On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 15:27:13 +0100
Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
Now for someone to find the time to try this ;-)
I applied the latest BFS patch to the andy-tracking branch of the
kernel but it wouldn't build - probably an indication of my noob
kernel skills rather than the
Great, thanks Tom, I'll have a look at that later. Does it seem to
make any difference for you?
Cheers, Joseph
2009/9/9 Thomas White t...@bitwiz.org.uk:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 15:27:13 +0100
Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
Now for someone to find the time to try this ;-)
I
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:43:49 +0100
Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
Great, thanks Tom, I'll have a look at that later. Does it seem to
make any difference for you?
It's difficult to say, really. I haven't done any scientific tests,
but it feels a little faster in some areas
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:43:49 +0100
Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
Great, thanks Tom, I'll have a look at that later. Does it seem to
make any difference for you?
It's difficult to say, really. I haven't done any scientific tests,
but it feels a little faster in some areas
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Joseph Reeves wrote:
Now for someone to find the time to try this ;-)
I applied the latest BFS patch to the andy-tracking branch of the
kernel but it wouldn't build - probably an indication of my noob
kernel skills rather than the applicability of the
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:50:43AM +0300, Markus T�rnqvist wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Joseph Reeves wrote:
Now for someone to find the time to try this ;-)
I applied the latest BFS patch to the andy-tracking branch of the
kernel but it wouldn't build - probably an
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabrar...@ansol.org wrote:
http://twitter.com/cyanogen/status/3836404163
One last thing.. you know the lag you get when your phone rings and it
doesn't display right away? Yeah thats gone now.
On a wl500 router the performance hit is 1.5 time
SHR + 2.6.31 + BFS + OpenWRT drivers = win?
2009/9/8 Laszlo KREKACS laszlo.krekacs.l...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabrar...@ansol.org
wrote:
http://twitter.com/cyanogen/status/3836404163
One last thing.. you know the lag you get when your phone rings and
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:04:56AM +0100, Joseph Reeves wrote:
SHR + 2.6.31 + BFS + OpenWRT drivers = win?
Would appear that way if someone had the time and environment;
I really loved the Android stuff on Twitter :)
--
mjt
___
Openmoko community
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Joseph Reevesiknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
SHR + 2.6.31 + BFS + OpenWRT drivers = win?
+KMS
Laszlo
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
What's up with the drivers from OpenWRT? Are they different? Why aren't they
merged?
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:04:56AM +0100, Joseph Reeves wrote:
SHR + 2.6.31 + BFS + OpenWRT drivers = win?
2009/9/8 Laszlo KREKACS laszlo.krekacs.l...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Rui Miguel
What's up with the drivers from OpenWRT? Are they different? Why aren't they
merged?
I've only really read on here about them, but I'm told that some are
complete rewrites that provide potentially big improvements. Don't
know about their status in other distributions, however.
Forgot to add +
-
just to see if it makes any difference at all.
Now for someone to find the time to try this ;-)
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Interesting-Linux-development-for-lower-resources-machines-from-Con-Kolivas-tp3566462p3567588.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing
http://lwn.net/Articles/350100/
Con Kolivas, who worked on desktop interactivity issues in the past before
storming off in 2007, has posted a new scheduler called BFS. It was
designed to be forward looking only, make the most of lower spec machines,
and not scale to massive hardware. ie it is a
http://lwn.net/Articles/350100/
Con Kolivas, who worked on desktop interactivity issues in the past before
storming off in 2007, has posted a new scheduler called BFS. It was
designed to be forward looking only, make the most of lower spec machines,
and not scale to massive hardware. ie it is a
http://lwn.net/Articles/350100/
Con Kolivas, who worked on desktop interactivity issues in the past before
storming off in 2007, has posted a new scheduler called BFS. It was
designed to be forward looking only, make the most of lower spec machines,
and not scale to massive hardware. ie it
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:01:46PM +, Niels Heyvaert wrote:
http://lwn.net/Articles/350100/
Reading the FAQ text and reactions on LWN it appears to me that the author
has no intention whatsoever to merge this into the mainline kernel tree...
But aren't there vendor kernels for the moko
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:01:46PM +, Niels Heyvaert wrote:
Reading the FAQ text and reactions on LWN it appears to me that the author
has no intention whatsoever to merge this into the mainline kernel tree...
BEcause his precedent work was not merged for years?
I would not expect to be
Reading the FAQ text and reactions on LWN it appears to me that the author
has no intention whatsoever to merge this into the mainline kernel tree...
BEcause his precedent work was not merged for years?
I would not expect to be merged either ...
I dont think he would opposed the merge.
to find the time to try this ;-)
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Interesting-Linux-development-for-lower-resources-machines-from-Con-Kolivas-tp3566462p3567588.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Niels Heyvaertnielsheyva...@hotmail.com wrote:
Because it's designed in such a way that mainline would never be interested
in adopting it, which is how I like it.
I think in Solaris the sheduler are pluggable. Ie, it can be swapped.
In linux its hardwired, and
21 matches
Mail list logo
