Will OpenMoko give any consideration to those of us who purchased the
GTA01 before the tri-band issue was announced, to discount the price of
a GTA02 to give us the functionality we thought we were initially
purchasing? Like a trade-up of some sort like ATI used to do, where you
send in your ol
"Ortwin Regel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/12/08 3:22 PM >>>
> It sounds like Michael was talking about GSM in general. The area not
> covered by that indeed does seem negligible in the US. You have got a
> different issue. From what I picked up, it is not reasonably possible
> to change the hardwa
Vasco Névoa wrote:
> Hi. Sorry to barge in like this, but I don't quite understand the problem to
> begin with...
> Isn't open source code by definition protected against subsequent patents?
> It is part of the patenting process to search for conflicting publications;
> if they find any, then the
Michael,
Thank you for your response, I truly appreciate it. No problem
about the modification. I just wanted to know whether to ever expect such a
thing. Ill be happy to use my GTA02 when I get one. One again thank you for
your response.
>>> Michael Shiloh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/
Hi Christopher, and the entire community,
Christopher Earl wrote:
I read the Raiders Realm interview with Michael Shiloh Here is the excerpt I
will am talking about
"RR: So is all of the hardware you have for this FCC certified and ready to use
on different networks?
MS: Yup. Absolutely.
The GSM 850 is the issue I am addressing
>>> "Ortwin Regel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/12/08 3:22 PM >>>
It sounds like Michael was talking about GSM in general. The area not
covered by that indeed does seem negligible in the US. You have got a
different issue. From what I picked up, it is not reason
It sounds like Michael was talking about GSM in general. The area not
covered by that indeed does seem negligible in the US. You have got a
different issue. From what I picked up, it is not reasonably possible
to change the hardware in a GTA01 to support the 850 Mhz band. The
best option you have i
Vasco Névoa wrote:
Hi. Sorry to barge in like this, but I don't quite understand the problem to
begin with...
Isn't open source code by definition protected against subsequent patents?
Yes, normally patent granting offices do search for prior art, but how
thorough do they seek it?
How do you de
I read the Raiders Realm interview with Michael Shiloh Here is the excerpt I
will am talking about
"RR: So is all of the hardware you have for this FCC certified and ready to use
on different networks?
MS: Yup. Absolutely. Now it is a GSM based phone, both models, which means
they both use a
Hi. Sorry to barge in like this, but I don't quite understand the problem to
begin with...
Isn't open source code by definition protected against subsequent patents?
It is part of the patenting process to search for conflicting publications; if
they find any, then the candidate idea is not a nove
Sébastien Lorquet schrieb:
> This one is based on GTK
>
> http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/9619/access-linux-platform-sdk-released/
>
> What do you think of this?
>
> I'm worried about interoperability. There are a number of different
> Linux platforms now, but nothing guarantees applications
Sébastien Lorquet wrote:
> This one is based on GTK
>
> http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/9619/access-linux-platform-sdk-released/
>
> What do you think of this?
Personally, I'm very pleased.
> I'm worried about interoperability. There are a number of different
> Linux platforms now, but nothing g
This one is based on GTK
http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/9619/access-linux-platform-sdk-released/
What do you think of this?
I'm worried about interoperability. There are a number of different Linux
platforms now, but nothing guarantees applications will be easily portable
across them. So I f
13 matches
Mail list logo