On 24 Jan 2007, at 7:13 pm, David Schlesinger wrote:
Where did I, or anybody else, DEMAND that OpenMoko give credit to
GNU?
Dave Crossland's demanded it on a couple of occasions. Go back and
reread his latest messages, particularly his message of 6:13 am
this morning.
It might help
I think we've heard the viewpoints of both sides...
In my humble opinion, this whole discussion (while it showed some good
viewpoints on both sides) is a bit premature. We haven't seen any
documentation from the Openmoko team that suggests that they use one
notation or the other.
As Sean already
On 1/24/07 10:20 AM, Declan Naughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I am aware, OpenMoko is not using the GNU/CMU Mach kernel..
No, they're certainly not. However, GNU _is_ and they're failing to give
appropriate credit to the principal developer of their system. So on what
basis are you
On 1/24/07 11:03 AM, Declan Naughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/24/07, David Schlesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/24/07 10:20 AM, Declan Naughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I am aware, OpenMoko is not using the GNU/CMU Mach kernel..
No, they're certainly not. However, GNU
On 1/24/07, David Schlesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/24/07 11:03 AM, Declan Naughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/24/07, David Schlesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/24/07 10:20 AM, Declan Naughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I am aware, OpenMoko is not using the GNU/CMU
5 matches
Mail list logo
