Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Alexander Shulgin
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 03:06, David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com wrote: An now some numbers the average image are 10kb so with the hypotesis than there are one image per article (yes I know there articles with more than a image but there a lot of articles without images) there

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Jörn Hagen
hi, the wish is clear:), but the images on wikipedia are slightly problematic, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download#Images_and_uploaded_files and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights#Non-free_materials_and_special_requirements on the other hand,

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread sucotronic
David Samblas Martinez wrote: 2009/10/31 Sean Moss-Pultz s...@openmoko.com: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Laszlo KREKACS laszlo.krekacs.l...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:22 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com wrote: Are you uploading this changes to

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Michal Brzozowski
2009/11/3 David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com An now some numbers the average image are 10kb so with the hypotesis than there are one image per article (yes I know there articles with more than a image but there a lot of articles without images) there will be about 3.000.000

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread David Garabana Barro
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 09:46:44 Alexander Shulgin wrote: Can we run zlib and, wait-wait... libpng on the device? :) Good point! png compress 1 bit images a lot! ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread sucotronic
Davide wrote: On Tuesday 03 November 2009 09:46:44 Alexander Shulgin wrote: Can we run zlib and, wait-wait... libpng on the device? :) Good point! png compress 1 bit images a lot! ___ Openmoko community mailing list

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
Regarding compression, I believe lzma is already builded in the wikireader application and it compress the images a 50%. enough for start I guess. but I have to recongnize than the image on png looks really good do maybe it worth the meaning to implemente it on the device if it's not much

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:15:11PM +0100, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: Regarding licensing , well until OM or/and Wikipiedia doesn't say the contrary (for example considering Wikireader as an extension of the Wikipedia and allow all wikipedia image to be on Wikireader) we must stay in

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread David Garabana Barro
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 12:15:11 David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: Regarding compression, I believe lzma is already builded in the wikireader application and it compress the images a 50%. enough for start I guess. but I have to recongnize than the image on png looks really good do maybe

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Tilman Baumann
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:15:11PM +0100, David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: Also some way to not infringe the authoring and licencing text includings clauses must be used by the images viewer. but I guess it can be done by links to text as other wikipage

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
David Reyes Samblas Martinez http://www.tuxbrain.com Open ultraportable embedded solutions Openmoko, Openpandora, Arduino Hey, watch out!!! There's a linux in your pocket!!! 2009/11/3 David Garabana Barro da...@garabana.com: On Tuesday 03 November 2009 12:15:11 David Reyes Samblas Martinez

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
I'm not sure if this is a desired workflow. But I don't think whis will be a problem if everybody builds his own wikireder offline database. Meaning, Wikireader ships and maintains a database with all safe content. And if you like more you do it yourself. If the viewer is already implemented

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Tilman Baumann
David Reyes Samblas Martinez wrote: But having maps, flags, schematics and other low dynamic stuff makes total sense. I see the flags more problematic than van Gough ... a lot of them relies on colors to diferentiate each other so italian,french,irish, and all the miriad trhee vertical

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Evgeniy Ginzburg
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:06 AM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com wrote: [snip] I have find a process[1] I think it can be industrialized to transform any image of the wikipedia to one more or less good to the device is clear than we can expect a real time 3D zoomable render on

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Michal Brzozowski
2009/11/3 Evgeniy Ginzburg nad@gmail.com On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:06 AM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com wrote: [snip] I have find a process[1] I think it can be industrialized to transform any image of the wikipedia to one more or less good to the device is clear

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread Evgeniy Ginzburg
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Michal Brzozowski ruso...@poczta.fm wrote: 2009/11/3 Evgeniy Ginzburg nad@gmail.com On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:06 AM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com wrote: [snip] I have find a process[1] I think it can be industrialized to transform any

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-03 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/11/3 Evgeniy Ginzburg nad@gmail.com: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:06 AM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com wrote: [snip] I have find a process[1] I think it can be industrialized to transform any image of the wikipedia to one more or less good to the device is clear than

[wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-02 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/10/31 Sean Moss-Pultz s...@openmoko.com: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Laszlo KREKACS laszlo.krekacs.l...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:22 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com wrote: Are you uploading this changes to git? can I take a look? Btw is there

Re: [wikireader] Images on the WR not so imposible :P [was [wikireader]Error on parsing the spanish wikipedia]

2009-11-02 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/11/3 David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com: 2009/10/31 Sean Moss-Pultz s...@openmoko.com: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Laszlo KREKACS laszlo.krekacs.l...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:22 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez da...@tuxbrain.com wrote: Are you