Re: [QtMoko] Translation

2010-10-31 Thread Radek Polak
You wrote: > Den 31-10-2010 11:23, Radek Polak skrev:

> I received some files from you earlier that I'm using to translate into
> Danish but they were as far as I remember taken from the v26 and in the
> mean time there has been v27 and now the experimental has reached v28. I
> just thought there might be new strings that could as well be translated
> now when I'm on to it?

Ahh, oki, IIRC there are no new strings, so no need to worry about it now.

> By the way if I look in
> http://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/tree/translations/i18n/da_DK/ I see
> fewer files than you have send to this group in compressed form?

I will check when you are finished with the translations.

> What I'm/was looking for is a directory always containing the newest
> template of translatable files (in English) that need translation then I
> could download them do the translation and send it back to you.
> 
> P.S. at the moment I'm about 90% through the Danish translation.

Nice!

Regards

Radek

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread Serdar Dere
Hi there, I got this eMail.

I will try to get more information to get a few hours of time for us.

Greetings Serdar

Dear Serdar Dere,

Unfortunately your devroom request for FOSDEM 2011 was declined.
You might have discovered this indirectly already, we are very sorry for 
that. Something went wrong in the sending of the decline-mails, we did 
not wish for this to happen in this way.

To clarify, your request was perfectly valid, but we had to choose. 
Unfortunately we do not have a sufficient number of rooms to our 
disposal to cover all requests.

Nevertheless, there are other ways to participate in FOSDEM too. A call 
for participation will be announced around next week on our website, 
with opportunities to:
- have a stand at FOSDEM,
- hold a FOSDEM lightningtalk in one of the biggest rooms,
- speak in one of the other devrooms.

More specifically, like previous years there will be an 'embedded' 
devroom for all software on embedded and mobile devices.
The contact person is Philippe De Swert , 
contact him if you wish to participate in this devroom.


On behalf of the FOSDEM devroom team,
Tias


Am 31.10.10 11:49, schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer:
> Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 10:48 +0100 schrieb David Lanzendörfer:
>> Seems as we lost our devroom after all.
> Not surprising. That we got it last year was an exception "thanks" to
> Xorg not being able to fill in their slot. Unfortunately FOSDEM
> organizers fail to realize the importance of mobile technologies, hence
> desktop stuff is still set and obviously if you had a room for 'n'
> years, you will have it every year. *sigh*
>
>> Sadly our project is still to small to get a room or so.
>> Dunno.
>> Mickey? Nikolaus? Do you wanna hold your presentation after all?
> Not me. A lightning talk about the state of FSO on foreign hardware
> makes no sense to me and the program of the embedded room seems to be
> fixed to buildsystems, C libraries, and kernel tweakings for years now.
>
> :M:
>
>
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
  Em 31-10-2010 11:23, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller escreveu:
>> Not me. A lightning talk about the state of FSO on foreign hardware
>> makes no sense to me and the program of the embedded room seems to be
>> fixed to buildsystems, C libraries, and kernel tweakings for years now.
> Yes, that is also my impression.
>
> What we can do is to organize our own "virtual devroom". Idea:
>
> * we open a page fosdem2011 on wiki.openmoko.org
> * everyone tries to get a presentation into all relevant devrooms
> -- Mickey @ Telephony
> -- Nikolaus @ Embedded or Lightning
> -- Serdar @ Distribution miniconf
> -- SHR @ Distribution miniconf
> -- etc.
> * on the wiki page we collect the time, location, title etc. to
> provide our own "Openmoko" view into the FOSDEM database...
>
> What do you think?

And have the meetings at nice bars in Brussels center ;)

Rui

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread W. B. Kranendonk
--- On Sun, 10/31/10, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer  
> Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 10:48 +0100 schrieb David Lanzendörfer:
> > Seems as we lost our devroom after all.
> 
> Not surprising. That we got it last year was an exception
> "thanks" to
> Xorg not being able to fill in their slot. Unfortunately
> FOSDEM
> organizers fail to realize the importance of mobile
> technologies, 
Such a pity. I enjoyed the presentations as well as the audience last year 
(wow, are ALL those people fiddling with my phone as well :-) )

> > Sadly our project is still to small to get a room or
> so.
> > Dunno.
> > Mickey? Nikolaus? Do you wanna hold your presentation
> after all?
Last FOSDEM was my first, making me not too familiar with the organisation of 
the event. I did notice that though "we" occupied a couple of buildings, others 
were not in use. Would it be an option to organize a shadow-event nearby? Is 
one of us living near there? Perhaps the Brussel Hackerspace is willing to 
provide room outside FOSDEM-hours? It shouldn't be too far from the main FOSDEM 
event, so there's at least a remote chance of pulling some not-OM-visitors to 
the "event". If there's interest in organizing something like that, I volunteer 
to make phonecalls or send mails after receiving some pointers where to look 
for room.

> (...) the program of the embedded room
> seems to be
> fixed to buildsystems, C libraries, and kernel tweakings
> for years now.
Well, it's FOS-, not FOHWDEM. I hope it will shift towards open hardware more 
and more (there were the RepRap, Arduino and Beagleboard besides OM, perhaps 
others I didn't notice)

Boudewijn



  

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread David Lanzendörfer
>What do you think?
A bit guerilla... But seems to be the only way.
So lets do a presentation visitation guidline for OM-interested people.

best regards
leviathan


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller

Am 31.10.2010 um 11:49 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer:

> Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 10:48 +0100 schrieb David Lanzendörfer:
>> Seems as we lost our devroom after all.

Bad news :(

> Not surprising. That we got it last year was an exception "thanks" to
> Xorg not being able to fill in their slot. Unfortunately FOSDEM
> organizers fail to realize the importance of mobile technologies, hence
> desktop stuff is still set and obviously if you had a room for 'n'
> years, you will have it every year. *sigh*

Yes, they have a different view on all the projects. As far as
I understand there aren't any hardware-centerted devrooms.

>> Sadly our project is still to small to get a room or so.

This may be the main question for the FOSDEM organizers - what exactly is our 
project.
For them it may appear to be something fragmented between Distribution, 
Telephony, Embedded.

For all those components they have separate Devrooms.

>> Dunno.
>> Mickey? Nikolaus? Do you wanna hold your presentation after all?
> 
> Not me. A lightning talk about the state of FSO on foreign hardware
> makes no sense to me and the program of the embedded room seems to be
> fixed to buildsystems, C libraries, and kernel tweakings for years now.

Yes, that is also my impression.

What we can do is to organize our own "virtual devroom". Idea:

* we open a page fosdem2011 on wiki.openmoko.org
* everyone tries to get a presentation into all relevant devrooms
-- Mickey @ Telephony
-- Nikolaus @ Embedded or Lightning
-- Serdar @ Distribution miniconf
-- SHR @ Distribution miniconf
-- etc.
* on the wiki page we collect the time, location, title etc. to 
provide our own "Openmoko" view into the FOSDEM database...

What do you think?

Nikolaus
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [QtMoko] Translation

2010-10-31 Thread Ole Carlsen
Den 31-10-2010 11:23, Radek Polak skrev:
> Ole Carlsen wrote:
>
>> When there is a new official and non-official release could it then be
>> possible to have a compressed file containing the translatable files on
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtmoko/files/ too?
>
> Sorry, i dont understand. What are you trying to achieve? Qtmoko is translated
> to several languages and the translations are in released images. Sources for
> translations are in my git [1]. Is there any problem with this?
>
> Regards
>
> Radek
>
> [1] http://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/tree/translations

I received some files from you earlier that I'm using to translate into 
Danish but they were as far as I remember taken from the v26 and in the 
mean time there has been v27 and now the experimental has reached v28. I 
just thought there might be new strings that could as well be translated 
now when I'm on to it?

By the way if I look in 
http://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/tree/translations/i18n/da_DK/ I see 
fewer files than you have send to this group in compressed form?

What I'm/was looking for is a directory always containing the newest 
template of translatable files (in English) that need translation then I 
could download them do the translation and send it back to you.

P.S. at the moment I'm about 90% through the Danish translation.

-- 
Ole @ Carlsen-web.dk

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [gta04-devel] Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 10:48 +0100 schrieb David Lanzendörfer:
> Seems as we lost our devroom after all.

Not surprising. That we got it last year was an exception "thanks" to
Xorg not being able to fill in their slot. Unfortunately FOSDEM
organizers fail to realize the importance of mobile technologies, hence
desktop stuff is still set and obviously if you had a room for 'n'
years, you will have it every year. *sigh*

> Sadly our project is still to small to get a room or so.
> Dunno.
> Mickey? Nikolaus? Do you wanna hold your presentation after all?

Not me. A lightning talk about the state of FSO on foreign hardware
makes no sense to me and the program of the embedded room seems to be
fixed to buildsystems, C libraries, and kernel tweakings for years now.

:M:



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v28

2010-10-31 Thread Radek Polak
ghislain wrote:

> I'm trying to adjust my installation images to start using ubifs, but I
> encounter the following problem:
> When I use your rootfs (qtmoko-debian-v28.ubi), everyting is fine, but when
> I use my custom rootfs-image I get a kernel panic.
> 
> I think I do something wrong creating the ubi image, I use the following
> commands from your documentation:
> 
> mkfs.ubifs -r /tmp/qtmoko-debian -o qtmoko-debian.ubifs -x zlib -m 2048 -e
> 126976 -c 2047
> ubinize -o qtmoko-debian.ubi -m 2048 -p 128KiB -s 2048 -O 2048 ubinize.cfg
> 
> (using your ubinize.cfg)
> 
> I've also edited the fstab, so I'm clueless now...
> 
> What do I do wrong, or what am I forgetting?

I dont know. I also use just these 2 commands+correct line for ubifs in 
/etc/fstab. One difference could be that i am now doing the releases in qemu 
for ARM processor, but i did the ubifs also on PC and it was working.

Btw have you tried flash the ubi image with dfu-util or is the installer using 
nandwrite?

Otherwise i have taken the instructions for ubifs from here [1] if it can help 
you.

Regards

Radek

[1] http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/UBIFS

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [QtMoko] Translation

2010-10-31 Thread Radek Polak
Ole Carlsen wrote:

> When there is a new official and non-official release could it then be
> possible to have a compressed file containing the translatable files on
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtmoko/files/ too?

Sorry, i dont understand. What are you trying to achieve? Qtmoko is translated 
to several languages and the translations are in released images. Sources for 
translations are in my git [1]. Is there any problem with this?

Regards

Radek

[1] http://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/tree/translations

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Fwd: FOSDEM 2011 Devroom on SHR/FSO declined

2010-10-31 Thread David Lanzendörfer
Seems as we lost our devroom after all.
Sadly our project is still to small to get a room or so.
Dunno.
Mickey? Nikolaus? Do you wanna hold your presentation after all?
You might get a presentation in one of the biggest rooms.
Perhaps you can motivate more devs to help us getting
OpenMoko rule the market again.
And you could also make some advertisement for the presale :-)
(I can't come, because of examina)

best regards
leviathan
--- Begin Message ---

Dear David Lanzendoerfer,

Unfortunately your devroom request for FOSDEM 2011 was declined.
You might have discovered this indirectly already, we are very sorry for 
that. Something went wrong in the sending of the decline-mails, we did 
not wish for this to happen in this way.


To clarify, your request was perfectly valid, but we had to choose. 
Unfortunately we do not have a sufficient number of rooms to our 
disposal to cover all requests.


Nevertheless, there are other ways to participate in FOSDEM too. A call 
for participation will be announced around next week, with opportunities to:

- have a stand at FOSDEM,
- hold a FOSDEM lightningtalk in one of the biggest rooms,
- speak in one of the other devrooms.

More specifically, like previous years there will be an 'embedded' 
devroom for all software on embedded and mobile devices.
The contact person is Philippe De Swert , 
contact him if you wish to participate in this devroom.



On behalf of the FOSDEM devroom team,
Tias
--- End Message ---


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community