Re: $100 computers (was: Microtouch)

2012-02-08 Thread Reid Thompson
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 15:51 -0500, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
 Shawn Rutledge shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com writes:
 
  With an Atmel it sounds like a dancing bear to me; it has so little
  memory that you basically have to use it only for fixed purposes, like
  the games they show.  No dynamic languages or possibility of
  downloading much content.
 
 $100 would also get you Qi Hardware's Nanonote units, which is
 comparable to a Raspberry Pi + monitor + keyboard that you can
 actually carry in your pocket and use on the go (comes with
 a Li-ion battery, runs for ~9 hours in my experience).
 
 I have one. I like it. I use it mainly as a smart music-player;
 I've also written and run some Python and Scheme programs on it
 (so, it makes a nice `programmer's calculator' for, e.g.: solving
  recursive problems).
 
 Not sure what others do with theirs.
 
 A couple of friends also have them, and it seems to take about
 3 days between ordering from Sharism in Hong Kong and having them
 arrive on our doorsteps in the US.
 
MikroElektronika has variants of this for AVR, ARM and *PIC*  $99
http://www.mikroe.com/eng/products/view/688/mikromedia-for-xmega/
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: at command

2009-07-07 Thread Reid Thompson
Test wrote:
  
 I am playing w/ some AT commands. If you know what are these AT commands 
 for? let me know, and also how to use them?
  
 at+frq
 at+clvl
 at+fpw
  
 thanks
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

google at modem command set

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Subject prefix for e-mails

2007-12-31 Thread Reid Thompson

Colan Schwartz wrote:

Hi list,

On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:39:48PM +0100, Galevsky wrote:

I agree, all the info are already provided, and you have to setup your
MUA to fit your needs. (sort your mails by sender, List-Id,
...whatever you want)


Thanks for bringing this to my attention.  I had no idea that MUAs cared
about the List-Id header.  I just found a way to set this up in Mutt,
http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/EmailClientForMailingListFiltering#mutt.
-c.



These ( or variants of it ) may be of use too
color index red black .*lists.openmoko.org.*
color index red black ~h lists.openmoko.org

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Sorry... Re: And please use a emailclients with working Reference Re: gmail users CC'ing

2007-02-13 Thread Reid Thompson
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:00 -0500, hank williams wrote:
 On 2/13/07, Reid Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:02 -0500, hank williams wrote:
   hmm... guess those Google guys aren't smart enough to handle mail the
   better way. With your way, even if you change the subject it would be
   part of the same thread.
  I believe that is proper -- to remain part of the same thread.  To
  create a new thread, start with a new email -- do not reply to a current
  thread with an altered subject.
 
 
 Well, it depends on how you define proper. Again, to me this is
 about user interface, and what is expected behavior. I dont think your
 average (non-programmer) would think that a
  new message with a

a new message no, which is what I said to do if you want to create a new
thread -- but the conversation was about replying to a previous message
and changing the subject expecting it to start a new thread -- which
does not work.

 different subject would be in the same thread.

My gmail account does this, so anyone using gmail should expect it after
seeing it occur -- see below.
Replies to emails with changed subject show in the same
thread/conversation, not new or separate ones.

  More importantly, the
 interface revolution in gmail is the grouping of threads by subject.
Not based on what I just did ( subject threading may be a fallback
mechanism as mentioned earlier -- evolution has this 'option' also).

 This is one of the reasons that so many people love gmail. It makes
 what used to be a much more complicated thing much easier to follow. I
 think people are voting with their email accounts and by this measure
 people in mailing lists *love* the gmail design. The high percentage
 of gmail use vs aol or hotmail or outlook or whatever is no
 coincidence.
 
 Regards,
 Hank

In my gmail account: 
create a message with subject Test Thread - body Test Thread.  Send
it.  Reply to it from gmail account, Change the subject to Test Thread
Two - body to test thread Two, Send it.  Reply to Test Thread Two,
Change subject to Test Thread three - body to Test Thread 3, Send
it.  View Test Thread Three,,, see that Google 'threaded' all three
messages as one thread/conversation, not three separate ones.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community