are allowed to do it meanwhile they get access to the original source :) jokes a part , this can be a source of inspiration , lets see if they provide innovative ideas or will be only a li

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-02 Thread Risto H. Kurppa
http://www.samsungapps.com/ - they're copying us! David: great to see the svn! r -- | risto h. kurppa | risto at kurppa dot fi | http://risto.kurppa.fi ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mail

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-01 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:00:01PM +0100, Joao Pinto wrote: >> I'm pretty sure we went over this somewhere bit looking at sqlite3 getdeb.db >> and .schema I can't find a relation between package and application! >> There's application.source_package VARCHAR(128) and package.source >> VARCHAR(64) >

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-01 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:09:30AM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: [...] >course make at least a devel om-showrom site :P but here is one step >more of this long road. >https://tuxbrain.org/websvn/ Hooray! >also access to svn though ssh or https are setup and working but I >have to fig

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-01 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/9/1 Risto H. Kurppa : > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, David Reyes Samblas > Martinez wrote: >> Most of them are only one line description and sure can be used as >> short description for lists but I thing they are poor for fill an the >> detailed app description, nevertheless we can use them

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-01 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
I CC'd our friend Joao on this :) On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:40:39PM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: >>>So what's the thing with descriptions? Do they have to be filled in >>>manually - no changes of using some importer script there too? >>>Screenshots need to be added manually of cour

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-01 Thread Risto H. Kurppa
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: > Most of them are only one line description and sure can be used as > short description for lists but I thing they are poor for fill an the > detailed app description, nevertheless we can use them as > initialization of descriptio

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-01 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/9/1 Markus Törnqvist : > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:54:46AM +0300, Risto H. Kurppa wrote: >> >>Now >>a) filter all libraries away >>b) maybe filter away files with no proper .desktop file.. > > Yeah, common sense ftw, maybe some libraries may or may not be > relevant to our interests, but we'

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-09-01 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:54:46AM +0300, Risto H. Kurppa wrote: > >Now >a) filter all libraries away >b) maybe filter away files with no proper .desktop file.. Yeah, common sense ftw, maybe some libraries may or may not be relevant to our interests, but we'd figure those out. Do you have a guess

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-31 Thread Risto H. Kurppa
>> Just wondering what's happening :) > the 8215 packages from all, armv4t and gta-02 from shr-unstable parsed > successfully using the latest changes of Joao :) WOW David, this is awesome Now a) filter all libraries away b) maybe filter away files with no proper .desktop file.. Or somethin

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-31 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:19:07PM +0100, Joao Pinto wrote: >Hello, >sorry but I need to quit the list, it has more traffic than I can handle :( Heh, I ignore threads that don't look relevant to the showroom, but sure :) >Please feel free add me on the cc whenever you would like to have my input.

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-31 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:23:50AM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: >> Just wondering what's happening :) >the 8215 packages from all, armv4t and gta-02 from shr-unstable parsed >successfully using the latest changes of Joao :) Wonderful news! What's the next step then? Set something u

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-31 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/8/31 Markus Törnqvist : > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 09:00:44AM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: >> >>Joao, has those fix been uploaded to the bzr repo? > > Have you checked it out? > > Just wondering what's happening :) the 8215 packages from all, armv4t and gta-02 from shr-unstable p

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-31 Thread Joao Pinto
Hello, sorry but I need to quit the list, it has more traffic than I can handle :( Please feel free add me on the cc whenever you would like to have my input. I will also be available on IRC as always :) Best regards On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Markus Törnqvist wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 20

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-31 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 09:00:44AM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: > >Joao, has those fix been uploaded to the bzr repo? Have you checked it out? Just wondering what's happening :) -- mjt ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@list

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-30 Thread Joao Pinto
> Joao, has those fix been uploaded to the bzr repo? > > -- > David Reyes Samblas Martinez > http://www.tuxbrain.com > Open ultraportable & embedded solutions > Openmoko, Openpandora,  Arduino > Hey, watch out!!! There's a linux in your pocket!!! > > ___

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-30 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/8/29 Joao Pinto : > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Markus Törnqvist wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:27:49PM +0300, Markus T�rnqvist wrote: >>> >>>After all that typing, I say we just remove the encode() call and use >>>utf-8 across the board ;) >> >> The below patch works >> >> ---

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-29 Thread Joao Pinto
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Markus Törnqvist wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:27:49PM +0300, Markus T�rnqvist wrote: >> >>After all that typing, I say we just remove the encode() call and use >>utf-8 across the board ;) > > The below patch works > > --- opkg2sql.py.orig  2009-08-29 13:

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-29 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:27:49PM +0300, Markus T�rnqvist wrote: > >After all that typing, I say we just remove the encode() call and use >utf-8 across the board ;) The below patch works --- opkg2sql.py.orig 2009-08-29 13:46:21.004642989 +0300 +++ opkg2sql.py 2009-08-29 13:46:05.995767671 +03

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-29 Thread Markus T�rnqvist
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:00:06AM +0200, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote: >Am Samstag 29 August 2009 04:31:28 schrieb David Reyes Samblas Martinez: >> the problem persist, so the conversion to ascii doesn't solve it, the >> problematic package description is pyelf-sudoku, it seems that is not >> on

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-29 Thread Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann
Am Samstag 29 August 2009 04:31:28 schrieb David Reyes Samblas Martinez: > the problem persist, so the conversion to ascii doesn't solve it, the > problematic package description is pyelf-sudoku, it seems that is not > on UTF-8 nor ascii, is that posible? > Can any one on SHR mantainers take a look

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-28 Thread Risto H. Kurppa
David, awesome work there! Can't wait to see you release the devel version of the repo. Nice spotting broken pyelf-sudoku, I hope it'll get fixed soon. And I also hope the dpkg-branch could live in the original apt-portal project to avoid too much division. It sound's a bit nasty to me to write

Re: apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-28 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
the problem persist, so the conversion to ascii doesn't solve it, the problematic package description is pyelf-sudoku, it seems that is not on UTF-8 nor ascii, is that posible? Can any one on SHR mantainers take a look on this and fix it?, surelly the origin is in the description on the bb file ,is

apt-portal import opkg repos :) & some comments

2009-08-28 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
Meanwhile the design, and the server is going on I was working on the backend and I hope this will help Attached is the adaptation of apt2sql to work on opkg repositories opkg2sql.py. now at least it provided almost the same information as apt2sql I have succesfuly import the "all" architecture, bu

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-02-01 Thread Mike Crash
y versions to be more friendly with it. And I also recommend to upgrade, because of some notable bud fixes in SVN of E17. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/-debian--e17-from-fso-repos-tp2168121p2254377.html Sent from the Openmoko Community mail

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-26 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> - constant API breakages in e libs, not handled properly by upstream - > so library packages have to be renamed, and upgrade paths provided. And [1] has a simple example what these API breakages cause - one of many. We really don't want this in Debian. [1] http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/c

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-25 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> If someone interested, i have packaged e17 for debian, you can download > it on www.mikecrash.com Maybe you are interested in helping debian pkg-e team in making official packages? The issues are: - large package base, and extremely low manpower in the team; - constant API breakages in e lib

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-23 Thread Mike Crash
.com/-debian--e17-from-fso-repos-tp2168121p2206371.html Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-23 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Mike Crash writes: > This is the same, only newer, source code from e17 official repo, i have But where's the source code for the debian packaging (the ./debian/ subdirectory used with dpkg-buildpackage)? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-23 Thread Mike Crash
; If someone interested, i have packaged e17 for debian, you can download >> it on >> www.mikecrash.com > > How does this relate to the existing e17 package that is in debian? [1] > > Where's the source code to your packages? > -- View this message in context: http

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-23 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
MIke Crash writes: > If someone interested, i have packaged e17 for debian, you can download it on > www.mikecrash.com How does this relate to the existing e17 package that is in debian? [1] Where's the source code to your packages? [1] $ apt-cache show e17 Package: e17 Version: 0.16.999.050+sv

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-23 Thread MIke Crash
If someone interested, i have packaged e17 for debian, you can download it on www.mikecrash.com -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/-debian--e17-from-fso-repos-tp2168121p2205502.html Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-17 Thread Davide Scaini
t;> > from the `apt-get install e17`... then i reinstalled e17 and updated all >> > the packages... now it works but i have no keyboard (just a piece ;-) ) >> > if is there someone listening that uses e17 from fso-alioth repos with >> > success let me know... >

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-16 Thread Davide Scaini
there someone listening that uses e17 from fso-alioth repos with > > success let me know... > > Please read this thread: > > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/smartphones-userland/2009-January/000877.html > > ___ > Openm

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-16 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> solution: i purged all the libraries coming from the deb package and > from the `apt-get install e17`... then i reinstalled e17 and updated all > the packages... now it works but i have no keyboard (just a piece ;-) ) > if is there someone listening that uses e17 from fso-aliot

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-16 Thread Davide Scaini
aries coming from the deb package and from the `apt-get install e17`... then i reinstalled e17 and updated all the packages... now it works but i have no keyboard (just a piece ;-) ) if is there someone listening that uses e17 from fso-alioth repos with success let me know... thanks in advance d O

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-16 Thread
Nikita V. Youshchenko schrieb: >> Hi all, >> I installed e17 from fso repos (i removed the manually installed package >> I was using)... but right now I'm not able to run englightenment_start >> at startup as i did before in my .xsessionrc file because of this error:

Re: [debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-16 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Hi all, > I installed e17 from fso repos (i removed the manually installed package > I was using)... but right now I'm not able to run englightenment_start > at startup as i did before in my .xsessionrc file because of this error: > error while loading shared libraries: libev

[debian] e17 from fso repos

2009-01-16 Thread Davide Scaini
Hi all, I installed e17 from fso repos (i removed the manually installed package I was using)... but right now I'm not able to run englightenment_start at startup as i did before in my .xsessionrc file because of this error: error while loading shared libraries: libevas.so.0: cannot open s

Re: Repos

2009-01-10 Thread Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster
Kosa schrieb: > Yep, you are rigth, but be careful about mixing feeds, it might break > you system. > > Kosa > > - Un mundo mejor es posible - > > Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster escribió: > >> Did i get it right that when adding/removing a feed i can leave >> arch.conf untouched? >> >> ___

Re: Repos

2009-01-10 Thread Kosa
Yep, you are rigth, but be careful about mixing feeds, it might break you system. Kosa - Un mundo mejor es posible - Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster escribió: > Did i get it right that when adding/removing a feed i can leave > arch.conf untouched? > > ___

Repos

2009-01-10 Thread Bernd (Jesus McCloud) Prünster
Did i get it right that when adding/removing a feed i can leave arch.conf untouched? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: current testing repos - endless upgrade?

2008-12-12 Thread Tony Berth
I used 'screen -DR' and went fine Thanks On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:49 AM, wrote: > Hi Tony, > > Tony Berth wrote: > > Dear Group, > > > > if I 'opkg upgrade' once, shouldn't do the same when I reboot and try to > > upgarde one more time? Why does opkg keep 'upgrading'? > > Probably because it's

Re: current testing repos - endless upgrade?

2008-12-11 Thread roguemoko
Hi Tony, Tony Berth wrote: > Dear Group, > > if I 'opkg upgrade' once, shouldn't do the same when I reboot and try to > upgarde one more time? Why does opkg keep 'upgrading'? Probably because it's updating dropbear and you aren't using screen or nohup. Try 'nohup opkg install dropbear' first,

current testing repos - endless upgrade?

2008-12-10 Thread Tony Berth
Dear Group, if I 'opkg upgrade' once, shouldn't do the same when I reboot and try to upgarde one more time? Why does opkg keep 'upgrading'? Thanks Tony ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/l

repos?

2008-11-11 Thread Vinzenz Hersche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hello there, does someone knows what's going wrong with the repos? i read a lot the tip to use testing-repos. so i does it, but as example, i couldn't install anymore openmoko-terminal2, the depency libgobject-2.0-0 isn't anywhere too.