Olivier Berger wrote:
> Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>>>
> Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ?
>
>
>>>is the git
Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>>>
>>> > Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ?
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>is the git log helps you?
>>http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko
Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>>
>> > Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ?
>> >
>>
>
>is the git log helps you?
>http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=log;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable
>
Great.
Would i
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, actually, I had a network problem, and made a false assumption
> on that. opkg does indeed upgrade now the network is configured OK.
>
> > I'm puzzled... How is one supposed to up
Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
>>*) The repository of 2008.8
>> After the building process complete, we also sync the repository[3]
>> People can upgrade from there.
>>
>> [3] http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/O
Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi Community,
>>
>>As I mentioned in the previous mail[1] , we did some works.
>>
>>[1]:http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-August/026491.html
>
> Thanks for this update.
>
>>
>>*) A
Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Community,
>
>As I mentioned in the previous mail[1] , we did some works.
>
>[1]:http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-August/026491.html
Thanks for this update.
>
>*) A new 2008.8 stable image
>
> Holger did some changes
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 08:56 +0930, Rod Whitby wrote:
> digger vermont wrote:
...
> > Okay Rod I give up, I tried searching, where are those Bearstech feeds?
>
> They are still being built, but the fso-testing feed has images and ipks at:
>
> http://shr.bearstech.com/
>
> Others will follow over
digger vermont wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 14:18 +0930, Rod Whitby wrote:
>> Julian Chu wrote:
>>> I am the leader of building stuff.
>>>
> ...
>> Thanks for clearing up this problem.
>>
>> BTW, Bearstech have graciously donated a server instance for building
>> FSO images, and have accepted
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 14:18 +0930, Rod Whitby wrote:
> Julian Chu wrote:
> > I am the leader of building stuff.
> >
...
>
> Thanks for clearing up this problem.
>
> BTW, Bearstech have graciously donated a server instance for building
> FSO images, and have accepted my offer to maintain an a
Julian Chu wrote:
> I am the leader of building stuff.
>
> We did a release in 2008.8 then provide a stable feed.
> Buidhost is a building machine that build many things with
> AUTOREV. That means everything comes from buildhost is *Unstable*
>
> We provide buildhost for the r
Julian Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I am the leader of building stuff.
>
> We did a release in 2008.8 then provide a stable feed.
> Buidhost is a building machine that build many things with
> AUTOREV. That means everything comes from buildhost is *Unstable*
>
> We p
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:34:04AM +0930, Rod Whitby wrote:
> Holger Freyther wrote:
> >> http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/1809
> >>
> >> Please fix that ticket.
> >
> > You are right, this ticket needs to be fixed and it is on the way. One part
> > of
> > the fix would be to remove the dail
Holger Freyther wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 August 2008 23:39:06 Rod Whitby wrote:
>
>> What I do have a problem with is the current situation where buildhost
>> builds a daily feed of updates WHICH ARE INCOMPATIBLE with the latest
>> Openmoko Om2008.08 released image and which cause major confusion
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 23:39:06 Rod Whitby wrote:
> What I do have a problem with is the current situation where buildhost
> builds a daily feed of updates WHICH ARE INCOMPATIBLE with the latest
> Openmoko Om2008.08 released image and which cause major confusion
> amongst your customer base.
steve wrote:
> Rod,
>
> Our QA includes community feedback. If we release early particular elements
> in the community will slam us.
> We expect that. If we hold back releases, other elements of the community
> will slam us.
>
> So we expect to be slammed no matter what we do. Fun job ehh?
>
steve wrote:
> Rod,
>
> Our QA includes community feedback. If we release early particular elements
> in the community will slam us.
> We expect that. If we hold back releases, other elements of the community
> will slam us.
>
> So we expect to be slammed no matter what we do. Fun job ehh?
>
>
.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Whitby
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 8:34 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
Olivier Berger wrote:
> Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Olivier Berger wrote:
> Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> if not, is there a recommended update feed for Om 2008.8 ?
>> http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/
>>
>> There is *no* other feed location for Om2008.08 at the moment, and
>> Openmoko are *not* doing public daily b
Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> if not, is there a recommended update feed for Om 2008.8 ?
>
> http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/
>
> There is *no* other feed location for Om2008.08 at the moment, and
> Openmoko are *not* doing public daily builds of Om2008.08 ...
>
>
Harald Koenig wrote:
> in Om 2008.8 all feeds in /etc/opkg/ go to
>
> http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/
Correct. That is the Om2008.08 feed.
> is it ok to use
>
> http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200808/MMDD/
>
> as update feed for Om 2008.8 ?
Hi,
in Om 2008.8 all feeds in /etc/opkg/ go to
http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/
is it ok to use
http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200808/MMDD/
as update feed for Om 2008.8 ?
if not, is there a recommended update feed for Om 2008.8 ?
thanks,
22 matches
Mail list logo
