On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:44 AM, Dmitri Hrapof wrote:
Jamie Allsop пишет:
Yes this page is very good. One thing you might want to note also
is that there is a nice C++ binding for Python in boost
www.boost.org. Please don't infer from this that I am a big
Python fan, most of my scripting to
On Apr 18, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
PyGTK looks like the most likely contender to me -- not just because I
wrote a book about it and I'm the author of almost everything
Python-related in OE, but also because PyGTK is pretty mature and
easy to extend (you probably have
Duncan Hudson wrote:
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
Finally, we've already begun moving production into one of our factories
in mainland China. There are two runs scheduled now: May 10th and May
20th. We're going to take those runs a bit slow just to make sure the
quality is high. And then starting in
Steven ** wrote:
On 4/29/07, Martin Lefkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an HTC wizard right now branded as cingular that I am running
skype on. If I remember correctly I downloaded the software off the
skype site for this handset. Does this mean it's approved or not
approved?
With
Vladimír Lapáček wrote:
Hi,
I am quite currious about the GPS module planned in Neo 1973. For me
it is one of the really nice things about Neo. I don't have much
experience with GPS, but this really makes me thinking about buying
the device.
My question is if in Neo will have sense of
Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand correctly, JavaFX Script
Sander van Grieken wrote:
Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand
I know its bad form to respond to one's own posting, but watch the end
of the 'webcast' around the 15:00 mark, just after McNealy gets up to
talk about Curriki, and then compares Rich Green to Jobs, where Jonathan
Schwartz turns to ask Rich Green:
JS: Rich, how would you feel about someone
Terrence Barr - Evangelist, Java Mobile Embedded wrote:
Shawn,
I have been very involved in this area at Sun now for a couple of
years. Let me add come comments:
Hardware accelerated Java is actually fairly common already, at
least in the Java ME space using ARM's Jazelle technology. It does
(or for) the iPhone
(as well as other phones)... success!. If Sun's JavaFX Mobile,
well... success!
Jim
Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On 5/10/07, Jim Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terrence Barr - Evangelist, Java Mobile Embedded wrote:
Shawn,
I have been very involved in this area at Sun now
Duncan Hudson wrote:
Just read that the iPhone was granted FCC approval. I asked along time
ago, has the OpenMoko FCC certification process even begun yet? No FCC
approval, no license to sell the product in the US...
Its not a license. You can't sell, or offer to sell a device subject
to
Jason Elwell wrote:
Jim,
Question: Do the regulations govern devices that are offered for sale in the
US, but not devices that are sold by an off-shore company to people in the
US?
I was under the impression that any electronic device sold for use in the USA
has to be cleared by the FCC.
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
For purposes of the regulations, what exactly is a device? If the
actual tranceiver is approved (and I assume it is), does that carry
approval for a phone using it?
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/rules/
___
OpenMoko community
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 21.05.2007 um 04:57 schrieb Joe Friedrichsen:
It would be great to know if any of the P0 folks are US-based as well.
The majority sound European, save Rod :-)
Well, the EU has similar rules but there is no central FCC. It is
called CE and the entity (you
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 14:54 -0400, Duncan Hudson wrote:
That’s about as far as I bothered reading – I’ll wait until there
is
an official FIC response in the next 24-48 hours about how they
intend to supply orders in the USA before I bother reading any
more.
The NEO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've not seen any of these devices except in the photos, and I've not seen
any video/screen capture of the software in its current state. I
understand
that this is a first-generation device, and that when the Neo1973 is
released that FIC will also be releasing a few
el jefe delito wrote:
I hope that we can start to create some buzz about this product! Being
open, being able to work with multiple service providers, being
unlocked, being cheaper, being higher-resolution... all of these are
benefits that we must PROMOTE. The quicker we can post on an
Attila Csipa wrote:
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 16:26, Matthew S. Hamrick wrote:
Gibson Musical Instruments, where we were designing what was
effectively a custom PDA (don't ask.)
guitar tuner?
There were several delays,
And wait, and wait. And it never shows up. Then you get back on the
18 matches
Mail list logo
