Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out,where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-15 Thread arne anka
how does the end user get to that point? I think there are some who will point to Qi as a part of the solution, but I understand that this is a faith-based discussion. ;) well, i am not 100% sure, but i think indeed it is qi -- not at least because it a) does less on wakeup (might be wrong

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out,where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-15 Thread Richy
I'm using QI, have to wait one ring to get the screen, press accept and than another ring to have the other person actually hear me. The delay is very confusing, for both parties.(Seems like they hear that someone picked up the phone, but can't hear me in the beginning. -- have to acknowledge

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-15 Thread Al Johnson
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, Russell Dwiggins wrote: I'm still a bit confused. I'm in the same boat with others here where it takes between 3 and 4 rings before I can take any action on the incoming call. (shr-u and u-boot, both recently updated) What is the condition that allows one to

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out,where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-15 Thread Marko Knöbl
2009/9/15, Russell Dwiggins undrwa...@verizon.net: I'm still a bit confused. I'm in the same boat with others here where it takes between 3 and 4 rings before I can take any action on the incoming call. (shr-u and u-boot, both recently updated) What is the condition that allows one to take

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-14 Thread Paul Fertser
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:03:38AM +0200, Matthias Huber wrote: Paul Fertser schrieb: Matthias Huber matthias.hu...@wollishausen.de writes: Paul Fertser schrieb: What messages do you see with loglevel=4 that shouldn't be there? For me normal suspend/resume doesn't add

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-14 Thread matzehuber
first, let me say sorry for the post this moring. i had the finger to long on the power knob. in fact, i had loglevel 8 while i took the picture. with loglevel 4 i get (meanwhile) the four messages you told (g_ether) and two more messages of my own. -- View this message in context:

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-14 Thread Paul Fertser
matzehuber matthias.hu...@wollishausen.de writes: with loglevel 4 i get (meanwhile) the four messages you told (g_ether) and two more messages of my own. Ok, np. -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:fercer...@gmail.com

RE: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out,where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-14 Thread Russell Dwiggins
I'm still a bit confused. I'm in the same boat with others here where it takes between 3 and 4 rings before I can take any action on the incoming call. (shr-u and u-boot, both recently updated) What is the condition that allows one to take action on a call ~1 ring, and how does the end user get

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-13 Thread Paul Fertser
Matthias Huber matthias.hu...@wollishausen.de writes: and i suggest to change qi, because, as you said above, it is: 1. easily chanchable upon runtime for the developer 2. faster for the normal daily use 3. qi can with power-key hold give you a loglevel of 8. What messages do you see with

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-13 Thread Matthias Huber
Paul Fertser schrieb: Matthias Huber matthias.hu...@wollishausen.de writes: and i suggest to change qi, because, as you said above, it is: 1. easily chanchable upon runtime for the developer 2. faster for the normal daily use 3. qi can with power-key hold give you a loglevel of 8.

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-13 Thread Paul Fertser
Matthias Huber matthias.hu...@wollishausen.de writes: Paul Fertser schrieb: What messages do you see with loglevel=4 that shouldn't be there? For me normal suspend/resume doesn't add anything to console. ... i cannot tell exact, but i saw this messages. test it yourself. I did. And

[shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-11 Thread Matthias Huber
Warren Baird schrieb: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Matthias Huber matthias.hu...@wollishausen.de mailto:matthias.hu...@wollishausen.de wrote: Hmmm it takes three rings until i can get the call (heear a ring and get a GREEN Button. Don't think, this is fast.

[shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-11 Thread Matthias Huber
Today i did another test, because i patched qi with ghex for giving the kernel loglevel=0, and my result today (look at the bottom for version) was: ONE Ring until i get shr-todays slider to see. That is ok for me. On that there is the question: Why is qi delivered on the repo with debuglevel 4

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-11 Thread Al Johnson
On Friday 11 September 2009, Matthias Huber wrote: Today i did another test, because i patched qi with ghex for giving the kernel loglevel=0, and my result today (look at the bottom for version) was: ONE Ring until i get shr-todays slider to see. That is ok for me. On that there is the

Re: [shr-u] wakeuptime, was Re: 2.6.31 is out, where is my ultimate kernel?

2009-09-11 Thread Matthias Huber
Al Johnson schrieb: On Friday 11 September 2009, Matthias Huber wrote: Today i did another test, because i patched qi with ghex for giving the kernel loglevel=0, and my result today (look at the bottom for version) was: ONE Ring until i get shr-todays slider to see. That is ok for me.