i honestly don't get why this flares up again.
the topic has been beaten to death, everybody knows where he stands on the
question -- and yet whenever that bird crows again, there are always some
to crow back.
why can't you just let him alone? he'll get bored soon enough if nobody
plays.
O
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> Please can you save me from reading those walls of text filled with [...]
Thinking about it more, I realize that my initial post in this thread
was more inflammatory than necessary. So I do apologize for posting
that on an emotional impulse without thinking some more
On Fri 17 January 2014 19:13:24 Michael Spacefalcon wrote:
> Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > Not everybody is weighting the factor of "freeable down to the modem"
> > equally when calculating the relative position of two devices to decide
> > between "upgrade" and "downgrade". You have a diffe
Am 17.01.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Michael Spacefalcon:
> Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
>> Not everybody is weighting the factor of "freeable down to the modem" equally
>> when calculating the relative position of two devices to decide between
>> "upgrade" and "downgrade". You have a different
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Not everybody is weighting the factor of "freeable down to the modem" equally
> when calculating the relative position of two devices to decide between
> "upgrade" and "downgrade". You have a different weighting than me.
If freedom is not important to you, then
Quoth Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller:
> Am 16.01.2014 um 21:31 schrieb Michael Spacefalcon:
>
> > Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> >
> >> Why do you assume that your (IMHO unlawful) procedure done to "free" the
> >> Calypso is not possible for a Qualcomm modem?
> >
> > Because all "modern" baseband
I have added back your original statement because otherwise this discussion
is not completely understandable:
>> So please think again if you want to upgrade your GTA02 with a GTA04A5 board.
>
> Upgrade? Surely you must have meant downgrade - why would anyone in
> his or her right mind voluntari
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Why do you assume that your (IMHO unlawful) procedure done to "free" the
> Calypso is not possible for a Qualcomm modem?
Because all "modern" baseband processors (MTK, Qualcomm etc) have ROM
bootloaders which perform cryptographic verification of downloaded fw
i
Am 16.01.2014 um 17:55 schrieb Michael Spacefalcon:
> Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
>> So please think again if you want to upgrade your GTA02 with a GTA04A5 board.
>
> Upgrade? Surely you must have meant downgrade - why would anyone in
> his or her right mind voluntarily give up a device
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> So please think again if you want to upgrade your GTA02 with a GTA04A5 board.
Upgrade? Surely you must have meant downgrade - why would anyone in
his or her right mind voluntarily give up a device that is 100%
freeable down to the modem (GTA02) for a Qualcomm-b
Hi,
it is time to take a look onto the GTA04A5 campaign.
We have currently collected pledges for 19 units.
This is good, but not enough to start a new production run to reach a fairly
reasonable final
price for those preorders.
The calculation is simple. The setup cost of a new production run f
11 matches
Mail list logo
