Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-08-01 Thread Paul Fertser
Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org writes: This said, oFono does have one very compelling feature: on my N900, it works reliably. Far better than any version of FSO that I ever managed to put on my FreeRunner ever did. If you think that Nokia's N900 firmware is using oFono, you're wrong. Or do

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-31 Thread Neil Jerram
Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org writes: What I think is needed now are components that give existing distributions capabilities they didn't have before. Then to see what people develop on top of them. +1 But to be appealing to developers who are new to the system (which basically means,

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-31 Thread Dr. Michael Lauer
Hi, Arguably those two paragraphs are already well satisfied by oFono. oFono probably now has the advantage in terms of maturity and deployment, is compilable by a standard C compiler, and has a recent version packaged in Debian. FSO is compilable with a standard C compiler as well. Every

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-24 Thread Simon Busch
Am 24.07.2012 11:27, schrieb Thomas Munker: Hi, i thought the ui is saving the volume values where it should (using opreference interface), but fso doesn't pick them up. There's an old bugreport in shr-track [0], that suggests it's fso's fault. Maybe this should be clarified. I've found a new

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-24 Thread Thamos
Thanks a lot, you'r the greatest :) Am 24.07.2012 18:17, schrieb Simon Busch: Am 24.07.2012 11:27, schrieb Thomas Munker: Hi, i thought the ui is saving the volume values where it should (using opreference interface), but fso doesn't pick them up. There's an old bugreport in shr-track [0],

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-22 Thread Simon Busch
Am 21.07.2012 21:44, schrieb Thamos: Hi all. I've never seen someone using the conference-feature. I think selecting the provider is more important. (this one really annoys me, since i am near an border and simply can't phone until i get out auf alien range, if the phone switched one time, even

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-22 Thread Simon Busch
Am 22.07.2012 02:24, schrieb Kai Lüke: Hello, I think these all together will be fine. The only thing I have in my mind beside these is something I ever wanted to try but never did: redirecting sound (e.g. a sound file with pause melody or answerphone) to the call input. It depends a lot on

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-22 Thread Simon Busch
Am 22.07.2012 03:39, schrieb Pierre Pronchery: Hi Simon, lists, On 21/07/2012 20:45, Simon Busch wrote: as a lot of you may have noticed we did two releases in the past months of the FSO stack. Both were related to bring stability and consistence to the stack. Now I want to

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-21 Thread Thamos
Hi all. I've never seen someone using the conference-feature. I think selecting the provider is more important. (this one really annoys me, since i am near an border and simply can't phone until i get out auf alien range, if the phone switched one time, even reboot doesn't help...). I also miss

Re: About the future of the freesmartphone.org middleware

2012-07-21 Thread Kai Lüke
Hello, I think these all together will be fine. The only thing I have in my mind beside these is something I ever wanted to try but never did: redirecting sound (e.g. a sound file with pause melody or answerphone) to the call input. But just an idea, thanks! Kai Am 21.07.2012 21:44, schrieb