Re: openphoenux review on mobilejournal.net

2012-10-31 Thread Boudewijn
On Wednesday 31 October 2012 20:50:02 francesco.dev...@mailoo.org wrote: > Il 31/10/2012 15:42, urodelo ha scritto: > > Reading such kind of reviews disappoint me. > > It disappoints me too, and it is not the first not accurate at all and > generalist review that I read (I suppose it comes immedia

Re: openphoenux review on mobilejournal.net

2012-10-31 Thread Bob Ham
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, francesco.dev...@mailoo.org wrote: > What makes me angry it's that the authors do not > get enough information nor they get a direct contact with the developers > if they not are owners of a GTA0X. The result is a bad article, they do > not even know what they

Re: openphoenux review on mobilejournal.net

2012-10-31 Thread francesco . devita
Il 31/10/2012 15:42, urodelo ha scritto: Reading such kind of reviews disappoint me. It disappoints me too, and it is not the first not accurate at all and generalist review that I read (I suppose it comes immediately after this one [1], in italian). What makes me angry it's that the authors do

Re: openphoenux review on mobilejournal.net

2012-10-31 Thread urodelo
Yes, basically they compare the features and price of gta04 with those of the most common devices (iphoneZ,,, samsung galaxy...). They also complain that some of the hw is obsolete or absent (camera); also that the os shipped (debian) doesn't actually allow to make/get calls. Ok, everybody k

Re: OpenMoko wiki needs to be set to read-only due to spam

2012-10-31 Thread Harald Welte
Hi Paul, I put it on my TODO list and will hopefully be able to do it still today. Thanks for pointing it out. On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:50:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Hi Harald, all, > > To whoever is able to make the OpenMoko wiki read-only, please do so > since no-one is monitoring it fo

OpenMoko wiki needs to be set to read-only due to spam

2012-10-31 Thread Paul Wise
Hi Harald, all, To whoever is able to make the OpenMoko wiki read-only, please do so since no-one is monitoring it for spam and removing that: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed me

Re: QtMoko v48 neofreerunner

2012-10-31 Thread robin
hi, just as it was mentioned in this thread before I can confirm that with the web.de server which stores my mail only certain combinations of the login worked to give me the option to actually send my message (I think it took me about 20mins to figure out which ones...) br robin ___

Re: QtMoko v48 neofreerunner

2012-10-31 Thread David Matthews
As a side note. When i select TLS, i'm not sure it's being saved. If i recall correctly, the qtopiamail config file just said I believe it does get saved - you have to watch out when you edit via the gui, the encryption setting for IMAP does not get loaded from the file, so you have to set