Werner Almesberger wrote:
Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
Today Openmoko released additional pieces of documentation about
Freerunner hardware: board outline, footprints and netlist.
This is great. Thanks a lot to you and everyone in Openmoko who has
helped to make this happen !
Ack -
David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote:
2009/5/18 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:20:13PM +0200, arne anka wrote:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Gta02-core
sounds interesting.
could someone add background information why parts change?
removing
Toni Mueller wrote:
They chose a 100% GPL layout tool, KiCAD
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kicad), which uses only text-based
files
This sounds good, but you seem to require a certain minimum version of
Kicad, right? Checking out from OM and running Lenny's Kicad produced
GNUtoo wrote:
*will the sound quality be ok(is there a plan to correct the problematic
capacitor that is between the sound card and the audio connector)? and
will it fit into the same case than the GTA02...because if I understood
well the sound problem can't or is too difficult to fix
Max wrote:
Are there plans to change uSD placeholder?
No - changing uSD holder isn't part of the GTA02-core plans.
In GTA02-core the intention is that the uSD card contains the full OS
image including kernel. The NAND will only contain QI, and the
expectation is that QI won't need to be
Martin Bernreuther wrote:
One thought is that future phones should include two uSD cards - one
'internal' for OS/kernel etc. and one that is 'removable' for data
storage/exchange - although this is out of scope for GTA02-core.
s/should/could.
Obviously there isn't any commitment to future
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:30:21AM +0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org
wrote:
For now, I'm hoping my Freerunner improves enough to last long, as I don't
expect another Free Software
Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
Thanks Sean for this announcement!
It's appreciated to get a status update from OM of things we've heard
rumors of. I'm very happy that OM got this far with the phones: we
have some tens of thousands (better guess anyone?) of Linux phones
around the world, various
Hi Maddog,
[added cc to gta02-core list]
Thanks for looking into this - it certainly sounds like an amazing
opportunity, almost too good to be true - what's the catch! :-)
Do you know how Dr Zuffo sees the universities involvement with, and
relationship to the rest of the community - i.e. do
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:16:09PM +0100, Michael Sheldon wrote:
Alex Teiche wrote:
Hello everyone,
I recently recieved my A6 FreeRunner, and have been looking for some coding
to do:) I plan on writing a chat application(similar to Pidgin) optomized
Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote:
So organize your needs. Reach out to your own universities and software
usability development groups. Get them to join the project.
Don't give up. If you look closely, you can see the light at the end of
the tunnel. It may be faint, but I have seen similar tunnels
Hi Maddog,
it certainly sounds like an amazing opportunity, almost too good to be true
- what's the catch! :-)
I hope that you will find there is no catch. If you do think there is
a catch, please tell me.
Thanks again for bringing this to us, and the detailed responses. I
Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote:
I assume you would like to modify V1, but could you explain how more
precisely?
I like the over-all look of V1, but I also like the working hardware
box. By putting the working hardware box in a column by itself,
making a three-column layout, you reduce the amount
Patryk Benderz wrote:
[cut]
associated with each table. If that doesn't work, in my mind a simple
1px gray light border would work better than the block colours, which
can be a little over-powering.
1 px added for you where relevant. Tell me how do you like it now.
I Like it
Andrew Stephen wrote:
2009/7/28 Warren Baird wjba...@alumni.uwaterloo.ca:
looks great - I took the liberty of adding the version #'s into the output
created by the template, so you can see the version #'s on the draft
community page.
My preference is '8a'
I vote for 8a also.
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
What I wonder is why nobody did fix u-boot if it had problems with
bigger kernels.
I'm just a bystander here, but from what I understood this wasn't the
reason Qi was started.
u-boot is an entire environment that needs drivers for a lot of the
hardware
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:46:28 + Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org
said:
Being X properties or DBUS, it's the same for me. DBUS seems more natural as
there's probably less pooling, but then I know only a bit more of DBUS than
of X11 (which
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:03:47 + Dave Ball openm...@underhand.org said:
Sounds like we should be using window properties for passing hints to
the WM, and dbus for getting orientation information from the
accelerometers.
that is sane
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
wm needs to track both and determine which one takes precedence based
on policy and th en implement that rotation, if needed. policy is what
a wm implements - that's the nature of the beast. that policy may be
hard-coded in the wm or configuration for
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:37:07 + Dave Ball openm...@underhand.org said:
Is there a quick-start guide for writing an e module, maybe some simple
code / example?
http://www.rasterman.com/files/logo-0.0.1.tar.gz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
wm needs to track both and determine which one takes precedence based
on policy and th en implement that rotation, if needed. policy is what
a wm implements - that's the nature of the beast. that policy may be
hard-coded in the wm or configuration for
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:00:31AM +, Dave Ball wrote:
option1: New atoms in the _NET_WM_STATE property.
- _NET_WM_STATE_LANDSCAPE
- _NET_WM_STATE_PORTRAIT
If neither is present for a given window, WM can choose (based on
the accelerometers). Both present
Warren Baird wrote:
perhaps the landscape / portrait flag should just contrain the
rotation? So if you flip the phone 180 degrees, you get the
'expected' behaviour, but if you just flip it 90 degrees nothing changes?
Given that these properties are for the orientation an application
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:08:06PM +, Dave Ball wrote:
However, what's the use-case for an application requesting either of the
inverted states? I can't see when those would be useful - in terms of
hints the app would supply.
Obviously, if the WM
Warren Baird wrote:
I meant that it should *constrain* the behaviour of rotation - more or
less like omnewrotate behaves now, but skipping over the two
'incorrect' orientations.
so if the app says 'landscape', it's still flip between xrandr -o 1
and xrandr -o 3 as you rotate the phone,
Laszlo KREKACS wrote:
There is also the openpandora project:
http://www.open-pandora.org/index.php?option=com_contentview=categorylayout=blogid=2Itemid=2lang=en
Is it unsuitable for a phone because of power inefficiency?
Can be the ARM Cortex-A8 600Mhz used in a future phone?
The pandora
Hi Werner,
Werner Almesberger wrote:
There are many component choices for future phones. Things to consider
when choosing chips include:
snip
- are they available (to us) ?
What's the yard stick for measuring against here? I.e. are we talking
about one-off from digikey/farnell, samples
Hi Torfinn
with the SD card inserted, I see no bootmenu - it just boots
/dev/mmcblk0p2
every time.
What's wrong?
You forgot to tell Qi not to boot from the SD partitions. See:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qi#Files
According to the readme[1] on the qi-bootmenu
28 matches
Mail list logo
