Re: Web Shop Site Problem

Joe Pfeiffer wrote: I don't know if you somebody else's response to my query about this, yesterday: at least in the US, the state/province field of the form has to be the two-capital-letter abbreviation (so I got the blank page when I entered New Mexico, but was able to place my order when I ent

Web Shop Site Problem

Hi, I've been having problems with the shopping site since it went online. From https://direct.openmoko.com/, I would order the device and would be redirected to a blank page https://direct.openmoko.com/cgi-bin/order.cgi . I've tried it on Firefox on linux, then on Windows and finally *shudde

Re: openmoko-devel ( was Re: Please keep discussion on topic )

On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 00:51 -0700, Corey wrote: > https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/openmoko-devel Great! I've subscribed to that list and will unsubscribe to this in due course. I swear if I read the words GNU/Linux and freedom mentioned there Whatever good bits come off of this l

Communications (was Re: Developers phone also fit for early adopters?)

On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 13:40 -0500, Steven Milburn wrote: > Sean: I think you missed the sarcastic hyperbole that Marcus was > attempting to use. He was basically saying that calling you liars > would be about as wrong as assuming since he didn't reply, he must not > have read a post. It's a weak

Re: Will the OSDL/MLI have a yearly report as well? Re: LiMo foundation

On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 01:51 +0800, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote: > >> Linux Organisation membership and organisation politics is not my > >> business, but from the linux-user point of view it is a little > >> confusing that OpenMoko/Neo1973 isn't mentioned here: > >> http://old.linux-foundation.org/lab_ac

Re: idea for Neo 2nd generation: Accelerometer

On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 09:41 -0800, Tim Newsom wrote: > Ok Steve. I grant you that the first derivative of acceleration is > velocity... How do you propose to gain any velocity information when the > acceleration measured is zero as would be the case if you are at a > constant velocity? This is

Re: Possibilities for commercial software?

On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 10:58 -0600, Jonathon Suggs wrote:Dave Crossland wrote: > But when I copy software, no one loses it and another person gets it. > There's no ethical problem. > > Sorry Dave, but you are wrong. There IS an ethical problem. Just > because you CAN do something doesn't mean tha

Re: Reactions From Other People to News of OpenMoko

This should be put on the Wiki under Advocacy (or similar): On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 09:16 +, Andrew Loughran wrote: > If anyone needs examples of how phones connect behind ones back, I can > provide a fair few. > > I had the O2 XDA Orbit. It looks like a smashing phone, but the software on >

Re: Required Software

On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 09:00 -0500, Duncan Hudson wrote: > I'm sure that this has been discussed, but there will be a VPN client > pre-installed right? I know it's open source and I'm free to put what I > want but don't you think there should be a pre-installed client that is > certified to work

Re: Neo Carputer (was: idea for Neo 2nd generation: Accelerometer)

On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 11:06 -0500, Andrew Turner wrote: > On 1/26/07, Tim Newsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As a side note... In the US and probably other countries there is a > > standard for the interface to the car computer. From that interface you > > can get the vehicle speed and diagnost

Re: LiMo foundation

On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 10:22 -0500, Gervais Mulongoy wrote: > Applications get written over and over again because people are not > satisfied with the way things are. Well, it's not actually that simple. There are actually quite a few reasons. NIH being one of the most irritating. But even if it wa

Re: WiFi

On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 08:38 +0100, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > Not sure just how 802.11n is useful on a *phone*. Just about everything the > CPU can reasonably be expected to handle runs just fine on 11G True that. I can't think of an application right now for 11n on a phone. But then again, someone

Re: emulator something like greenphone vmware?

On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 09:40 +0200, Denis Kot wrote: > No, I don't need hardware emulator. I need "interface emulator" :). > Where I can play with phone's interface and maybe onboard software w/o > buying the phone. It's ok if it will be compiled for i386 or whatever. lol .. the xoo is perfect. I

Re: dialer interface questions

On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 23:52 -0700, Jeff Andros wrote: > I hope you can give us a hand with this stuff without getting yourself > in trouble. I'm actually more concerned that I might harm the project by my involvement so I'll stay away from IMEs for a while. I'll have to find an IP lawyer who can

Re: dialer interface questions

I don't mean to toot my own horn (up till June of 2006, I worked for Zi Corporation as a developer), but you should really check out Qix . Unfortunately, most of that stuff is likely patented. I'm not even sure how I can go about developing for OpenMoko since I worked

Re: LiMo foundation

On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 16:02 -0500, Anthony Taylor wrote: > Well, now. This is interesting: > > http://www.limofoundation.org/sf/sfmain/do/home I would like to know whether OpenMoko intends to meander its way towards following one of the eventual standards. Personally, I'd like to see a common pla

Re: emulator something like greenphone vmware?

On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 19:08 -0700, Richi Plana wrote: > If I understand the original poster correctly, he's looking for a > hardware emulator. Personally, I would like to see an emulator for the > Samsung s3c2410 as well. What instruction set does it use? Its own? ARM? > Is there

Re: WiFi

On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 15:11 +, Tom Berger wrote: > I'm new to the list, so I don't know whether this was already > discussed, but I'm surprised (and a bit sorry) that the OpenMoKo spec > doesn't include WiFi I guess it's just as well that the first version didn't contain WiFi as the specs for

Re: emulator something like greenphone vmware?

On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 21:14 +0100, Rodolphe Ortalo wrote: > Le jeudi 25 janvier 2007 à 10:20 +0200, Denis Kot a écrit : > > Hi all > > I did searching by lists but didn't find anything about emulator, so > > my question is: > > is there will be something like emulator like greenphone has? so I > >

Re: Free Your Phone

develop for the Neo ... not by selling the app nor the phone, but by providing it as part of a solution to business and personal problems which my company caters to. Practically everything I develop will be released as open source, unless my client pays me not to. -- Richi Plana

Wiki + Mailing List

ll all the useful and relevant information as they come in. I'm not advocating the use of MediaWiki. I'm just tossing the idea of channeling all this creative resource into a more directed path. (Although MediaWiki does seem like a step in the right direction.) -- Richi Plana _

Re: Text input, OpenMoko and Tengo

wrote: > > >> Would I be right in assuming we won't see anything like Tengo-type > > >> free software text input on OpenMoko, being that it's patented? > > >> > > >> http://www.tengo.net/ > > >> > > >> I'm also as

Re: exchange email?

n, is written in Java and is based on the Open Mobile Alliance Data Synchronization and Device Management protocols. -- Richi Plana ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community