Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
(Private note: I have this strange sense of Deja Vu :-), although it's been a
long time since we had this argument :-)
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 02:56:12 Lorn Potter wrote:
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or
Lorn Potter wrote:
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
(Private note: I have this strange sense of Deja Vu :-), although it's been
a
long time since we had this argument :-)
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 02:56:12 Lorn Potter wrote:
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should
On 12/05/2009, at 3:04 PM, max wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM, max csy0...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Lorn Potter
lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
max wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter
lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
Levy wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
On 12/05/2009, at 3:04 PM, max wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM, max csy0...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Lorn Potter
lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
max wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at
(Private note: I have this strange sense of Deja Vu :-), although it's been a
long time since we had this argument :-)
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 02:56:12 Lorn Potter wrote:
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:34:18PM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote:
Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in the
web site. any clue any one?
Maybe we'll see an Intel SoC real soon now...
--
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:34:18PM +0200, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote:
Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in the
web site. any clue any one?
Maybe we'll see an Intel SoC real soon now...
--
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:30, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mic...@vanille-media.de wrote:
That's Qt and they have inherited this style from Trolltech.
The way Nokia has developed Maemo it was always about take it or leave it the
way it is.
Looks like they want a framework for UI guys create UIs
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aki Niemi aki.ni...@nokia.com
Date: 2009/5/11
Subject: [Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony
project (oFono)
To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Cc: Marcel Holtmann mar...@holtmann.org
Intel and Nokia are pleased to jointly announce
...@nokia.com
Date: 2009/5/11
Subject: [Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony
project (oFono)
To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Cc: Marcel Holtmann mar...@holtmann.org
Intel and Nokia are pleased to jointly announce the oFono project
(http://ofono.org), an open source project
/11 Jeffrey Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aki Niemi aki.ni...@nokia.com
Date: 2009/5/11
Subject: [Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony
project (oFono)
To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Cc: Marcel Holtmann mar
2009/5/11 tammaro pamdirac palombo pamm...@gmail.com:
an android without the htc? :)
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
da...@tuxbrain.com wrote:
Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any
/11 Jeffrey Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aki Niemi aki.ni...@nokia.com
Date: 2009/5/11
Subject: [Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony
project (oFono)
To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Cc: Marcel Holtmann
On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:16:59 +0200 Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com said:
2009/5/11 tammaro pamdirac palombo pamm...@gmail.com:
an android without the htc? :)
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
da...@tuxbrain.com wrote:
Ok another api framework for
2009/5/11 Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:16:59 +0200 Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com said:
2009/5/11 tammaro pamdirac palombo pamm...@gmail.com:
an android without the htc? :)
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
da...@tuxbrain.com
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
like NIH syndrome.
Until now, trying to co-work with these guys typically went like yeah, you
can take our APIs, if you want. No, we
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mic...@vanille-media.de wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
like NIH syndrome.
Someone is trying to make
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
like NIH syndrome.
kettle calling the pot black...
I always thought one of open source's strengths was
Levy wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mic...@vanille-media.de wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
like NIH syndrome.
Someone
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
Levy wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mic...@vanille-media.de wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is already in
max wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
Levy wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mic...@vanille-media.de wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
max wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
Levy wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mic...@vanille-media.de wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad.
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM, max csy0...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
max wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
Levy wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 20:08, Michael 'Mickey'
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mic...@vanille-media.de wrote:
Yeah,
that's pretty sad. They should have picked FSO or even Pyneo or at least
something that is already in development for quite a while. This way it looks
like NIH syndrome.
Until now, trying to co-work
24 matches
Mail list logo
