-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:11:42AM +, Andy Green wrote:
|> Or, you can use Qi which expects to boot from partition 1 that should be
|> ext2 / 3, and have /boot/uImage.bin there.
|
| I thought the
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:11:42AM +, Andy Green wrote:
> Or, you can use Qi which expects to boot from partition 1 that should be
> ext2 / 3, and have /boot/uImage.bin there.
I thought the debian kernel [1] is too old for Qi, isn't it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.24-20080903.git2e
eitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Debian] Benefits of Kernel on separate Partition
> To: community@lists.openmoko.org
> Date: Monday, October 27, 2008, 4:41 PM
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 27.10.2008, 15:17 -0700 schrieb feywulf:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Aside
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Hi Joachim,
|
|
| On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:41:33PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
|> I have heard rumors that uboot will not read very large ext2/3
|> partitions, therefore we create a small one in front.
Hi Joachim,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:41:33PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I have heard rumors that uboot will not read very large ext2/3
> partitions, therefore we create a small one in front. How large is your
> card?
I'm running debian on one 8GB ext2 partition since august without
probl
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.10.2008, 15:17 -0700 schrieb feywulf:
> Hello,
>
> Aside from the tradition of 2 partitions due to the old uboot needing
> the kernel in a fat partition, Is there a benefit to keeping the
> kernel on a separate partition?
I have heard rumors that uboot will not read very la
Hello,
Aside from the tradition of 2 partitions due to the old uboot needing the
kernel in a fat partition, Is there a benefit to keeping the kernel on a
separate partition?
Back story:
I've been using Qt Extended 4.4.1 successfully on a single ext2 partition. I
tried installing Debian on a s
7 matches
Mail list logo
