On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:58:45PM +0200, pike wrote:
Bear with me :-) The bitbake recipe refers to the ipk ?
bitbake recipe is build description which instructs bitbake how to
create correct .ipk or .dep or .rpm or whatever from source archive.
In thone case it's repackaging your scripts.
Thanks for being clear here. I thought long
and deep about this, and, read a manual :-)
Probably the bitbake recipe is more complicated
than the ipk it creates, but I guess that doesnt
matter on your side - you need the recipe, not
So can I push the recipe for 0.6 as is and then improve it with next
version? I would like to.. as I'm leaving tomorrow for few days..
And it's pretty simple
but those 'cp' aren't good practise as you cannot easily adjust ie file
permissions as install call does..
For now, I'll try hosting the ipkg myself;
based on the one you created.
A question: why is that file different than
the ipkg described by QTopia
or even here
In these descriptions, the control directory is
a directory, not a file.
I never used ipkg-build manually, I guess that CONTROL is only temporary
file and CONTROL/control is what is packed in .ipk as control, so the
same.. but as I said before, I never used it manualy and I'm not .ipk
format expert :).
Jansa Martin sip:jama...@voip.wengo.fr
Openmoko community mailing list