Shaz wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
> mailto:mic...@openmoko.org>> wrote:
>
> That's the Angstrom branding we inherit by relying on OpenEmbedded
> and its
> flagship distro.
>
>
> This means that due to dependence on openembedded and Angstrom being
> Tiny mail is query based, or pull. That means it eats up more
> batteries than a push based system, also it is not a general purpose
> push framework...
>
>
Not so true, tinymail will use IMAP IDLE if available and that is a push
mechanism.
Graeme
__
Carlo Minucci wrote:
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/OpenVibe
>
> i have make the first release of the OpenVibe: the first opensource
> vibrator :)
>
> enjoy :)
>
>
Brilliant, I haven't laughed so much for ages!
XorA
___
Openmoko community mailing
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 16:43 +0300, Ivan Shirokoff wrote:
> Graeme Gregory пишет:
> > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 16:20 +0300, Ivan Shirokoff wrote:
> >
> >> Hello. Has anyone managed to compile perl for FR?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Yes it successful
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 05:10 -0800, SCarlson wrote:
> "Crystal Ball"? This question is not specific to a distro flavor. FSO or
> OM2008, Openmoko, Qtopia. An ARM port of a ftp client... Just curious if
> someone else has done the work already, if not I want to get one ported.
>
There are numerou
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 16:20 +0300, Ivan Shirokoff wrote:
> Hello. Has anyone managed to compile perl for FR?
>
Yes it successfully compiles in OE, so if you log a feature request bug
and request it get added to official feeds it should become available.
Graeme
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:05 +0100, Franky Van Liedekerke wrote:
> Ok, so I'm feeling totally moronic now ... I'm pretty sure I entered my
> microSD card some 3 months ago, but I can't seem to figure out how to
> remove it again ... some howto for a gta02? I can't seem to find any
> lever or pressur
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 14:18 +0100, jhig wrote:
> hi,
>
> i don't know if this was allready a topic here:
> does kismet run on freerunner?
>
> i installed debian and the kismet package.
> now i have to insert the right source into the kismet.conf file.
>
> i tried
> source=ath5k,eth0,wifi
>
> bu
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 17:15 +0100, Marc Bantle wrote:
> Graeme Gregory schrieb:
> > On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 16:41 +0100, Marc Bantle wrote:
> >
> >> May be someone can setup an oe recipe for unison so it's
> >> available as an opkg file. This might be a b
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 16:41 +0100, Marc Bantle wrote:
> May be someone can setup an oe recipe for unison so it's
> available as an opkg file. This might be a bit of a challenge
> though, because unison is written in ocaml. Also I stumbled
> over [2] which suggests, that somebody already tried.
>
Y
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:12 -0500, Aliner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Graeme Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:58 -0500, Aliner wrote:
> > If we work on having x.org server working on the FR,
> wouldn
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:58 -0500, Aliner wrote:
> If we work on having x.org server working on the FR, wouldn't that
> help for whatever comes next?. At least we would have some working
> knowledge on how to develop drivers for X, and a team of programmers
> with ample knowledge on all things rega
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 07:20 +, Stroller wrote:
> Having said that, I thought one of your engineers was already working
> on Glamo or XGlamo or whatever is required to use the chip's hardware
> acceleration. It would be good for Openmoko to reaffirm its commitment
> to that, to offer goals
Hi, I have been working on updating OE to Xorg 7.4 my work is in a
branch held in the OE git.
http://git.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/shared/xorg-7.4-update
And today with a little help I got it to the point where on gta02 using
fbdev we can run Xorg without any fo
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 16:28 +, Tim Dobson wrote:
> JC Denton wrote:
> > Hi,
> > is there any new info / progress on bug #666 (
> > http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/666 ) that is not yet on the trac/wiki?
> >
> > That bug is now 15 months (!) old and has yet to receive any serious
> > at
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:08 +0200, arne anka wrote:
> > I would like to ask the community:
> >
> > What do you want us to work on?
>
> accelerated x-driver!
> since the specs for the glamo are subject to an nda, nobody else can ...
>
We have an accelerated X driver, do you mean add more features?
Ok, I messed this email up :-)
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:27 +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > Hi I just recieved an interesting mail in the Xorg MailingList this was
> > the contents :
> >
> > >> Why not just go for the full X11? Memory wise I found no difference
>
> Hi I just recieved an interesting mail in the Xorg MailingList this was
> the contents :
>
> >> Why not just go for the full X11? Memory wise I found no difference
> >> in the memory usage between X11 and kdrive on the OMAP.
> >
> >I am told that the full Xorg isn't very happy when built against
Hi, I have just merged OE->OM for this week, this brings in the OE
staging ABI change so I will hold off pushing this patchset until 12:00
GMT on Friday!
People will need to rm -rf tmp/ before a build will work.
Sorry about this, but its an essential change needed to make arm
versions work proper
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:49:29 +0100
Andy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Useful advice, since a kernel package that trashes our device is
> evidently not important enough for anyone to remove it from our
> severs.
>
> Today's ipk is busted the same.
>
> kernel-image-2.6.24_2.6.24+git25+85339279
Well I have seen the future and the future is FSO.
For the first time I have been able to make and receive phone calls on a
gta02 without hassle. GTK+ software could no do this, qtopia software
cannot do this.
And the best of it is, this was on my broken GTA02 where the gsm is
about as reliable a
The machine config file for gta01 and gta02 machines has been renamed
to om-gta01 and om-gta02 to reflect better the manufacturer of the
phones is actually Openmoko.
The will mean people probably need to clean tmp/
Graeme
___
Openmoko community mailing
Hi,
There have been some major changes in the Openmoko monotone repository.
The scheme before became unmaintainable back to org.openembedded.dev so
Openmoko has chosen to branch off the main org.openembedded.dev to a new
branch org.openmoko.dev.
I will state this is not a fork of OE by any means
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:00:46 +0800
Wolfgang Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bzzt, thanks for playing. There is a "Java 1.4 (SE) Technology
> > Preview for ARM" that you can download; this has been available
> > for about 6 months. Unfortunately it doesn't play nice with the
> > particula
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 22:09 -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > This has been a long requested feature and its finally ready to be
> > unleashed on the world.
>
> One less pleasant feature of this ipkg is that a freshly built rootfs
> image wil
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:20:05 +
Graeme Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday Dec 14th at approx 12:00 GMT I will push the change to make
> this happen into OE.
>
A little late due to personal circumstances but this is now committed
to the O
This has been a long requested feature and its finally ready to be
unleashed on the world.
There is unfortunately a bug in the kernel, a workaround for this was
introduced with the November 2007 snapshot. So before I release this
capability I need to make sure everyone has the chance to upgrade th
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:13:44 +0200
ramsesoriginal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome Greg!
> good luck!
>
BTW my name is Graeme, if you call me Greg Ill never know who you are
talking to :-)
Graeme
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists
28 matches
Mail list logo
