On Wednesday 14 February 2007 11:52, t3st3r wrote:
[snip]
> I'm do not care about google mail. However it is quite strange that when
> I'm about to reply, there is actual message author in To: and mailing
> list in CC: in my Thunderbird.As for me, this is inconvienient. IMHO,
> list address should
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance:
Proposed wiki page:
How to respond to list email:
1. Never remove any "re: " in the message subject. Some (not all) email
clients use this to identify the thread.
2. If your email client adds the original poster and other
addressees to the
Robert Michel wrote:
[...deleted]
I've tried Yahoo mail, didn't like it, I even tried Fastmail in the
past. (which was slow)
Gmail is responsive for me, and has a lot of good features that I like
and that I use.
And so far I have yet to see any proof of Google actively scr*wing
over their cu
>S: Small hint:
Your Email hasn't a working "References:" or "In-Reply-To:"
in its header, so no email client could put it into the
right thread. Please check if you can answer with
"Referneces".
I'm new to forums, etc. Could someone post a tutorial on using Apple
mail for referec
@ Hank, please don't be spiteful. We get nowhere by name-calling.
Marcel,
You are right. Despite the suggestions that I as a gmail user
1. dont know any better"
2. am ignorant,
3. shouldnt be on the list
4. am somehow imoral for using gmail
5. am assisting gmail in spying on him
I shouldnt ha
Hello Robert
my apologies too, I was somewhere in a bad mood at the moment I wrote
that response, it was like adding oil on the flames, you couldn't know
that either.
On 2/13/07, Robert Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Salve Marcel,*!
This is a personal answer from me - I'm very sorry to star
Reid,
Your test doesnt work when you are looking at messages that you
yourself sent. Messages you send from a given thread are always in the
same thread, but messages from someone else from the same thread with
a different subject are not put in the same thread, and that is the
problem on the lis
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:00 -0500, hank williams wrote:
> On 2/13/07, Reid Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:02 -0500, hank williams wrote:
> > > hmm... guess those Google guys aren't smart enough to handle mail "the
> > > better way". With your way, even if you chang
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Richard Bennett wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 15:28, hank williams wrote:
Again, out of 15 lists, this only happens for me on the openmoko list.
Now I have read that some consider this a feature. And perhaps there
are benefits I don't understand. but with 25-50% of
Oh, and one more thing. You've been told this by others before, but
you igore it so I will say it again. You keep changing the subject of
your posts, and whether you like it or not you are screwing up gmail
threading, and I suspect threading from other programs. That wouldnt
be so bad if your new
> Gmail is responsive for me, and has a lot of good features that I like
> and that I use.
> And so far I have yet to see any proof of Google actively scr*wing
> over their customers, by violating their privacy. Yes they add ads on
> the side of the page by scanning your email,
Yes, google is sca
On 2/13/07, Reid Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:02 -0500, hank williams wrote:
> hmm... guess those Google guys aren't smart enough to handle mail "the
> better way". With your way, even if you change the subject it would be
> part of the same thread.
I believe that
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:02 -0500, hank williams wrote:
> hmm... guess those Google guys aren't smart enough to handle mail "the
> better way". With your way, even if you change the subject it would be
> part of the same thread.
I believe that is proper --> to remain part of the same thread. To
c
Salve Marcel,*!
This is a personal answer from me - I'm very sorry to started
this thread going into deep and I do not want to harm Openmoko
by dissmotivating people to join...
So, my style was not ok and I already asked for excuse me.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Marcel de Jong wrote:
> Sorry for not
But webmailer and services payed with adverticement and data mining
are still sub optimal solutions and IMHO provoking when they are
producing problems - e.g. based on that the users does known only
hotmail.com, AOL, gmail or outlook and does not know that there are
more and better solutions
Sorry for not replying at the bottom...
Why the open hostility towards GMail users?
You all tout "we want freedom to choose" and all that, but still you'd
like to stifle the same level of freedom of others.
I choose to use GMail, that's a deliberate choice, because it's one of
the few great _we
Salve Andrew!
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Andrew Turner wrote:
> As a Gmail user (all my emails route to Gmail), I found it the best
> because it is free, reliable, works on all my mobile devices, large
> storage, easy to use, good spam filtering, and has excellent
> threading.
>
> In fact, the only me
Thanks Richard.
I have read this before, but forgot the official name of reply-to munging.
I think your analysis is correct. The only thing I would say is that
the "non-standards compliant" way of handling list administration is
in fact, as far as I can tell, the standard way that at least the m
On 2/13/07, Robert Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Salve hank!
This explains the CC'ing.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, hank williams wrote:
> I just read the other email which started this discussion about gmail
> and think I understand the problem.
>
> The problem is with the list.
>
> I am on 15 te
On 2/13/07, Robert Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Salve hank!
Thank you for your feedback ;)
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, hank williams wrote:
> You are misinformed if you believe that gmail does not handle threads
> properly.
Maybe, it would be nice when other gmail users
explain gmail users how t
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 15:28, hank williams wrote:
> Again, out of 15 lists, this only happens for me on the openmoko list.
> Now I have read that some consider this a feature. And perhaps there
> are benefits I don't understand. but with 25-50% of the tech mailing
> list readers using gmail,
Salve hank!
This explains the CC'ing.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, hank williams wrote:
> I just read the other email which started this discussion about gmail
> and think I understand the problem.
>
> The problem is with the list.
>
> I am on 15 tech mailing lists, and this is the only one which, if
As a Gmail user (all my emails route to Gmail), I found it the best
because it is free, reliable, works on all my mobile devices, large
storage, easy to use, good spam filtering, and has excellent
threading.
In fact, the only messages that become de-threaded are yours rob. Your
habit of changing
Salve hank!
Thank you for your feedback ;)
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, hank williams wrote:
> You are misinformed if you believe that gmail does not handle threads
> properly.
Maybe, it would be nice when other gmail users
explain gmail users how to use gmail proper,
instead of that I have to inform
I just read the other email which started this discussion about gmail
and think I understand the problem.
The problem is with the list.
I am on 15 tech mailing lists, and this is the only one which, if I in
gmail say "reply to" replys to the sender and not to the list.
I NEVER*** want to re
Robert,
You are misinformed if you believe that gmail does not handle threads
properly. In fact I think it is the best product on the market, free
or otherwise, for handling threads. The problem which you are
referring to has nothing to do with gmail, but with the fact that some
people mistakenl
Salve!
Excuse me, I myself was writing once here on this list
about respect and to give everybody a warm welcome.
The best solution for mailinglist formal things would
be personal mails with explaination...
Robert Michel schrieb am Dienstag, den 13. Februar 2007 um 13:57h:
> The gmailers here on
Salve Richard, *!
I full agree with you! But dubbel mails from gmail is IMHO
not the worst - it is starting new threads with every answer
be not using working "Referneces" or "In-Replay-To"
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Richard Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
> Why so many people who believe in the ideals put f
28 matches
Mail list logo
