Subject: Re: now Koolu makes a phone too ;-)
Date: gio 07 feb 08 11:30:53 -0800
Quoting Michael Shiloh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Yes, Koolu is a distributor.
mmm. They offer pre-order and quote a price of US$399. Available to
developers this March. And the phone becomes a "Works E
Our friend Steve Lake interviewed me the other day:
http://www.raiden.net/?cat=2&aid=374
I'm afraid he caught me just as my two mugs of morning espresso kicked
in, and my sentences are a little long, for which I apologize. Hopefully
you can read past that and sense my enthusiasm for this proje
Yes, Koolu is a distributor.
Michael
Doug Jones wrote:
http://koolu.com/Koolu-WE-Appliance/WE-Phone.html
looks kinda familiar
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
__
On Feb 8, 2008 6:29 AM, Doug Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://koolu.com/Koolu-WE-Appliance/WE-Phone.html
>
> looks kinda familiar
The specs look alike to the letter, you mean...
Christ van Willegen
--
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
_
Can any one suggest me how to use usb host mode with GTA01.
On Feb 6, 2008 11:38 AM, Phani Kumar Kancharala <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes, my plan is to work with a self powered USB hub. Is it possible to
> work with 2.6.22 kernel??
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2008 10:26 PM, Christopher Earl <[EMAIL PROT
Hello
OpenMoko has a wlan chip? Joiku brings in a hostpot:
http://www.computerwelt.at/detailArticle.asp?a=114126&n=1
http://www.joiku.com/?action=products&mode=productDetails&product_id=310
A better idea is to bring in BATMAN protocol for meshed wireless...
https://www.open-mesh.net/batman
So
http://koolu.com/Koolu-WE-Appliance/WE-Phone.html
looks kinda familiar
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
What I want is for a our company's patents to be freely available, for
anyone, but for defensive purposes only.
Aside from patent-commons, which is just a way to allow mutual defense
for fellow FOSS projects (assuming I understood this correctly), what I
know of is to
+1 Good and smart decision from my point of view.
On Feb 8, 2008 11:58 AM, Paul Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Software by its nature is easier to fix than hardware or even
> firmware; this approach does the Right Thing: vendors win
> because the firmware layer just got a whole lot
+1
Software by its nature is easier to fix than hardware or even
firmware; this approach does the Right Thing: vendors win
because the firmware layer just got a whole lot easier to write
and the rest of the world wins because we get as much control
as legally permissible of our hardware.
On Fri
On Feb 7, 2008 4:45 PM, Arthur Britto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What prevents you from mailing yourself an unsealed envelope?
Why would you want to do that? The point is to get a reliable date
stamp associated with the material inside the envelope. And as the
other link pointed out, it doesn'
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 17:35 -0500, Steven Milburn wrote:
> As a first step, get anything you think is patent worthy documented
> and dated. In the US, a common practice is to write up your concept
> and mail it to yourself in a sealed envelope. You don't open the
> envelope until you need to and
captive stylus..anyone? :)
the new N810 stylus looks like it might almost fit!
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Dear Community,
Some of our chips or chipsets contain proprietary firmware in flash
memory. For example, in GTA02 these include the Wi-Fi, GPS, and GSM
chipsets.
Ideally, we would have liked to use chipsets for which even the
firmware code would be free, but they don't exist right now.
So
Hi Openmoko community
Ask everyone at a country fair to guess the weight of an ox and the average will
be closer to the actual value than even the experts. this is one example of
the wisdom of crowds :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wisdom_of_Crowds
So now I think we should apply this t
Wow, good to know! Thanks!
I have thought for a long time that doing this would be a defense because it
would show dated prior art, but the details on that site actually seem more
sensible.
--Steve
On Feb 7, 2008 6:31 PM, Christopher Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgot to add this link. T
This method is called "The poor man's patent" and is not legal. Below is a web
page that may be of some help and describes this patent method as an "Urban
legend" It also has documentation on getting things patented.
http://www.inventionpatent.net/patent/poor-man's-patent.cfm
>>> "Steven Milb
Forgot to add this link. This will outline the American procedure for patenting.
http://www.inventionpatent.net/patent/process.cfm
>>> "Steven Milburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/07/08 5:35 PM >>>
As a first step, get anything you think is patent worthy documented and
dated. In the US, a common pra
On Feb 7, 2008 3:35 PM, Steven Milburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a first step, get anything you think is patent worthy documented and
> dated. In the US, a common practice is to write up your concept and mail it
> to yourself in a sealed envelope. You don't open the envelope until you
Or g
As a first step, get anything you think is patent worthy documented and
dated. In the US, a common practice is to write up your concept and mail it
to yourself in a sealed envelope. You don't open the envelope until you
need to and you do it with a lawyer present. The postmark on the envelope
ho
This sounds like a great idea. I think what you mean is that if a
competitor sues OpenMoko for allegedly infringing its patent, then
OpenMoko can counter-sue saying "BTW you are infringing this one of
ours too" and then it gets settled out-of-court by cross-licensing,
right?
Well I am not too
I think that we all agree here that the patent system is completely broken.
By filling patent, even for defense only, you are playing the rule.
What I've seen so far is that small companies that cannot afford a lawyer
department simply choose to ignore the rules and just ignore completely the
pat
> http://www.patent-commons.org/ is the one that I'm aware of ...
This is what I was referring to...
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
> What I want is for a our company's patents to be freely available, for
> anyone, but for defensive purposes only.
>
> Are there any existing options available to us now? Does anyone know of
> existing companies or organizations with a similar strategy that we can
> seek gu
On Feb 7, 2008 1:00 PM, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I want is for a our company's patents to be freely available, for
> anyone, but for defensive purposes only.
This sounds like a great idea. I think what you mean is that if a
competitor sues OpenMoko for allegedly infringin
what about posting this exact question at groklaw?
On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
Dear Community,
Most of you know that OpenMoko is a fully independent company at
this point. With this great opportunity comes many challenges.
Today I would like to share one with you al
I'd get in touch with the Linux Foundation/Software Freedom Law Center
and discuss their "patent commons" with them. Write me off-list, Sean,
and I can get you in touch with the right folks, I think...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean
M
Dear Community,
Most of you know that OpenMoko is a fully independent company at this
point. With this great opportunity comes many challenges. Today I would
like to share one with you all and ask for some advice.
We need to file patents for our hardware as well as software designs.
While my
I did a quick search & found an input method application already exists
called uim (http://code.google.com/p/uim/wiki/OfficialUserDocument) that
supports a bunch of languages. It appears to be customizable in
behavior & can be used with multiple window systems. It looks like it
could work wit
Shawn Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That looks maintenance-intensive, and pretty soon would tend to be
> long and unwieldy (too many packages); consequently it will tend not
> be very trustworthy, because who's going to keep it updated?
That is a very fair point.
However this page was i
When you port Dfu-util to windows keep all the switches the same(not that i
thought you would change them) and I can write the UI this weekend, It will
call on dfu-util, so any changes to dfu can be easily applied to the UI without
the need to recode anything, let me know the name of your projec
On Thursday 07 February 2008 01:41:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The specs I saw were not in the Wiki. They were at:
>
> http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2393777675.html
>
> Quote:
> Additional Neo FreeRunner specs include:
> Processor -- Samsung S3C2442 500MHz
> RAM -- 128MB
> Flash -- 256MB
>
Sébastien Lorquet wrote:
What I made is reverse engineering. I plan to release it under GPLv3
to be protected from software patents, will this be useful?
I am not a lawyer and all, but I think the answer is "no". The GPLv3
(nor any other copyright license) can protect you if you infringe on
for what I recall, backspace starts by removing *letters* from the last
syllable, then entire syllabes.
Moreover, hitting a directional key like or any key that
changes the caret position terminates composition of the current syllabe.
In fact, when you type, the currently composed syllabe appear
Am Do 7. Februar 2008 schrieb dda:
> I agree that a system of plugins/callbacks could do fine, if it can
> handle "resetting" output: eg typing gks f would output
> successively:
> ㅎ -> 하 -> 한 -> 하 -> 할 [Unicode 0x1112, 0xd558, 0xd55c, 0xd558,
> 0xd560]. Being able to "backtrack" is quite necessa
Sorry for the imprecision, and thanks for the correction. I spoke too fast.
The backtracking should be trivial to implement with my prototype. I'm
cleaning it a little before giving it to you.
I'm also concerned with copyright. Is there any patent problem with this
input method as with T9 (for mo
Well, no. the 11,172 syllables you mention are *not* letters. The fact
that Korean combines letters by syllables [Syllabic blocks in
Wikipedia] doesn't make these syllables "letters". The Korean Keyboard
uses 26 keys for the 33 letters [19 consonants, counting geminated
consonants as separate lette
I don’t really have the equipment to make a custom case myself but I
would definitely be interested in buying one, either from FIC as an
option or from a 3rd party.
I'd want a larger case, maybe 1.3-1.5 times the current size, with a
section of empty space for adding extra electronics. At that
(keeping [EMAIL PROTECTED] and communitylist in the loop)
Hehe,
This is totally understandable. :) We will explain to you the best as we
can.
If you want to make a korean keyboard with a key for each letter then you'll
need a keyboard with...
(sit down before next line)
... 11,172 letters, ie
39 matches
Mail list logo
