On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 23:01 -1000, Jim Thompson wrote:
it will be interesting to see which parts of the FCC application are
marked 'proprietary'.
I really have no idea about this. But if there's something that you want
to see, that's marked 'proprietary' let me know and I'll see what I can
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 14:54 -0400, Duncan Hudson wrote:
That’s about as far as I bothered reading – I’ll wait until there
is
an official FIC response in the next 24-48 hours about how they
intend to supply orders in the USA before I bother reading any
more.
The NEO will be FCC
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 14:54 -0400, Duncan Hudson wrote:
That’s about as far as I bothered reading – I’ll wait until there
is
an official FIC response in the next 24-48 hours about how they
intend to supply orders in the USA before I bother reading any
more.
The NEO
I had really forgotten about FCC approval until I saw the iPhone
certification story. Then it drove home the point that if FIC
hasn't started FCC the certification yet the delivery date (at
least in the US) is going to slip again.
Well, I assume that FIC - having built computers for many
Am 21.05.2007 um 04:57 schrieb Joe Friedrichsen:
It would be great to know if any of the P0 folks are US-based as well.
The majority sound European, save Rod :-)
Well, the EU has similar rules but there is no central FCC. It is
called CE and the entity (you personally, a distributor, a
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On May 21, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Dean Collins wrote:
I wonder what percentage of a device can be pre-assembled and still
constitute a 'kit'
Section 15.23 Home-built devices.
(a) Equipment authorization is not required for devices that are not
marketed,
from a kit,
Sorry guys, but what do you want to certify? P1 device? P1+'s hardware is
supposed to change and
P2's hardware is supposed to be the same like P1+, but what if not. I do not
know certification
rules, I can only guess that it needs working device, isn't it? :-)
Piotr
Duncan Hudson napisał(a):
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 21.05.2007 um 04:57 schrieb Joe Friedrichsen:
It would be great to know if any of the P0 folks are US-based as well.
The majority sound European, save Rod :-)
Well, the EU has similar rules but there is no central FCC. It is
called CE and the entity (you
Just read that the iPhone was granted FCC approval. I asked along time
ago, has the OpenMoko FCC certification process even begun yet? No FCC
approval, no license to sell the product in the US...
Dunc
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community
Duncan Hudson wrote:
Just read that the iPhone was granted FCC approval. I asked along time
ago, has the OpenMoko FCC certification process even begun yet? No FCC
approval, no license to sell the product in the US...
Its not a license. You can't sell, or offer to sell a device subject
May 2007 15:52:06 Jim Thompson wrote:
Duncan Hudson wrote:
Just read that the iPhone was granted FCC approval. I asked along time
ago, has the OpenMoko FCC certification process even begun yet? No FCC
approval, no license to sell the product in the US...
Its not a license. You can't sell
Jason Elwell wrote:
Jim,
Question: Do the regulations govern devices that are offered for sale in the
US, but not devices that are sold by an off-shore company to people in the
US?
I was under the impression that any electronic device sold for use in the USA
has to be cleared by the FCC.
For purposes of the regulations, what exactly is a device? If the
actual tranceiver is approved (and I assume it is), does that carry
approval for a phone using it?
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
For purposes of the regulations, what exactly is a device? If the
actual tranceiver is approved (and I assume it is), does that carry
approval for a phone using it?
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/rules/
___
OpenMoko community
It would be great to know if any of the P0 folks are US-based as well.
The majority sound European, save Rod :-)
Joe
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: FCC Approval
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
For purposes of the regulations, what exactly is a device? If the
actual tranceiver is approved (and I assume it is), does that carry
approval for a phone using it?
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/rules
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: RE: FCC Approval
Yep - I love how they say we only have a courtesy copy here for you to
view ...
excuse me?? You're federal government - I pay my taxes - you work for
me!!
If you don't want to make the rules available in a non proprietary
format
Jim Thompson wrote:
Duncan Hudson wrote:
Just read that the iPhone was granted FCC approval. I asked along
time ago, has the OpenMoko FCC certification process even begun yet?
No FCC approval, no license to sell the product in the US...
Its not a license. You can't sell, or offer to sell
18 matches
Mail list logo
