Re: TSM30 source found!

2011-09-29 Thread Corey
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 06:57:09 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > If the person who has given me the "secret" URL emails me and tells me > that s/he does not object to that URL being posted on the list, I will > promptly do so. But I won't be able to do that otherwise, as the risk > of compromi

Re: TSM30 source found!

2011-09-29 Thread corey
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 01:45:17 PM Patryk Benderz wrote: > Apart of legal aspects, why don't you just make it a torrent and let all > who want to host it? This is very efficient way to spread big files over > the net. > I'm similarly confused as to why he doesn't just send an email to the

Re: Aurora

2011-05-17 Thread Corey
Thankyou for the clarification! On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 08:47:46 AM Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: > Hi Corey, > > > On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:02:58 AM Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > >> NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that

Re: Aurora

2011-05-16 Thread Corey
On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:02:58 AM Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if > you want to reply. > > Aurora is supposed to be something we call a "featurephone client" – > featurephones being those things we used for telephony before

Re: qtmoko on nand - qi or u-boot?

2010-05-24 Thread Corey
On Monday 24 May 2010 1:10:21 Paul Fertser wrote: > Corey writes: > > So, is it not possible to install qtmoko to nand using qi instead of > > u-boot? > > Qi doesn't allow to "install" (read "flash to NAND) anything because > it doesn't support

qtmoko on nand - qi or u-boot?

2010-05-24 Thread Corey
Hello! The Qi page on the wiki (http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qi) says: "actively developed (u-boot on GTA02 is deprecated)" But the qtmoko installation page (http://qtmoko.org/wiki/Installation) says: "Method 1: Installing on NAND [...] If you flash it you also need U-boot which is flashed w

Re: will GTA03 be ready for holiday season?

2008-08-28 Thread Corey Young
Hmmm. I seem to remember someone saying something like that But that might just be me. Can we get someone official to answer this? even if its just to state that it wont be ready by then. > > > > It seems that the first 25 GTA03 Evaluation Boards have already > > arrived to wolfgang on Augus

The GTAs

2008-07-24 Thread Corey Young
Ok. Now that the FreeRunner is out, I'd like to discuss the GTA03 and 04. I've been listening to this list for quite some time, and have jotted down a few things about the upcoming models. Please make sure I have all of this correct. And if its correct, is it all on the Wiki? I can't find ment

Re: anyone using FR as a phone?

2008-07-21 Thread Corey Young
issue. > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > wow... wish my Dad had your job... that way I'd get to play with cool > > phones! haha j/k. I love my dad. ^_^ > > > > Corey > > > > I will tell you story. My father was a printer and Sa

Anyone using FR as a phone?

2008-07-14 Thread Corey Young
> > From: steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I use mine. My kids used theirs till I gave it away to somebody else. > > > > That said, some people have expereince audio issues. Engineering is on the > > issue. > > > > Steve wow... wish my Dad had your job... that way I'd get to play with cool phone

Re: a few questions about the games

2008-05-12 Thread Corey Young
ooh! how about a game that uses the same type interface from Kirby tilt 'n tumble? where you hod it flat to stay still and tilt in the direction you want to go? On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 21:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send community mailing list submissions to > community@lists.open

Re: about those new lists . . .

2007-01-28 Thread Corey
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/openmoko-devel On Saturday 27 January 2007 14:04, Pius A. Uzamere II wrote: > So, Sean, can you create some sublists now? (e.g. openmoko-dev, > openmoko-freedom) People have floated the idea quite a bit, but this isn't > a float . . . this is a direct

openmoko-devel ( was Re: Please keep discussion on topic )

2007-01-27 Thread Corey
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/openmoko-devel On Saturday 27 January 2007 10:04, Jonathon Suggs wrote: > Can we PLEASE keep the posts to the entire list ON TOPIC!!! > > The last few digest have all been about licensing, personal agendas, and > discussion NOT related to OpenMoko. A

Re: GNU discussion

2007-01-27 Thread Corey
are-license] is best which governs not at all"; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of license which they will have. ... BSDL "governs" not at all, which the anarchist in me very much appreciates. To digress furth

request for openmoko-devel list

2007-01-24 Thread Corey
I'm more than certain that the OpenMoko crew is extremely busy with many important efforts right now, but it should be a very simple task to open a new mailing list. Doing so - sooner than later - would be hugely beneficial in the immediate sense, as it would diversify the list traffic so that the

Re: Free Your Phone

2007-01-23 Thread Corey
of the OpenMoko platform itself, and through the community that's bound to prosper around it. Beers! Corey ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: GNU discussion (was re:Free your phone)

2007-01-22 Thread Corey
On Monday 22 January 2007 20:07, David Ford wrote: > p.s. the more people blabber about GNU, the more I try to remove it from > my system and support non-GNU replacements. > That's obviously your prerogative, by all means. But... wow, talk about throwing out the baby with the bath water. I'm c

Re: built-in scripting languages

2007-01-22 Thread Corey
On Monday 22 January 2007 16:07, Ben Burdette wrote: > > The only potential downfall may be that everyone ends up with quite a > > few interpreters on their poor little phones... python, ruby, rhino, > > lua, perl, etc, etc.. > > That's all well and good when everyone has SPACE for every scripting

Re: built-in scripting languages

2007-01-22 Thread Corey
On Monday 22 January 2007 15:33, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote: > Let me rephrase then. Have it defined as a standard-optional component that > can be used. But isn't installed by default. Won't ipkg have dependency > resolution etc? > Yes, so the dependency aspect will likely be a non-issue; hope

Re: built-in scripting languages

2007-01-22 Thread Corey
On Monday 22 January 2007 14:49, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote: > Why is this even being discused... you have the ability to add anything to > the phone once you get your hands on it... SO any scripting languages one > desires can be added. > It's true that you have the ability to add anything to

Re: built-in scripting languages

2007-01-22 Thread Corey
On Monday 22 January 2007 14:03, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia poniedziałek, 22 stycznia 2007 21:45, Corey napisał: > > > I would recommend lua, it's extremely light-weight ( we're talking > > about 6 megs here ) > > 6M??? > > http://openzaurus.lin

Re: built-in scripting languages

2007-01-22 Thread Corey
On Monday 22 January 2007 13:28, Andreas Kostyrka wrote: > * Derek Pressnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070122 19:40]: > > Seeing as how there has been interest in including an interpreted > > language with the default software install (such as Python or Perl, > > etc.), and the fact that they are too bi

Re: Signal-to-noise ratio

2007-01-21 Thread Corey
Troll alert. On Sunday 21 January 2007 20:43, Greg Tada wrote: > I'd like to help out this project, I really would. But when zealots > like Renaissance Man (Who calls themselves that? Yeah that's not > pretentious at all) et al hijack this list for their own religious > soapboxing, I don't have t

Re: Free Your Phone

2007-01-21 Thread Corey
On Sunday 21 January 2007 18:28, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote: > On 1/22/07 4:46 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Michael, wishing for "Free Your Phone" T-shirts and stickers > > Coming soon... ;-) > Hell yeah! I would definitely pay money to be a walking billboard for FIC - a worthy ca

Re: Wiki + Mailing List

2007-01-21 Thread Corey
On Sunday 21 January 2007 14:20, Ted Lemon wrote: > I think that if the discussion here can be tolerated, it's > better because it's cross-pollinating. > Generally speaking, what helps on mailing lists is actually two- > fold. > First, we need to exercise restraint. > part of what perpe

[OT] aims ( was Re: Free Your Phone )

2007-01-21 Thread Corey
On Sunday 21 January 2007 13:58, Milan Votava wrote: > It would be nice to know if Sean's aim is > > 1. to satisfy his and our need for open source toys like Neo > > or > > 2. to earn money like almost everybody on this planet while > exploiting geeks like us to achieve his goal :-) > > > I b

[OT] gnu debate ( was Re: Free Your Phone )

2007-01-21 Thread Corey
On Sunday 21 January 2007 13:40, Dave Crossland wrote: > On 20/01/07, Richard Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > and thus it feels more like agenda-pushing. > > The whole Free Software concept __is__ an agenda, That is a crucial point. One cannot expect such an extremely fundamental aspect o

Re: Linux vs. GNU/Linux

2007-01-21 Thread Corey
On Sunday 21 January 2007 09:05, Ole Tange wrote: > If people ask you why you chose the one then answer them politely by > personal email. > Another solution is to ignore the thread. Most/all mail clients have this ability, for good reason.[1] In the mean time, those who still desire to partici

Re: Free Your Phone

2007-01-20 Thread Corey
On Saturday 20 January 2007 15:48, David Ford wrote: > OpenMoko FIC/GNU/Linus/Alan Cox/X11/Xorg/GTK/... Linux. Oh, and who is > the principal for the plastic and silicon? How about the makers of the > editors you use to create all this code and give credit to the companies > that supplied the

Re: Free Your Phone

2007-01-20 Thread Corey
On Saturday 20 January 2007 16:13, Richard Franks wrote: > PS. Are there people who actually say GNU/Linux in conversation and/or > correct themselves if they forget the GNU part? > I'm sure different people have varying degrees of concern over this; however, ask yourself this: if you were to men

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-18 Thread Corey
On Thursday 18 January 2007 12:23, Renaissance Man wrote: > You still don't get it. The "revolutionary aspect" of such a device > would be the ability to talk to anyone mostly for free with one > device and phone number, and be mobile. WiFi/VoIP is just a necessary > part of the package for a

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Corey
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 17:40, Renaissance Man wrote: > It doesn't have the one thing it needs to be a revolution. > The revolution will break out when FIC releases the second version of the OpenMoko hardware, which I wouldn't be all too surprised if it happens before the end of the year. Un

Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Corey
On Monday 27 November 2006 16:14, Robert Michel wrote: > - no bottle opener > What!? unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Corey
On Monday 27 November 2006 14:11, Koen Kooi wrote: > Steve Salazar schreef: > > - Storage: 1GB minimum integrated SD for running a real linux. > > Kernel 2.6.17.7 isn't real enough for you? ;) > Heheh - when will it become clear that: "linux" == kernel && kernel != userland Still, you knew

Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Corey
On Monday 27 November 2006 13:34, Steve Salazar wrote: > 3. Why did you not use opie or gpe? > I don't know anything about gpe, but opie uses QT, and QT is GPL - so anything written that uses the QT libraries must therefore also be GPL. GTK is LGPL, so you can use the gtk libraries in your applic

Re: My few cents*...

2006-11-13 Thread Corey
On Monday 13 November 2006 11:04, Chad wrote: > I think Bluetooth would/will be a very important feature Is there actually the possibility that the Neo1973 might ship in January _without_ bluetooth? That would be _extremely_ unfortunate. Lacking both bluetooth _and_ wifi, would basically make