Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-20 Thread Helge Hafting
Olivier Migeot wrote: Hi ev'ryone, I'm currently experimenting things with the Antaris chip, and I'm starting to like it - at least through FSO and it's gpsd compatibility layer. I've been browsing through the UBX protocol specification, and I stumbled upon one interesting parameter : the

Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-16 Thread macebre
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2009 18:18:26 schrieb Olivier Migeot: Hi ev'ryone, I'm currently experimenting things with the Antaris chip, and I'm starting to like it - at least through FSO and it's gpsd compatibility layer. I've been browsing through the UBX protocol specification, and I stumbled

Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-16 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
If you're already working on FSO, you might consider enhancing our dbus interface to support different navigational models. You'll find that extending our UBX parser helps us more than using ubxgen ;) Cheers, -- :M: ___ Openmoko community mailing

[Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-14 Thread Olivier Migeot
Hi ev'ryone, I'm currently experimenting things with the Antaris chip, and I'm starting to like it - at least through FSO and it's gpsd compatibility layer. I've been browsing through the UBX protocol specification, and I stumbled upon one interesting parameter : the dynamic platform model of the

Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-14 Thread Al Johnson
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Olivier Migeot wrote: I guess I should shut down FSO's GPS handling first, but how? Is stopping fso-gpsd enough? (I tried, but it didn't seem better) Any insights, somebody? Thanks. Disable ogpsd in /etc/frameworkd.conf by adding 'disable = 1' to the [ogpsd]

Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-14 Thread Olivier Migeot
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Al Johnson openm...@mazikeen.demon.co.uk wrote: Disable ogpsd in /etc/frameworkd.conf by adding 'disable = 1' to the [ogpsd] section, then restart frameworkd nicely: Whoa, that was quick, thank you. That'll be ok for some testing, but I sure wouldn't want to

Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-14 Thread Al Johnson
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Olivier Migeot wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Al Johnson openm...@mazikeen.demon.co.uk wrote: Disable ogpsd in /etc/frameworkd.conf by adding 'disable = 1' to the [ogpsd] section, then restart frameworkd nicely: Whoa, that was quick, thank you.

Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-14 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Al Johnson openm...@mazikeen.demon.co.uk writes: /etc/init.d/xserver-nodm stop Hmm, why is stopping X server necessary? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-14 Thread Al Johnson
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: Al Johnson openm...@mazikeen.demon.co.uk writes: /etc/init.d/xserver-nodm stop Hmm, why is stopping X server necessary? Apps using frameworkd can get upset if you restart frameworkd while they are running. This would include zhone,

Re: [Freerunner] Access GPS chip's parameters and navigational models?

2009-01-14 Thread W.Kenworthy
because the qtopia indexing stops with it ... Its probably possible to just stop the app doing the indexing (mediaserver I think), but I am not sure if it would create problems to knock out a low level part of qtopia or not. An alternative is to change the config so on the next boot, it wont