Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-03-01 Thread
William Kenworthy schrieb: > No, I mean remove both the other two keyboards so only terminal is left. > Then the word space and switcher are redundant and they both can be > removed saving space. My fingers are too fat to use either of those > two, the dictionary is hopeless and they take forever

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-03-01 Thread Pander
William Kenworthy wrote: > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 09:03 +0100, Pander wrote: > ... >> Have you tried the alternative keyboards (alpha and num) from opkg.org? >> >>> BillK >>> > > > No, just did a search for "keyboard" and they didnt show up. What was > new was optimsms which has possibilities. >

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-03-01 Thread William Kenworthy
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 09:03 +0100, Pander wrote: ... > Have you tried the alternative keyboards (alpha and num) from opkg.org? > > > BillK > > No, just did a search for "keyboard" and they didnt show up. What was new was optimsms which has possibilities. Were they a alpha/number dutch kb? - s

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-03-01 Thread Pander
William Kenworthy wrote: > On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 18:49 +0100, "Bernd (Jesus McCloud) PrĂ¼nster" > wrote: >> William Kenworthy schrieb: >>> I would rather the space - the other two keyboards are pretty >>> useless ... >>> >>> BillK >>> >>> On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:54 +0100, Pander wrote: >>>

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-02-28 Thread William Kenworthy
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 18:49 +0100, "Bernd (Jesus McCloud) PrĂ¼nster" wrote: > William Kenworthy schrieb: > > I would rather the space - the other two keyboards are pretty > > useless ... > > > > BillK > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:54 +0100, Pander wrote: > > > >> John Sullivan wrote: > >>

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-02-28 Thread
William Kenworthy schrieb: > I would rather the space - the other two keyboards are pretty > useless ... > > BillK > > On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:54 +0100, Pander wrote: > >> John Sullivan wrote: >> >>> Pander writes: >>> >>> Hi all, Someone mentioned a finger friendly

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-02-28 Thread William Kenworthy
I would rather the space - the other two keyboards are pretty useless ... BillK On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:54 +0100, Pander wrote: > John Sullivan wrote: > > Pander writes: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Someone mentioned a finger friendly browse keoyboard, and I just could > >> not resist making one

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-02-28 Thread Pander
John Sullivan wrote: > Pander writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> Someone mentioned a finger friendly browse keoyboard, and I just could >> not resist making one myself. the result is here: >> http://www.opkg.org/package_144.html >> > > Nice, is there any way to remove the box that usually shows the wo

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-02-28 Thread John Sullivan
Pander writes: > Hi all, > > Someone mentioned a finger friendly browse keoyboard, and I just could > not resist making one myself. the result is here: > http://www.opkg.org/package_144.html > Nice, is there any way to remove the box that usually shows the words that are being typed at the top

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-02-26 Thread Pander
Yorick Moko wrote: > looks good, > maybe one little comment: > I would have have put "ctrl" as the lower left button Then I'd have to put the TAB in the place where CTRL is now next to the ALT, which is a bit odd. Either way it is always a bit strange. > > when playing action games for example:

Re: Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-02-26 Thread Yorick Moko
looks good, maybe one little comment: I would have have put "ctrl" as the lower left button when playing action games for example: arrows: move space: open/jump ctrl: shoot On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Pander wrote: > Hi all, > > Someone mentioned a finger friendly browse keoyboard, and I ju

Finger friendly browse keyboard

2009-02-26 Thread Pander
Hi all, Someone mentioned a finger friendly browse keoyboard, and I just could not resist making one myself. the result is here: http://www.opkg.org/package_144.html Note that the type is NUMERIC, let me know if another type better suites this keyboard. It is also referenced here: http://wik