Ian Stirling wrote:
Steve Seltzer wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
Using a copy of mplayer originally intended for the Zaurus, mentioned
by anrp on IRC.
I played back a random video - which happened to be
VIDEO: MPEG1 352x240 (aspect 1) 24.000 fps 1536.0 kbps (192.0
Ian Stirling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Using a copy of mplayer originally intended for the Zaurus, mentioned by
anrp on IRC.
I played back a random video - which happened to be
VIDEO: MPEG1 352x240 (aspect 1) 24.000 fps 1536.0 kbps
(192.0 kbyte/s)
It 'just worked'.
I'm sure
Giles Jones wrote:
Ian Stirling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Using a copy of mplayer originally intended for the Zaurus, mentioned by
anrp on IRC.
I played back a random video - which happened to be
VIDEO: MPEG1 352x240 (aspect 1) 24.000 fps 1536.0 kbps
(192.0 kbyte/s)
It 'just
Steve Seltzer wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
Using a copy of mplayer originally intended for the Zaurus, mentioned
by anrp on IRC.
I played back a random video - which happened to be
VIDEO: MPEG1 352x240 (aspect 1) 24.000 fps 1536.0 kbps (192.0
kbyte/s)
It 'just
Ian Stirling wrote:
192Kbytes/sec - not really close.
192KB/s = 1536Kb/s
B - Bytes
b - bits
Different units, same bandwidth.
Shachar
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
192Kbytes/sec - not really close.
192KB/s = 1536Kb/s
B - Bytes
b - bits
Different units, same bandwidth.
Indeed.
However, why do you think that the speed of the SD is close to 200KB/s,
because it isn't.
6 matches
Mail list logo