Proposal: Personal Data Encryption (maybe SoC?)

2007-03-17 Thread Tobias Gruetzmacher
Hi, I have followed the discussions about elaborate schemes for theft protection on this list, but I think most of them shoot in the wrong direction. Sure, it is desirable to get your phone back, but in reality that is normally not the case. So while we aren't really able to protect the phone

Re: Proposal: Personal Data Encryption (maybe SoC?)

2007-03-18 Thread Tobias Gruetzmacher
Hi, Am Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:24:31 +0100 schrieb Henryk Plötz: What I'm proposing is a user-friendly encryption scheme of the data the user stores in his phone, so any illegitimate user will not be able to get personal data about the owner of the phone. I was thinking about something similar

Re: Proposal: Personal Data Encryption (maybe SoC?)

2007-03-18 Thread Tobias Gruetzmacher
Hi, Am Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:57:21 +0100 schrieb Paul Wouters: I vote no on this one, primarily due to not being able to access this information without nearby people hearing (Or possibly recording) the pass phrase (Think about trains, planes, buses, business meetings, etc). A user-defined

Re: Proposal: Personal Data Encryption (maybe SoC?)

2007-03-19 Thread Tobias Gruetzmacher
Hi, Am Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:28:28 +0100 schrieb Sven Neuhaus: With regards to encryption - it'd be great if microSD cards can contain dm-crypt'ed partitions. It's probably rather trivial to add this. Partitions are a major usability nightmare IMHO. That is the reason my proposal focused on

Re: Proposal: Personal Data Encryption (maybe SoC?)

2007-03-21 Thread Tobias Gruetzmacher
Hi, Am Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:31:56 +0100 schrieb Sven Neuhaus: Tobias Gruetzmacher wrote: Partitions are a major usability nightmare IMHO. That is the reason my proposal focused on encfs/ecryptfs, which both are layered encryption file systems. This removes the requirement to set a fixed size